Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract.

A folding potential describing the \(\alpha\)-scattering on 16O over a broad energy range 25.8-146.0 MeV is constructed on the basis of \(\alpha\)-like cluster and unclustered-nucleon configurations of 16O. The resulting potential does not need any renormalization to fit the angular distribution of elastic cross-sections. The effects of the repulsive part of \(\alpha\)-\(\alpha\) and \(\alpha\)-nucleon interactions are investigated. The analysis suggests that both the \(\alpha\)-\(\alpha\) repulsive potential and the unclustered nucleonic configuration in the target are important to describe the scattering data over a broad range of incident energies. The root-mean-square radius for the 16O nucleus is deduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 52, 1083 (1937).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Brink, J.J. Castro, Nucl. Phys. A 216, 109 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li Qing-Run, Yang Yong-Xu, Nucl. Phys. A 561, 181 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Y.-X. Yang, Q.-R. Li, Europhys. Lett. 21, 657 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. El-Azab Farid, J. Phys. G 16, 461 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. El-Azab Farid, Z.M.M. Mahmoud, G.S. Hassan, Phys. Rev. C 64, 014310 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P.P. Singh, P. Schwandt, G.C. Yang, Phys. Lett. B 59, 113 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Neu, H. Abele, P.D. Eversheim, F. Hinterberger , H. Oberhummer, H. Jäntach, Ch. Striebel, G. Staudt, M. Walz, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. Suppl. 58, 574 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.M. Kobos, B.A. Brown, R. Lindsay, G.R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. A 425, 205 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Abele, G. Staudt, Phys. Rev. C 47, 742 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. U. Atzrott, P. Mohr, H. Abele, C. Hillenmayer, G. Staudt, Phys. Rev. C 53, 1336 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Abele, H.J. Hauser, A. Körber, W. Leitner, R. Neu, H. Plappert, T. Rohwer, G. Staudt, M. Straßer, S. Welte, M. Walz, P.D. Eversheim, F. Hinterberger, Z. Phys. A 326, 373 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Bertsch, J. Borysowicz, H. McManus, W.G. Love, Nucl. Phys. A 284, 399 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dao T. Khoa, G.R. Satchler, W. von Oertzen, Phys. Rev. C 56, 954 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dao T. Khoa, Phys. Rev. C 63, 034007 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S.A.E. Khallaf, A.M.A. Amry, S.R. Mokhtar, Phys. Rev. C 56, 2093 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A.A. Cowley, G. Heymann, Nucl. Phys. A 146, 465 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. F. Michel, J. Albinski, P. Belery, Th. Delbar, Gh. Grégoire, B. Tasiaux, G. Reidemeister, Phys. Rev. C 28, 1904 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Hauser, R. Löhken, H. Rebel, G. Schatz, G.W. Schweiner, J. Specht, Nucl. Phys. A 128, 81 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. K.T. Knöpfle, G.J. Wagner, H. Breuer, M. Rogge, C. Mayer-Bricke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 779 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Block, J.W. Clark, M.D. High, R. Malmin, F.B. Malik, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 62, 464 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. Feshbach, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 5, 357 (1958).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Feshbach, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 19, 287 (1962).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. N. Austern, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 45, 113 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  25. B. Buck, H. Friedrich, C. Wheatley, Nucl. Phys. A 275, 246 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Ali, A.R. Bodmer, Nucl. Phys. 80, 99 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Ali, A.A.Z. Ahmad, N. Ferdous, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 923 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Sack, L.C. Biedenharn, G. Breit, Phys. Rev. 93, 321 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  29. B. Buck, H. Friedrich, C. Wheatley, Phys. Rev. C 11, 1803 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. H. de Vries, C.W. de Jager, C. de Vries, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 36, 495 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  31. O. Bersillon, SCAT2 code, NEA 0289, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  32. F. James, M. Roos, Comput. Phys. Commun. 10, 343 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. G.P. Mueller, J.W. Clark, Nucl. Phys. A 155, 561 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  34. G. Roepke, Cond. Matter Theories 16, 468 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  35. P.E. Hodgson, Contemp. Phys. 31, 99 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. Basak.

Additional information

Communicated by A. Molinari

Received: 5 December 2002, Published online: 9 October 2003

PACS:

25.55.Ci Elastic and inelastic scattering - 24.10.Ht Optical and diffraction models - 21.60.Gx Cluster models

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdullah, M.N.A., Hossain, S., Sarker, M.S.I. et al. Cluster structure of 16O. Eur. Phys. J. A 18, 65–73 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2002-10168-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2002-10168-7

Keywords

Navigation