Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative efficacy of pedigree selection and selective intermating in greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Selective intermating and pedigree selection methods were applied simultaneously to highly heterogeneous and heterozygous base populations of greengram in order to compare their relative efficacy in terms of evolving the number of productive lines as well as their production potential. Selection after two cycles of selective intermating was found to be a better method than traditional pedigree selection. The demerits of pedigree selection and merits of selective intermating are discussed. It is suggested that selective intermating replace the widely adopted but less effective pedigree selection for generating promising new material in such autogamous crops as greengram.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Compton WA (1968) Recurrent selection in self-pollinated crops without extensive crossing. Crop Sci 8:773

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Adl AM, Miller PA (1971) Transgressive segregation and nature of gene action for yield in an inter-varietal cross of upland cotton. Crop Sci 11:381–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill KS, Bains SS, Singh G, Bains KS (1973) Partial diallel test crossing for yield and its components in Triticum eastivum L. In: Sears ER, Sears LMS (eds) 4th Int Wheat Genet Symp. MO Agricultural Exp Stn, Columbia, pp 29–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson WD (1959) The break up of initial linkage blocks under selected mating systems. Genetics 44:857–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson WD, Probst AH, Caldwell BE (1967) Evaluation of population of soybean genotypes, with implications for improving self-pollinated crops. Crop Sci 7:99–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen NF (1970) A diallel selective meeting system for cereal breeding. Crop Sci 10:629–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi AB, Dhawan NL (1966) Genetic improvement of yield with special reference to self-fertilizing crops. Indian J Genet 26A: 101–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor WR (1977) Studies on breeding methodology and optional environments, for wide adaptation in wheat. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Punjab Agric Univ, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadr FH, Frey KJ (1965) Effectiveness of recurrent selection in oat breeding (Avena sativa L.). Crop Sci 5:349–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochhar S (1974) Genetic analysis of resistance to brown rust and of some agronomic characters in a cross of wheat. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Punjab Agric University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller PA, Rawlings JO (1967) Break-up of initial linkage blocks through intermating cotton populations. Crop Sci 7:199–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Panse VG, Sukhatme PV (1978) Statistical methods for agricultural workers. ICAR, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Redden RJ, Jensen NF (1974) Mass selection and mating systems in cereals. Crop Sci 14:345–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh M, Singh VP (1983) A comparative study of recurrent mass and pedigree selections in American Cotton. In: 15th Int Congr Genet. New Delhi

  • Verma MM, Kumar J (1974) Breeding for yield in self-pollinators: an introspection and reorientation. Crop Improve 1:15–31

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G.S.Khush

Part of Ph.D. Thesis submitted by the senior author to the Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dahiya, B.N., Singh, V.P. Comparative efficacy of pedigree selection and selective intermating in greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Theoret. Appl. Genetics 71, 129–132 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00278265

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00278265

Key words

Navigation