Skip to main content
Log in

Non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic responses to nerve stimulation of different regions of the guinea-pig small intestine

  • Published:
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic responses to nerve stimulation recorded from smooth muscles of the guinea-pig duodenum, jejunum, proximal and terminal ileum were investigated in an attempt to characterize these responses.

In the presence of atropine (1–2 μmol · l−1) and guanethidine (10 μmol · l−1) coaxial stimulation induced in all regions of the guinea-pig small intestine an initial relaxation (primary relaxation) upon which contraction (primary contraction) appeared, followed by rebound contraction.

Noradrenaline decreased the cholinergic smooth muscle twitches, predominantly at low stimulation frequencies, and had a similar effect on the non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic primary relaxation, primary and rebound contractions.

ATP decreased the smooth muscle twitches; however, this agent had only a transient influence on the non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic responses of muscle (tension and membrane potential) to single stimuli. With higher stimulus frequencies ATP increased the primary relaxation and decreased the contraction phases. ATP also inhibited the post-tetanic inhibition induced by non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic nerve stimulation.

In most of the muscle cells of the guinea-pig proximal and terminal ileum the non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic nerve stimulation generated i.j.p.s., while about 15–20% of the cells responded with e.j.p.s. During long-lasting stimulation (10s) the i.j.p.s. were sometimes “interrupted” by action potentials or by a gradual depolarization of the membrane. The i.j.p.s. were followed by a marked rebound depolarization accompanying the action potentials. Those cells which generated i.j.p.s. in response to field stimulation, were depolarized by ATP, while those cells, which generated e.j.p.s, were hyperpolarized by ATP.

A reduction in the concentration of extracellular sodium chloride decreased both the primary and rebound contractions; the primary contraction was, however, more sensitive than was the rebound contraction.

Theophylline increased the primary and rebound contractions with no marked influence on the primary relaxation, lowered the action potential threshold, increased the rebound depolarization and did not markedly influence the i.j.p.s.

Quinidine enhanced the primary relaxation and inhibited the primary contraction in a concentration-dependent manner. Inhibition of the rebound contraction by quinidine was slight (less than 50%).

The present results demonstrate that primary relaxation, primary and rebound contractions are associated with i.j.p.s and e.j.p.s., and rebound depolarization with action potentials, respectively; they are typical responses of various regions of the guinea-pig small intestine to activation of inhibitory and excitatory non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic nerves. The P1 and P2 receptors, proposed by Burnstock (1975), probably do not mediate the non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic postsynaptic responses of the guinea-pig small intestine. A possible physiological function of ATP as a mediator of non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic nerves of the guinea-pig small intestine is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambache N, Freeman MA (1968) Atropine-resistant longitudinal muscle spasms due to excitation of non-cholinergic neurones in Auerbach's plexus. J Physiol (Lond) 199:705–728

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambache N, Verney J, Zar MA (1970) Evidence for the release of two atropine-resistant spasmogens from Auerbach's plexus. J Physiol (Lond) 207:761–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer HP, Frew R (1979) Relaxation of guinea-pig fundic strip by adenosine, adenosine triphosphate and electrical stimulation: lack of antagonism by theophylline or ATP treatment. Br J Pharmacol 67:293–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer V (1981) Distribution and types of adrenoceptors in the guinea-pig ileum: the action of α- and β-adrenoceptor agonists. Br J Pharmacol 72:201–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett MR, Burnstock G, Holman ME (1966) Transmission from intramural inhibitory nerves to the smooth muscle of the guinea-pig taenia coli. J Physiol (Lond) 182:541–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman WC, Hall MT (1970) Inhibition of rabbit intestine mediated by α- and β-adrenoceptors. Br J Pharmacol 38:399–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Bülbring E, Tomita T (1967) Properties of inhibitory potential of smooth muscle as observed in the response to field stimulation of the guinea-pig taenia coli. J Physiol (Lond) 189:299–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnstock G (1971) Neural nomenclature. Nature 229:282–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnstock G (1975) Purinergic transmission. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of Psychopharmacology 5:131–194

  • Burnstock G (1978) A basis for distinguishing two types of purinergic receptor In: Straub RW, Bolis L (eds) Cell membrane receptors for drugs and hormones. Raven Press, New York, pp 107–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnstock G, Campbell G, Satchell DG, Smythe A (1970) Evidence that adenosine triphosphate or a related nucleotide is the transmitter substance released by non-adrenergic inhibitory nerves in the gut. Br J Pharmacol 40:668–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnstock G, Satchell DG, Smythe A (1972) A comparison of the excitatory and inhibitory effects of non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic nerve stimulation and exogenously applied ATP on a variety of smooth muscle preparations from different vertebrate species. Br J Pharmacol 46:234–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell G (1971) Autonomic innervation of the lung musculature of a toad (Bufo marinus). Comp Gen Pharmacol 2:281–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaunois AL (1973) Biostatistics in pharmacology. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 675–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Furness JB (1969) An electrophysiological study of the innervation of the smooth muscle of the colon. J Physiol (Lond) 205:549–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Furness JB (1971) Secondary excitation of intestinal smooth muscle. Br J Pharmacol 41:213–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst CDS, Neild TO (1980) Evidence for two populations of excitatory receptors for noradrenaline on arteriolar smooth muscle. Nature 283:767–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec O, Mašek K, Šeferna I (1979) Post-tetanic potentiation in the innervated smooth muscle preparation of the guinea-pig ileum. Eur J Pharmacol 60:383–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosterlitz HW, Watt AJ (1963) Reflex contractions of the longitudinal muscle of isolated guinea-pig ileum resistant to the inhibitory action of morphine and hyoscine. J Physiol (Lond) 169:115–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosterlitz HW, Lydon RJ (1969) Spontaneous electrical activity and nerve-mediated inhibition in the innervated longitudinal muscle strip of the guinea-pig ileum. J Physiol (Lond) 200:126–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosterlitz HW, Lord JAH, Watt AJ (1973) Morphine receptor in the myenteric plexus of the guinea-pig ileum. In: Kosterlitz HW, Collier HOJ, Villarreal JE (eds) Agonist and antagonist actions of narcotic analgesic drugs. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuriyama H, Osa T, Toida N (1967) Nervous factors influencing the membrane activity of intestinal smooth muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 191:257–270

    Google Scholar 

  • McIlwain H (1972) Regulatory significance of the release and action of adenine derivatives in cerebral system. Biochem Soc Symp 36:69–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Okwusaba FK, Hamilton JT, Cook MA (1977) Relaxation of guinea-pig fundic strip by adenosine, adenine nucleotides and electrical stimulation: antagonism by theophylline and desensitization to adenosine and its derivatives. Eur J Pharmacol 46:181–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton DM (1979) Presynaptic inhibition of adrenergic neurotransmission by adenine nucleotides and adenosine. In: Baer HP, Drummond GJ (eds) Physiological and regulatory functions of adenosine and adenine nucleotides. Raven Press, New York, N4, pp 69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton WDM (1955) The response of the guinea-pig ileum to electrical stimulation by coaxial electrodes. J Physiol (Lond) 127:40–41P

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton WDM, Vizi ES (1969) The inhibitory action of noradrenaline and adrenaline on acetylcholine output by guinea-pig ileum longitudinal muscle strip. Br J Pharmacol 35:10–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro JA (1979) Purinergic modulation of transmitter release. J Theor Biol 80:259–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Starke K, Endo T, Taube HD (1975) Relative pre- and postsynaptic potencies of α-adrenoceptor agonists in the rabbit pulmonary artery. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 291:55–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki H, Kuriyama H (1975) Electrical and mechanical properties of longitudinal and circular muscles of the guinea-pig ileum. Jpn J Physiol 25:759–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Vizi ES, Knoll J (1976) The inhibitory effect of adenosine and related nucleotides on the release of acetylcholine. Neuroscience 1:391–398

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported in part by JSPS Japan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bauer, V., Matušák, O. & Kuriyama, H. Non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic responses to nerve stimulation of different regions of the guinea-pig small intestine. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 319, 108–114 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00503921

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00503921

Key words

Navigation