Skip to main content
Log in

Shell structure and behaviour related to cementation in oysters

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shell microstructure and mantle behaviour relating to shell cementation was studied on adult oysters,Crassostrea gigas, Saccostrea mordax, andS. kegaki (collected from Shirahama, Wakayama Prefecture, Japan, in 1989 and 1990). At the place of cementation, the prismatic structure of the outermost shell layer is modified to a significant structure. This structure, named the ‘ridge-and-furrow structure’, consists of calcified ridges a few microns wide separated by furrows, both arranged parallel to the shell growth direction. The furrows are ultimately filled by shell material. The prismatic and ridge-and-furrow structures gradually merge in a transitional area where an intermediate type of the two structures occurs. The small size of the crystal units of the ridges and furrows is due to the close distribution of crystal seeds, especially close to pre-existing ridges. This is the basis of the difference between the ridge-and-furrow and the prismatic structures and also makes the former structure functional for cementation, in contrast to the latter. At the site of ongoing shell cementation, the mantle margin adpresses the shell margin onto the substrate. Experiments show that this pressing action is essential for cementation and probably also for the formation of the ridge-and-furrow structure. Even the right valve, which oysters nerve use to cement in natural conditions, forms the ridge-and-furrow structure and cements to the substrate if the pressing action of its mantle margin is induced under artificial conditions. Behavioural changes probably led oysters to switch from byssal attachment to cementation within a short time span when they acquired their cementing habit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beedham, G. E. (1958a). Observation on the mantle of the Lamellibranchia. Q. J. microsc. Sci. 99: 181–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Beedham, G. E. (1958b). Observations on the non-calcreous component of the shell of the Lamellibranchia. Q. J. microsc. Sci. 99: 341–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Carriker, M. R., Palmer, E. P., Prezant, R. S. (1980). Functional ultramorphology of the dissoconch valve of the oysterCrassostrea virginica. Proc. natn. Shellfish. Ass. 70: 139–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. G. (1990). Skeletal biomineralization: patterns, processes and evolutionary trends. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. G., Clark, G. R. II (1985). Classification and phylogenetic significance of molluscan shell microstructure. In: Bottjer, D. J., Hickmann, C. S., Ward, P. D. (eds.) Mollusks, notes for a short course, 13. University of Tennessee, Department of Geological Science, Orlando, Florida, USA, p. 50–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranfield, H. J. (1973a). A study of the morphology, ultrastructure, and histochemistry of the foot of the pediveliger ofOstrea edulis. Mar. Biol. 22: 187–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranfield, H. J. (1973b). Observations on the behavior of the pediveliger ofOstrea edulis during attachment and cementing. Mar. Biol. 22: 203–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranfield, H. J. (1973c). Observations on the function of the glands of the foot of the pediveliger ofOstrea edulis during settlement. Mar. Biol. 22: 210–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranfield, H. J. (1974). Observations on the morphology of the mantle folds of the pediveliger ofOstrea edulis L. and their function during settlement. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 54: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranfield, H. J. (1975). The ultrastructure and histochemistry of the larval cement ofOstrea edulis L. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 55: 497–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire, C. (1972) Structure of the molluscan shell. In: Florkin, M., Scheer, A. T. (eds.) Chemical zoology, Vol 7. Mollusca. Academic Press, New York, p. 45–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruffydd, L. D., Lane, D. J. W., Beaumont, A. R. (1975). The glands of the larval foot inPecten maximus L. and possible homologues in other bivalves. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 55: 463–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, E. M. (1992). Post-larval cementation in the Ostreidae and its implication for other cementing bivalvia. J. mollusc. Stud. 58: 37–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Korringa, P. (1951). On the nature and function of “Chalky” deposits in the shell ofOstrea edulis. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. (Ser. 4) 27 (5): 133–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, N. D. (1960). The origin of the oysters. Proceedings of the International Paleontological Union, Part XXII, Report of 21th Session of International Geological Congress, Copenhagen, p. 81–86

  • Orton, J. H., Amirthalingam, C. (1927). Notes on shell-depositions in oysters. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 14: 935–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, H., Davis, W., Jones, R. (1978). Morphological studies on the mantle of the fresh-water musselAmblema (Unionidae): scanning electron microscopy. Tissue Cell 104: 619–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Purchon, R. D. (1968). The biology of the Mollusca. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleuddin, A. S. M., Petit, H. P. (1983). The mode of formation and the structure of periostracum. In: Saleuddin, A. S. M., Wilbur, K. M. (eds.) The Mollusca, Vol. 4. Physiology, Part 1. Academic Press, New York, p. 199–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenzel, H. B. (1971). Oysters. In: R. C. Moore (ed.) Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Part N. Mollusca 6, Bivalvia, Vol. 3. Geological Society of American Inc., Boulder, Colorado, p. 953–1224

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, S., Togo, Y., Hikida, Y. (1993). Using Meigen's staining for aragonite-calcite identification in fossil molluscan shells under the scanning electron microscope. J. geol. Soc. Japan 99: 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. D., Kennedy, J. M., Hall, A. (1969). The shell structure and mineralogy of the Bivalvia-Introduction, Nucleacea-Trigonacea. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (D. Zool.) 3: 1–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. D., Kennedy, W. J. (1969). The influence of the periostracum on the shell structure of bivalve molluscs. Calcif. Tissue Res. 3: 274–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, K. M., Saleuddin, A. S. M. (1983). Shell formation. In: Wilbur, K. M. (ed.). The Mollusca, Vol. 4 Physiology, Part 1. Academic Press, New York, p. 235–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonge, C. M. (1979). Cementation in bivalves. In: Van De Spoel, S., Van Bruggen, A. C., Lever, J. (eds.) Pathways in malacology. Bohn, Scheltema, Holkema, and Junk, Utrecht, p. 83–106

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by T. Ikeda, Nagasaki

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamaguchi, K. Shell structure and behaviour related to cementation in oysters. Mar. Biol. 118, 89–100 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00699222

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00699222

Keywords

Navigation