Skip to main content
Log in

On characterizing supremum andl p -efficient facility designs

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Define a design to be any planar setD of known areaa, but of unknown shape and location; more generally, a design can be any set inR d of measurea. For example, a design might be one floor of a warehouse, or a sports arena of known seating capacity. Suppose that the design has, say,m users, or evaluators, with user/evaluatori having a design disutility functionu i , 1≤im, which can be defined for all points in the plane independently of the designs of interest. Given any designD, denote byG i (D) the disutility ofD to user/evaluatori where, by definition,G i (D) is the supremum ofu i over the setD, 1≤im. LetG(D) be the vector with entriesG i (D), 1≤im, and define a design to be efficient if it solves the vector minimization problem obtained using the set of vectors {G(D):D a design}. Given mild assumptions about the disutility functions, and a slight refinement of the design definition to rule out certain pathologies, we present necessary and sufficient conditions for a design to be efficient, and study properties of efficient designs. In the final section, we extend the analysis to more generall p -measures of design disutility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keeney, R. L., andRaiffa, H.,Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Trade-Offs, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Francis, R. L.,Sufficient Conditions for Some Optimum-Property Facility Designs, Operations Research, Vol. 15, pp. 448–466, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kottas, J. F.,Spectator Seating Preference as a Determinant in Design and Pricing Decisions, Design Methods and Theories, Vol. 11, pp. 91–97, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chalmet, L. G., Francis, R. L., andLawrence, J. F.,Efficiency in Integral Facility Design Problems, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 32, No. 2, 1980.

  5. Francis, R. L., andWhite, J. A.,Facilities Layout and Location: An Analytical Approach, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Royden, H. L.,Real Analysis, The Macmillan Company, New York, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hall, D. W., andSpencer, G. L.,Elementary Topology, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by P. L. Yu

This research was supported in part by the Interuniversity College for PhD studies in Management Sciences, Brussels, Belgium; by the Army Research Office, Triangle Park, North Carolina; by a National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council Postdoctorate Associateship; and by the Operations Research Division, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC. The authors would like to thank Dr. A. J. Goldman for his many constructive suggestions, and Dr. A. Veinott for suggesting the problems considered in Section 3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chalmet, L.G., Francis, R.L. & Lawrence, J.F. On characterizing supremum andl p -efficient facility designs. J Optim Theory Appl 35, 129–141 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00934708

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00934708

Key Words

Navigation