Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological and electrophoretic studies of the genus Themisto (Amphipoda: Hyperiidea) from the South and North Atlantic

  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The genus Themisto is represented in Atlantic Ocean waters by four different species: T. compressa, T. abyssorum, and T. libellula in the northern hemisphere and T. gaudichaudii in the southern hemisphere. Examination of morphological and electrophoretic characters has revealed that T. gaudichaudii, which was previously thought to have a bipolar distribution, in fact consist of separate species in Arctic and Antarctic waters, respectively. The Antarctic species remains as T. gauchichaudii Guérin 1828 and the oldest available name for the Arctic species is T. compressa Goes 1865. The results of the study also indicate that morphological variation within T. gaudichaudii (e.g. the “compressa” and “bispinosa” forms) is more likely to be the result of environmental influences rather than genetic differences. Electrophoretic analyses of genetic variation indicate that T. gaudichaudii from waters adjacent to both South Georgia Island and the South Shetland Islands belong to the same interbreeding population. Similar observations of homogeneity in other Antarctic pelagic animals suggest that the Antarctic circumpolar current systems promote effective genetic exchange and reduce the possibility of formation of distinct local breeding populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayala, FJ (1974) Biological evolution: natural selection or random walk? Am Sci 62:692–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala FJ, Powell JR (1972) Allozymes as diagnostic characters of sibling species of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:1094–1096

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard KH (1930) Crustacea. 11. Amphipoda. Br Antarct (Terra Nova) Exped 1910, Zool 8:307–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard KH (1932) Amphipoda Discovery Rep 5:1–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Behning A (1939) Die Amphipoden-Hyperiidea der den Fernen Osten der UdSSR umgrenzenden Meere. Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol Hydrogr 38:353–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeck A (1871) Crustacea amphipoda borealia et arctica. Forh-Vidensk Selsk Christiania:83–280

  • Boeck A (1872) De Skandinaviske og arktiske Amphipoder. 1. Hefte. Christiania 85:1–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovallius C (1887) Systematical list of the Amphipoda Hyperiidea. Sven Vet Akad Handl 11:1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovallius C (1889) Contributions to a monograph of the Amphipoda Hyperiidae. 1. 2. The families Cyllopodidae, Paraphronimidae and Anchylomeridae. Kongl Svens Vetens Akad Handl 22:1–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman TE (1960) The pelagic amphipod genus Parathemisto (Hyperiidea: Hyperiidae) in the North Pacific and adjacent Arctic Ocean. Proc US Nat Mus 112:343–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman TE, Cohen AC, McGuiness MMcM (1982) Vertical distribution of Themisto gaudichaudii (Amphipoda: Hyperiidae) in Deepwater Dumpsite 106 off the mouth of Delaware Bay. Smithsonian Contr Zool 351:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana JD (1853) Crustacea. US Exploring Expedition under the command of Charles Wilkens, USN 13:687–1618

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar MJ (1954) The amphipod Crustacea of Ungava Bay, Canadian Eastern Arctic. J Fish Res Board Can 11:709–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar MJ (1964) Euphausiids and pelagic amphipods: distribution in North Atlantic and Arctic waters. Ser Atlas, Mar Environ Folio 6

  • Ekman S (1935) Tiergeographie des Meeres. Akad Verlagsges Leipzig:1–542

  • Evans F (1968) The subgenera Parathemisto and Euthemisto of the genus Parathemisto (Amphipoda, Hyperiidea). Crustaceana 14:105–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Goes A (1865) Crustacea amphipoda maris Spetsbergiam alluentis cum speciebus aliis arcticis enumerat. Ofvers Akad Förhandl 8:517–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Guérin FE (1828) Uroptère. Encycl Méth Hist Nat 10:345–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy GH (1908) Mendelian proportions in a mixed population. Science 28:49–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris H, Hopkinson DA (eds) (1976) Handbook of enzyme electrophoresis in human genetics. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam New York Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane JE (1966) The distribution of Parathemisto gaudichaudii (Guér.), with observations on its life-history in the 0° to 20°E sector of the southern ocean. Discovery Rep 34:163–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroyer H (1838) Grönlands amfipoder. K Dan Vidensk Selsk 7:229–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühl S, Schneppenheim R (1986) Electrophoretic investigation of genetic variation in two krill species Euphausia superba and Euphausia crystallorophias (Euphausiidae). Polar Biol 6:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandt MG (1822) Observationes in historiam naturalem et anatomian comparatam in itinere Groenlandico factae. Diss Berlin:1–40

  • Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106:283–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman AM (1869) Shetland final dredging report. 2. On the Crustacea, Tunicata, Echinodermata, and Porifera. Rep Br Assoc Adv Sci 1868:247–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Sars GO (1895) An account of the Crustacea of Norway, 1. Amphipoda:1–711

  • Schneppenheim R, MacDonald CM (1984) Genetic variation and population structure of krill (Euphausia superba) in the Atlantic sector of Antarctic waters and off the Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biol 3:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheader M (1975) Factors influencing change in the phenotype of the planktonic amphipod Parathemisto gaudichaudii (Guérin). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 55:887–891

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheader M, Evans F (1974) The taxonomic relationship of Parathemisto gaudichaudii (Guérin) and P. gracilipes (Norman), with a key to the genus Parathemisto. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 54:915–924

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker CR (1955) Amphipoda collected at Arctic Laboratory, Office of Naval Research, Point Barrow, Alaska by GE MacGinitie. Smithson Misc Collect 128:1–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San Franscisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbing TRR (1888) Report on the Amphipoda collected by HMS Challenger during the years 1873–76. Rep Sci Res Voy Challenger 29:1–1737

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephensen K (1923) Crustacea Malacostraca V (Amphipoda I) Dan Ingolf-Exped 3:1–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephensen K (1933) Amphipoda. Medd Grönland 79:1–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephensen K (1942) The Amphipoda of N Norway and Spitzbergen with adjacent waters. Tromsö Mus Skrifter 3:363–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinogradov ME, Volkov AF, Semenova TN (1982) Amphipoda — Hyperiidea des Weltmeeres (in Russian). Akad Nauk SSSR, Fauna SSSR, herausgegeben vom Zool Institut der Akad Nauk SSSR 132:1–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlund S (1928) Zusammensetzung von Populationen und Korrelationserscheinungen vom Standpunkt der Vererbungslehre aus betrachtet. Hereditas 11:65–106

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneppenheim, R., Weigmann-Haass, R. Morphological and electrophoretic studies of the genus Themisto (Amphipoda: Hyperiidea) from the South and North Atlantic. Polar Biol 6, 215–225 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00443398

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00443398

Keywords

Navigation