Summary
Single cells in the primary somatosensory (Sm1) cortex were investigated for responses to bilateral hindpaw stimulation in Wistar rats anaesthetised by continuous intravenous administration of Althesin. Fifty-one percent of cells sampled (N = 134) responded to equivalent punctate mechanical stimuli delivered to both the contralateral and ipsilateral hindpaws under light anaesthesia. The distribution by cortical depth of cells with receptive fields (RFs) on both hindpaws was not significantly different from cells which had only contralateral RFs. No cell was found with a purely ipsilateral RF. For 86% of cells tested (N=44) the ipsilateral RF was partly or completely homologous with areas within the contralateral RF. The sizes of ipsilateral RFs were smaller on 66% of occasions when tested against their contralateral RFs. Modal latencies to ipsilateral mechanical stimulation were longer than to contralateral stimulation (34.1±9.1 ms (S.D) cf. 26.4±7.2 ms, N=44). Ipsilateral RFs were lost for 77% of cells tested following a 33% increase in anaesthetic infusion rate. Conditioning mechanical stimuli applied to the centre receptive field (CRF) on the ipsilateral hindpaw reduced or abolished a cell's responses to equivalent test stimuli applied to it's contralateral CRF with C-T intervals of 20–200 ms. Conditioning stimuli applied to the CRF contralateral to the cell reduced or abolished responses to test stimuli on the cell's ipsilateral CRF using C-T intervals of 0–900 ms. Responses in one cortex to stimulation of the ipsilateral hindpaw were unaffected by elimination of responses from the same hindpaw in the opposite contralateral Sm1 cortex, where responses had been suppressed by topical Lignocaine administration. Retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase from hindpaw Sm1 cortex labelled many cells in homolateral thalamus, but failed to label cells in the entire forebrain contralateral to the injection site. It is concluded that direct crossed thalamocortical and callosal Sm1-Sm1 pathways do not contribute to the production of hindpaw ipsilateral receptive fields.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angel A, Lemon RN (1975) Sensorimotor cortical representation in the rat and the role of the cortex in the production of myoclonic jerks. J Physiol 248: 465–488
Armstrong-James M, Caan AW (1985) Sensory specification and laminar localisation of distinct neuronal classes in rat Sm1 neocortex. J Physiol 361: 46P
Armstrong-James M, Fox K (1983) Effects of iontophoresed Noradrenaline on the spontaneous activity of neurones in rat primary somatosensory cortex. J Physiol 355: 427–447
Armstrong-James M, Fox K (1987) Spatiotemporal convergence and divergence in the rat SI “Barrel” cortex. J Comp Neurol 263: 265–281
Armstrong-James M, George MJ (1985) Bilateral synchronous firing and receptive fields of single units in Sm1 neocortex of the Althesin-anaesthetised rat. J Physiol 360: 27P
Armstrong-James M, George MJ (1987) The influence of anaesthesia on spontaneous activity and receptive field size of single units in rat Sm1 neocortex. Exp Neurol (in press)
Baker MA (1969) Spontaneous and evoked activity of neurones in the somatosensory thalamus of the waking cat. J Physiol 217: 359–380
Baker MA, Giesler GJ (1984) Anatomical studies of the spinocervical tract of the rat. Somatosens Res 2: 1–18
Brooks VB, Rudomin P, Slayman CL (1961a) Sensory activation of neurones in the cat's cerebral cortex. J Neurophysiol 24: 286–301
Brooks VB, Rudomin P, Slayman CL (1961b) Peripheral receptive fields of neurons in the cat's cerebral cortex. J Neurophysiol 24: 302–325
Buser P, Imbert M (1961) Sensory projections to the motor cortex in cats; a microelectrode study. In: Rosenblith WA (ed) Sensory communication. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge Mass, pp 607–626
Chapin JK, Lin C-S (1984) Mapping of the body representation in the S1 cortex of the anaesthetised and awake rat. J Comp Neurol 229: 199–213
Chapin JK, Waterhouse BD, Woodward DJ (1981) Differences in the cutaneous sensory response of single somatosensory cortical neurons in awake and halothane anesthetised rats. Brain Res Bull 6: 63–70
Cohen SM, Grundfest H (1954) Thalamic loci of electrical activity initiated by afferent impulses in the cat. J Neurophysiol 17: 193–207
Curry MJ (1972) The exteroreceptive properties of neurones in the somatosensory part of the posterior group (PO). Brain Res 44: 439–462
Davidson N (1965) The projection of afferent pathways on the thalamus of the rat. J Comp Neurol 124: 377–390
Doetsch GS, Towe AL (1976) Response properties of distinct neuronal subsets in hindlimb sensorimotor cerebral cortex of the domestic cat. Exp Neurol 53: 520–547
Dreyer DA, Loe PR, Metz CB, Whitsel BL (1975) Representation of hand and face in postcentral gyrus of the macaque. J Neurophysiol 38: 714–733
Duncan GH, Dreyer DA, McKenna TM, Whitsel BL (1982) Dose and time dependant effects of ketamine on S1 neurons with cutaneous receptive fields. J Neurophysiol 47: 677–699
Dusser de Barenne JG (1937) Sensory functions of the optic thalamus of the monkey (Macacus rhesus). Symptomalogy and functional localisation investigated with the method of local strychninisation. Arch Neurol Psychiat 38: 913–926
Dykes RW (1978) The anatomy and physiology of the somatic sensory cortical regions. Prog Neurobiol 10: 33–88
Emmers R (1965) Organisation of the first and second somesthetic regions (SI and SII) in the rat thalamus. J Comp Neurol 124: 215–227
Emmers R, Crandall K (1966) Independent termination sites of the lemniscal and the spinothalamic afferents in the rat thalamus. Physiologist 9: 176
Gardner EP, Costanzo RM (1980a) Spatial integration of multiplepoint stimuli in primary somatosensory cortical receptive fields of alert monkey. J Neurophysiol 43: 420–443
Gardner EP, Costanzo RM (1980b) Temporal integration of multiple-point stimuli in primary somatosensory cortical receptive fields of alert monkey. J Neurophysiol 43: 444–468
Giesler GJ, Nahin RL, Madsen AM (1984) Post synaptic dorsal column pathway of the rat. 1. Anatomical studies. J Neuro-physiol 51: 260–275
Harding GW, Stogsdill RM, Towe Al (1979) Relative effects of pentobarbital and chloralose on the responsiveness of neurons in primary somatosensory cerebral cortex of the domestic cat. Neuroscience 4: 369–378
Harris FA (1970) Population analysis of somatosensory thalamus in the cat. Nature London 225: 559–562
Herkenham M (1980) Laminar organisation of thalamic projections in the rat neocortex. Science 207: 533–535
Hunt WE, O'Leary JL (1952) Form of thalamic response evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation. J Comp Neurol 97: 491–514
Ivy GO, Akers RM, Killackey HP (1979) Differential distribution of callosal projection neurons in the neonatal and adult rat. Brain Res 173: 532–537
Jabbur SJ, Baker MA, Towe AL (1972) Wide-field neurons in thalamic nucleus ventralis posterolateralis of the cat. Exp Neurol 36: 213–238
Kaas JH (1983) What, if anything, is S1? Organisation of the first somatosensory area of the cortex. Physiol Rev 63: 206–231
Lund RD, Webster KE (1967) Thalamic afferents from the spinal cord and trigeminal nuclei; an experimental study in the rat. J Comp Neurol 130: 313–328
Mann MD (1979) Sets of neurons in somatic cerebral cortex of the cat and their ontogeny. Brain Res Rev 1: 3–45
Manzoni T, Barbaresi P, Bellardinelli E, Caminiti R (1980) Callosal projections from the two body midlines. Exp Brain Res 39: 1–9
Mesulam MM (1978) Tetramethyl benzidine for horseradish peroxidase neurohistochemistry; a non-carcinogenic blue reaction product with superior sensitivity for visualizing neural afferents and efferents. J Histochem Cytochem 26: 106–117
Mesulam M-M, Hegarty E, Barbas H, Gower EC, Knapp AG, Moss MB, Mufson EJ (1980) Additional factors influencing sensitivity of tetramethyl benzidine method for HRP neurochemistry. J Histochem Cytochem 28: 1255–1259
Millar J, Basbaum AI, Wall PD (1976) The immediate shift of afferent drive of dorsal column nucleus cells following deafferentation: a comparison of acute and chronic deafferentation in gracile nucleus and spinal cord. Exp Neurol 52: 480–495
Mountcastle VB (1957) Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic sensory cortex. J Neurophysiol 20: 408–434
Mountcastle VB (1961) Some functional properties of the somatic afferent system. In: Rosenblith E (ed) Sensory communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 403–436
Patton HD, Towe AL, Kennedy TT (1963) Activation of pyramidal tract neurons by ipsilateral cutaneous stimuli. J Neurophysiol 25: 501–514
Paxinos G, Watson C (1982) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Academic Press, New York
Perl ER, Whitlock DG (1961) Somatic stimuli exciting spinothalamic projections to thalamic neurons in cat and monkey. Exp Neurol 3: 256–296
Poggio GF, Mountcastle VB (1960) A study of functional contributions of the leminiscal and spinothalamic systems to somatic sensibility. Central nervous mechanisms in pain. Bull John Hopkins Hosp 106: 266–316
Rosene DL, Mesulam M-M (1978) Fixation variables for HRP neurochemistry. Effects of fixation time and perfusion procedures upon enzyme activity. J Histochem Cytochem 26: 28–39
Ryugo DK, Killackey HP (1975) Corticocortical connections of the barrel field of rat somatosensory cortex. Neurosci Abstr 1: 126
Robinson DL (1973) Electrophysiological analysis of the interhemispheric relations in the second somatosensory area of the cat. Exp Brain Res 18: 131–148
Tomasulo KC, Emmers R (1970) Spinal afferents to SI and SII of the rat thalamus. Exp Neurol 26: 482–497
Tomasulo KC, Emmers R (1972) Activation of neurons in the gracile nucleus by two afferent pathways in the rat. Exp Neurol 36: 197–206
Welker C (1971) Microelectrode delineation of fine grain somatotopic organization of Sm1 cerebral neocortex in albino rat. Brain Res 26: 259–275
Wise SP, Jones EG (1978) Developmental studies of thalamocortical and commissural connections in the rat somatosensory cortex. J Comp Neurol 178: 187–208
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Armstrong-James, M., George, M.J. Bilateral receptive fields of cells in rat Sm1 cortex. Exp Brain Res 70, 155–165 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00271857
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00271857