Skip to main content
Log in

Microcatalepsy and disruption of forelimb usage during operant behavior: differences between dopamine D1 (SCH-23390) and D2 (raclopride) antagonists

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an experiment designed to distinguish between the behavioral consequences of treatment with SCH-23390, a D1 dopamine receptor blocker, and raclopride, a D2 antagonist, rats were trained to perform a water-reinforced forelimb operant response. Response rate and the duration of each forelimb contact with the operandum were recorded. In addition, the durations of the rat's visits to the reward well were detected by a photobeam which was blocked by the rat's muzzle as it remained at the reward well. In a between-groups dosing design, separate groups of rats (11–13 rats/group) received SCH-23390 (0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.12 mg/kg, IP, 30 min) or raclopride (0. 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 mg/kg, IP, 30 min) for 21 consecutive days. Quantitative analyses indicated that for comparable amounts of operant rate reduction, raclopride had a significantly greater tendency than SCH-23390 to increase the duration of operant responses and to increase the maximum muzzle entry duration (i.e., to induce microcatalepsy). The results support the idea that at relatively low doses D2 antagonism is more likely than D1 antagonism to produce effects identified preclinically with extrapyramidal side effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlenius S (1991) Pharmacological evaluation of new antipsychotic drugs. In: Willner P (ed) Behavioural models in psychopharmacology: theoretical, industrial, and clinical perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp 311–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett A, Iorio LC, McQuade R, Chipkin RE (1988) Pharmacological and behavioral effects of D1 dopamine antagonists. In: Goldstein M, Fuxe K, Tabachnick I (eds) Central D1 dopamine receptors, advances in experimental medicine and biology, vol 235. Plenum Press, N.Y., pp 137–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey DE (1992) Dopamine D1 (SCH 23390) and D2 (haloperidol) antagonists in drug-naive monkeys. Psychopharmacology 107:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffin VL, Latranyi MB, Chipkin RE (1989) Acute extrapyramidal syndrome in cebus monkeys: development mediated by dopamine D2 but not D1 receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 249:769–774

    Google Scholar 

  • Damsma G, Robertson GS, Tham C-S, Fibiger HC (1991) Dopaminergic regulation of striatal acetylcholine release: importance of D1 andn-methyl-d-aspartate receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 259:1064–1072

    Google Scholar 

  • Faustman WO, Fowler SC (1982) An examination of methodological refinements, clozapine, and fluphenazine in the anhedonia paradigm. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 17:987–993

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler SC (1987) Force and duration of operant response as dependent variables in behavioral pharmacology. In: Thompson T, Dews PB, Barrett JE (eds) Neurobehavioral pharmacology, advances in behavioral pharmacology, vol 6. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp 83–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler SC, Kirkpatrick MA (1989) Behavior-decrementing effects of low doses of haloperidol result from disruptions in response force and duration. Behav Pharmacol 1:123–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler SC, Liou J-R (1992) Sensitization and tolerance to haloperidol's effects on operant behavior. Soc Neurosci Abstr 18:1534

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler SC, LaCerra MM, Ettenberg A (1986) Effects of haloperidol on the biophysical characteristics of operant responding: implications for motor and reinforcement processes. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 25:791–796

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler SC, Liao R-M, Skjoldager PD (1990) A new rodent model for neuroleptic-induced pseudoparkinsonism: low doses of haloperidol increase forelimb tremor in the rat. Behav Neurosci 104:449–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler SC, Skjoldager PD, Liao R-M, Chase JM, Johnson JS (1991) Distinguishing between haloperidol's and decamethonium's disruptive effects on operant behavior in rats: use of measurements that complement response rate. J Exp Anal Behav 56:239–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerfen CR (1992) The neostriatal mosaic: multiple levels of compartmental organization in the basal ganglia. Annu Rev Neurosci 15:285–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein M, Lew JY, Meller E (1988) Biochemical and functional characterization of central dopamine receptors. In: Goldstein M, Fuxe K, Tabachnick I (eds) Central D1 dopamine receptors, advances in experimental medicine and biology, vol 235. Plenum, N.Y., pp 43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillegaart V, Ahlenius S (1987) Effects of raclopride on exploratory locomotor activity, treadmill locomotion, conditioned avoidance behaviour and catalepsy in rats: behavioural profile comparisons between raclopride, haloperidol, and preclamol. Pharmacol Toxicol 60:350–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Iorio LC, Barnett A, Leitz FH, Houser VP, Korduba CA (1983) SCH23390, a potential benzazepine antipsychotic with unique interactions on dopamine systems. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 226:462–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Iorio LC, Cohen M, Coffin VL (1991) Anticholinergic drugs potentiate dopamine D1 but not D2 antagonists on a conditioned avoidance task in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 258:118–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick MA, Fowler SC (1989) Force-proportional reinforcement: pimozide does not reduce rats' emission of higher forces for sweeter rewards. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 32:499–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljungberg T, Enquist M (1990) Effects of dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists on decision making by rats: no reversal of neuroleptic-induced attenuation by scopolamine. J Neuroal Trans [Gen Sect] 82:167–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch MR, Carey RJ (1990) Chronic low-dose haloperidol effects on self-stimulation rate-intensity functions. Psychopharmacology 102:122–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Morelli M, Di Chiara G (1985) Catalepsy induced by SCH 23390 in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 117:179–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima S (1989) Subtypes of dopamine receptors involved in the mechanism of reinforcement. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 13:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Ögren SO, Hall H, Kohler C, Magnusson O, Sjöstrand SE (1986) The selective D2 receptor antagonist raclopride discriminates between dopamine-mediated motor functions. Psychopharmacology 90:287–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanberg PR, Bunsey MD, Giordano M, Norman AB (1988) The catalepsy test: its ups and downs. Behav Neurosci 102:748–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Senyuz L, Fowler SC (1994) Raclopride, but not SCH 23390, induces maldirected jumping in rats trained to perform a run-climb-run behavioral task. Psychopharmacology 112:518–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Surmier DJ, Reiner A, Levine MS, Ariaon MA (1993) Are neostriatal dopamine receptors co-localized? Trends Neurosci 16:299–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington JL, O'Boyle KM (1989) Drugs acting on brain dopamine receptors: a conceptual re-evaluation five years after the first selective D-1 antagonist. Pharmacol Ther 43:1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker JM, Bowen WD, Walker FO, Matsumoto RR, DeCosta B, Rice KC (1990) Sigma receptors: biology and function. Pharmacol Rev 42:355–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA, Spindler J, DeWitt H, Gerber GJ (1978) Neuroleptic-in-duced “anhedonia” in rats: pimozide blocks the reward quality of food. Science 201:262–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA (1982) Neuroleptics and operant behavior: the anhedonia hypothesis. Behav Brain Sci 5:39–87

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fowler, S.C., Liou, JR. Microcatalepsy and disruption of forelimb usage during operant behavior: differences between dopamine D1 (SCH-23390) and D2 (raclopride) antagonists. Psychopharmacology 115, 24–30 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244747

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244747

Key words

Navigation