Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring the Convergence/Divergence of “Serious Crime” Arrest Rates for Males and Females: 1960–1995

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is now almost a quarter of a century since Adler (1975) and Simon (1975)stimulated a debate about the convergence of crime rates for men andwomen. The ensuing debate generated literally dozens of papers. Given theexistence of a series that now extends from 1960 to 1995, this papersuggests an appropriate way to examine the convergence hypothesis usingtime series techniques. These techniques take into consideration the effectsof the following factors: (a) random “shocks” or“innovations,” (b) the potentially lasting effects of suchinnovations, and (c) the autocorrelation that time series oftenexhibit. Using time series techniques on annual data, we examine trends inthe arrest rates for males and females for six Part I crimes (homicide,robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, and motor vehicle theft)for the years 1960 through 1995. We test for convergence, divergence, notrend, and a special condition of equilibrium between series calledcointegration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adler, F. (1975). Sisters in Crime, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, R. L. (1993). Recent trends in official male and female crime rates: The convergence controversy. J. Crim. Just. 21: 447–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonger, W. A. (1916). Crime and Economic Conditions, Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of the Census (selected years). Current Population Surveys: Series P-25, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

  • Darrow, C. (1922). Crime: Its Causes and Treatment, Patterson-Smith, Montclair, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., and Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55: 251–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., and Granger, C. W. J. (1991). Introduction. In Engle, R. F., and Granger, C. W. J. (eds.), Long-Run Economic Relationships: Readings in Cointegration, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • EVIEWS (1994). EVIEWS: Econometric Views, Quantitative Micro Software, Irvine, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (1961–1996). Crime in the United States, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Time Series Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M. J. (1979). Sex differences in criminal activities. Social Problems 27: 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivkovich, S. K. (1995). Analysis of robbery in light of the convergence hypothesis. J. Crime Just. 18: 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J. G. (1991). Critical values for cointegration tests. In Engle, R. F., and Granger, C. W. J. (eds.), Long-Run Economic Relationships: Readings in Cointegration, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noblit, G. W., and Burcart, J. M. (1976). Women and crime: 1960–1970. Soc. Sci. Q. 56: 650–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norland, S., and Shover, N. (1977). Gender roles and female criminality: Some critical comments. Criminology 15: 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, R. M. (1988). Exploring the intersexual nature of violent crimes. Criminology 26: 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, R. M. (1995). Crime and victimization data. In Sheley, J. F. (ed.), Criminology: A Contemporary Handbook, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, pp. 57–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, R. (1997). Changing relationships between men and women: A note on the decline in intimate partner homicide. Homicide Stud. 1: 72–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. J. (1975). Women and Crime, D. C. Heath, Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. J. (1976a). Contemporary Women and Crime, National Institute of Mental Health, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. J. (1976b). Women and crime revisited. Soc. Sci. Q. 56: 658–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D. J. (1980). Sex differences in patterns of adult crime, 1965–1977: A review and assessment. Soc. Forces 58: 1080–1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D. J. (1993). National trends in female arrests, 1960–1990: Assessment and recommendations for research. J. Quant. Criminol. 9: 411–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D. J., and Cobb, M. J. (1981). Sex differences in urban arrest patterns, 1934- 1979. Soc. Problems 29: 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D. J., and Streifel, C. (1992). Time-series analysis of the female percentage of arrest for property crimes, 1960–1985: A test of alternative explanations, Just. Q. 9: 77–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellin, T. (1931). The basis of a crime index. J. Am. Inst. of Crim. Law Criminol. 22: 335–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H. (1997). Visual revelations. Chance 10: 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Brien, R.M. Measuring the Convergence/Divergence of “Serious Crime” Arrest Rates for Males and Females: 1960–1995. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 15, 97–114 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007518326031

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007518326031

Navigation