Abstract
The e + e −→ηγ→7γ process was studied in the energy range 2E=600–1060 MeV with an SND detector on a VEPP-2M e + e − collider. The decay branching ratios B(φ→ηγ)=(1.353±0.011±0.052)×10−2, B(ω→ηγ)=(4.62±0.71±0.18)×10−4, and B(ρ→ηγ)=(2.73±0.31±0.15)×10−4 were measured.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Caso et al. (Particle Data Group), Eur. Phys. J. C 3 (1998).
P. O’Donnell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 673 (1981).
G. Morpurgo, Phys. Rev. D 42, 1497 (1990).
M. Benayoun et al., Phys. Rev. D 59, 114027 (1999).
M. N. Achasov et al., Preprint No. 98-65, IYaF (Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, 1998).
M. N. Achasov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 449, 125 (2000).
N. N. Achasov et al., J. Mod. Phys. A 7, 3187 (1992).
N. N. Achasov et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 12, 25 (2000).
N. N. Achasov, K. I. Beloborodov, A. V. Berdyugin, et al., Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 117, 22 (2000) [JETP 90, 17 (2000)].
M. N. Achasov et al., Pis’ma Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 68, 599 (1998) [JETP Lett. 68, 573 (1998)].
R. R. Akhmetshin et al., Phys. Lett. B 460, 242 (1999); hep-ex/9907003.
T. Case et al., Phys. Rev. D 61, 32002 (2000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
__________
Translated from Pis’ma v Zhurnal Éksperimental’no\(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\smile}$}}{l} \) i Teoretichesko\(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\smile}$}}{l} \) Fiziki, Vol. 72, No. 6, 2000, pp. 411–415.
Original Russian Text Copyright © 2000 by Achasov, Baru, Beloborodov, Berdyugin, Bozhenok, Bogdanchikov, Bukin, Burdin, Vasil’ev, Velikzhanin, Dimova, Druzhinin, Dubrovin, Ganyushin, Gaponenko, Golubev, Ivanchenko, Koop, Korol’, Koshuba, Kukartsev, Pakhtusova, Sal’nikov, Serednyakov, Shary\(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\smile}$}}{l} \), Shatunov, Sidorov, Silagadze.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Achasov, M.N., Baru, S.E., Beloborodov, K.I. et al. Study of the ρ, ω, ϕ→ηγ→7γ decays with an SND detector on a VEPP-2M collider. Jetp Lett. 72, 282–285 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1328437
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1328437