Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency of Drug Targeting: Steady-State Considerations Using a Three-Compartment Model

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physiological models have often been used to investigate the processes involved in drug targeting. Such a model is used to investigate some aspects of drug targeting, including the pharmacodynamics of therapeutic and toxic effects. A simple pharmacodynamic model is incorporated in a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Conventional administration and drug targeting are compared at steady state for the same degree of therapeutic effect. The efficiency of drug targeting is quantified as the ratio (TA) of the rates of administration of free drug or of a drug–carrier complex required to achieve this effect. Also, the ratios of drug concentrations in the toxicity compartment (DTI) or of the consequent degree of toxic effects (TI) are used to compare conventional administration with drug targeting. The kinetic characteristics of the drug–carrier complex, rate of elimination, and rate of free drug release, influence TA but not DTI or TI. The importance of these characteristics depends on the cost and toxicity of the drug–carrier complex or of the carrier alone. The pharmacodynamics of the free drug in both the target and the toxicity compartments have an important influence on TI but not on TA or DTI. As the pharmacological selectivity of the drug increases, so does TI. However, a drug with good pharmacological selectivity may not be suitable for drug targeting. TI is also very dependent on the shape of the effect–concentration curves, particularly that for toxicity. While TA increases as the rate of elimination of free drug from either central or target compartments increases, TI may actually be reduced if release of free drug is not confined to the target compartment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. G. Gregoriadis, G. Poste, J. Senior, and A. Trouet (eds.). Receptor-Mediated Targeting of Drugs (NATO ASI, Series A, Life Sciences, Vol. 82), Plenum Press, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Tomlinson. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 1:87–198 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Robinson and V. H. L. Lee (eds.). Controlled Drug Delivery: Fundamentals and Applications, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. J. Stella and K. J. Himmelstein. In R. T. Borchardt, A. J. Repta, and V. J. Stella (eds.), Directed Drug Delivery, Humana Press, New York, 1985, pp. 247–267.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. A. Hunt, R. D. MacGregor, and R. A. Siegel. Pharm. Res. 3:333–344 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. J. F. M. Smits and H. H. W. Thijssen. In H. A. J. Struyker-Boudier (ed.), Rate-Controlled Drug Administration and Action, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1986, pp. 83–114.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Levy. Pharm. Res. 4:3–4 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. L. Dedrick. J. Pharm. Sci. 75:1047–1052 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. H. G. Holford and L. B. Sheiner. Pharmacol. Ther. 16:143–166 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. W. Eckman, C. S. Patlak, and J. D. Fenstermacher. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 2:257–285 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Øie and J.-D. Huang, J. Pharm. Sci. 70:1344–1347 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boddy, A., Aarons, L. & Petrak, K. Efficiency of Drug Targeting: Steady-State Considerations Using a Three-Compartment Model. Pharm Res 6, 367–372 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015971113161

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015971113161

Navigation