Skip to main content
Log in

A physiographic approach to land use planning

  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

Physiography has been studied in the United States for more than 75 years, but only recently has it been applied to land use planning. Advantages of a physiographic approach are that it 1) focuses on the problems at the proper scale and conserves energy, effort, and time by selecting the critical parameters, 2) stresses geologic structure and process as factors which should control land use, and 3) presents data in a form which the non-geologically trained planner can easily understand.

In 1928 Fenneman delineated and described the provinces and sections of the United States. This paper proposes a classification of smaller physiographic units and presents two examples of how they can be used for planning purposes. Below the section, the units used in this paper are the subsection, the land type, and the topographic element. Subsections delineate areas of distinct geologic structure or process whereas land types delineate ranges in the intensity of those processes. Topographic elements delineate units with distinct ranges of slopes or shapes of slopes, such as concave or convex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cleaves, E. T., and A. E. Godfrey, 1973, Geologic constraint maps for planning purposes in the Piedmont of Maryland: Geol. Soc. America, Northeast Section, Abs. with Programs, v. 5, no. 2, p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaves, E. T., W. P. Crowley, and K. R. Kuff, 1974, Towson Quadrangle: Maryland Geol. Survey, Geologic and Environmental Atlas.

  • Fenneman, N. M., 1928, Physiographic divisions of the United States: Assoc. Am. Geographers, Annals, v. 18, no. 4, p. 338–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, A. E., 1972, A field reconnaissance of mantle instability on the Manti Division of the Manti-LaSal National Forest and adjacent portion of the Fishlake National Forest: U.S. Forest Service, Price, Utah, open file report.

  • Hunt, C. B., Paul Averitt, and R. L. Miller, 1953, Geology and of the Henry Mountains Region, Utah: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. 228, 234 p.

  • Lacate, D. S., 1969, Guidelines for bio-physical land classification: Forestry Ser. Pub. no. 1264, 61 p.

  • Powell, J. W., 1876, Report on the geology of the eastern portion of Uinta Mountains and a region of country adjacent thereto: U.S. Survey of the Territories, 218 p.

  • Wertz, W. A., and J. F. Arnold, 1972, Land systems inventory: U.S. Dept. Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Utah, 12 p.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godfrey, A.E. A physiographic approach to land use planning. Geo 2, 43–50 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02430664

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02430664

Keywords

Navigation