Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of nicotine and d-amphetamine on intracranial self-stimulation in a shuttle box test in rats

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rats were permitted to turn on and off electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle, by alternating between two photobeams running along opposite walls of a shuttle box. Entry into one beam (the “ON” beam) triggered the delivery of a succession of short, regularly occurring (1 Hz) pulse trains, which could be terminated by breaking the other (“OFF” beam). The two beams were frequently reversed. When this occurred, the rat was given a free period of 10 s in which to reorient, and brain stimulation reward was then assessed by the amount of time spent receiving brain stimulation (SST) within a fixed interval of time. SST increased with increasing current intensity.

After training, subjects were tested for 10 consecutive days, alternately with saline and nicotine bitartrate (0.4 mg/kg SC base), and received a constant daily dose of the drug (0.4 mg/kg). Initially, nicotine visibly impaired motor performance for several minutes after injection, which may at least partly explain the observed reduction of SST; both effects waned across successive nicotine tests. Later in each 78 min session, nicotine consistently increased SST over a range of current, and drugged subjects entered the photobeams more frequently even when electrical stimulation was unavailable. d-Amphetamine sulphate (0.25, 0.75 mg/kg SC salt), given 15 min before testing, also increased SST and stimulated responding. The possible effects of motor impairment or activation on SST are discussed, and it is concluded that nicotine and d-amphetamine may have enhanced the rewarding properties of medial forebrain bundle stimulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atrens DM (1970) Reinforcing and emotional consequences of intracranial self-stimulation of subcortical limbic-forebrain. Physiol Behav 5:1461–1471

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassens GP, Mills AW (1973) Lithium and amphetamine: opposite effects on threshold of intracranial reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 30:283–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher SM, Butter CM (1968) Consummatory behaviours and locomotor exploration evoked from self-stimulation sites in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 66:335–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke PBS, Kumar R (1983a) The effects of nicotine on locomotor activity in non-tolerant and tolerant rats. Br J Pharmacol 78:329–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke PBS, Kumar R (1983b) Nicotine does not improve discrimination of brain stimulation reward by rats. Psychopharmacology 79:271–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke PBS, Kumar R (1983c) Characterization of the locomotor stimulant action of nicotine in tolerant rats. Br J Pharmacol 80:587–594

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot J (1959) The rat forebrain in stereotactic coordinates. Trans R Neth Acad Sci 52:No. 4

  • Domino EF, Lutz MP (1973) Tolerance to the effects of daily nicotine on rat bar pressing behaviour for water reinforcement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1:445–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry JS, Rosecrans JA (1982) The development of pharmacological tolerance to the effects of nicotine on schedule-controlled responding in mice. Psychopharmacology 77:339–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman JM, Butcher LL (1974) Comparative involvement of dopamine and noradrenaline in rate-free self-stimulation in substantia nigra, lateral hypothalamus, and mesencephalic central gray. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 284:167–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon L, Robbins TW (1975) The action of central nervous system stimulant drugs: a general theory concerning amphetamine effects. In: Essman WB, Valzelli L (eds) Current developments in psychopharmacology, vol 2. Spectrum, New York, pp 79–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison CF, Stephenson JA (1972) The occurrence of tolerance to a central depressant effect of nicotine. Br J Pharmacol 46:151–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman LM (1972) Effects of cholinergic agonists and antagonists on intracranial self-stimulation behaviour in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 79:394–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds J, Domino EF (1969) Comparison of muscarinic and nicotinic agonists on self-stimulation behaviour. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 166:189–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds ME, Olds J (1963) Approach-avoidance analysis of rat diencephalon. J Comp Neurol 120:259–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Poschel BPH, Nintemann FW (1966) Psychotropic drug effects on self-stimulation of the brain: a control for motor output Psychol Rep 19:79–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan SN (1970) Effects of nicotine on several schedules of behaviour in rats. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 183:127–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan SN, Bowling C (1971) Effects of nicotine on self-stimulation in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 176:229–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts WW (1958) Both rewarding and punishing effects from stimulation of posterior hypothalamus of cat with same electrode at same intensity. J Comp Physiol Psychol 51:400–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer GJ, Holtzman SG (1979) Free-operant and auto-titration self-stimulation procedures in the rat: a comparison of drug effects. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 10:127–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Shizgal P, Matthews G (1977) Electrical stimulation of the rat diencephalon: Differential effects of interrupted stimulation on on- and off-responding. Brain Res 129:319–333

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSSX Users Guide, SPSS Inc., McGraw-Hill, New York

  • Stitzer M, Morrison J, Domino EF (1970) Effects of nicotine on fixed-interval behaviour and modification by cholinergic antagonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 171:165–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo I, Milner PM (1972) Self-stimulation in rats: Tip alignment influences the effectiveness of bipolar electrodes. Brain Res 48:243–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenstein ES (1964) Problems of measurement and interpretation with reinforcing brain stimulation. Psychol Rev 71:415–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenstein ES, Meyers W (1964) A rate-independent test of reinforcing consequences of brain stimulation. J Comp Physiol Psychol 57:52–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanner HU, Bättig K (1966) Wirkung von Nicotin and Amphetamin auf die Selbstreizung bei der Ratte. Helv Physiol Pharm Acta 24:C122-C124

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarevics P, Setler PE (1979) Simultaneous rate-independent and rate-dependent assessment of ICSS: Evidence for the direct involvement of dopamine in brain reinforcement mechanisms. Brain Res 169:499–512

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clarke, P.B.S., Kumar, R. Effects of nicotine and d-amphetamine on intracranial self-stimulation in a shuttle box test in rats. Psychopharmacology 84, 109–114 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00432037

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00432037

Key words

Navigation