Skip to main content
Log in

The pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in cirrhotic patients with ascites

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We have compared in two separate studies the kinetics of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in 8 cirrhotic patients with ascites and 8 control subjects after a single 20 min intravenous infusion of 1 g of each drug.

The apparent volumes of distribution (Vz) were found to be significantly higher in cirrhotics than in control subjects (0.87, versus 0.49, l·kg−1, for cefotaxime and 0.23 versus 0.13 for ceftriaxone).

The elimination kinetics of ceftriaxone were similar in the two groups. In contrast, the total and non-renal clearances of cefotaxime were reduced in cirrhotic patients.

The two drugs rapidly entered the ascitic fluid. Peritoneal concentrations of ceftriaxone were higher than 7 µg·ml−1 from the second hour after the infusion and were 8.9 µg·ml−1 at 24 h. Peritoneal concentrations of cefotaxime were higher than 4 µg·ml−1 from 0.5 to 8 h after the infusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clumeck N, Estenne M, Vanhoof R, Reding R, Cornil A (1979) Septicémie et péritonite “spontanée” chez le cirrhotique. Presse Med 8: 2655–2658

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoefs JC, Canawati HN, Sapico FL, Hopkins RR, Weiner J, Montgomerie JZ (1982) Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Hepatology 2: 399–407

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caralis PV, Sprung CL, Schiff ER (1984) Secondary bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients with ascites. South Med J 77: 579–583

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carmine AA, Brogden RN, Heel RC, Speight TM, Avery GS (1983) Cefotaxime: A review of its activity, pharmacological properties and therapeutic use. Drugs 25: 223–289

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richards DM, Heel RC, Brogden RN, Speight TM, Avery GS (1984) Ceftriaxone. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacological properties and therapeutic use. Drugs 27: 469–527

    Google Scholar 

  6. Trautmann KH, Haefelfinger P (1981) Determination of Ro 13-9904 in plasma, urine and bile by means of ion-pair reversed phase chromatography. J High Resol Chromatogr Commun 4: 54–59

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hary L, Andrejak M (1987) Dosage du cefotaxime et du désacetylcéfotaxime sériques par chromatographie liquide haute performance avec appariement d'ions. J Chromatogr 419: 396–400

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hayton WL, Stoeckel K (1986) Age-associated changes in ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet 11: 76–86

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stoeckel K, Tuerk H, McNamara PJ, Trueb V (1984) Single-dose ceftriaxone kinetics in liver insufficiency. Clin Pharmacol Ther 36: 500–509

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arvidsson A, Alvan G, Anvelin B, Borga O, Nord CE (1982) Ceftriaxone renal and biliary excretion and effect on colon microflora. J Antimicrob Chemother 10: 207–215

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stoeckel K, McNamara PJ, Brandt R, Plozza-Nottebrock H, Ziegler WH (1981) Effects of concentration-dependent plasma protein binding on ceftriaxone kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 29: 650–657

    Google Scholar 

  12. Höffken G, Lode H, Koeppe P, Ruhnke M, Bornen K (1984) Pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime and desacetyl-cefotaxime in cirrhosis of the liver. Chemotherapy 30: 7–17

    Google Scholar 

  13. Benoni G, Arosio E, Raimondi MG, Pancera P, Lechi A, Velo P (1985) Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and ceftriaxone and taheir penetration into the ascitic fluid. J Antimicrob Chemother 16: 267–273

    Google Scholar 

  14. Regamey C (1985) Pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone and its relation to concentrations in extravascular compartments. Comparison with cefotaxime. Chemotherapy 31: 85–94

    Google Scholar 

  15. Felisart J, Rimola H, Arnozo V, Perez-Ayuso RM, Quintero E, Gines P, Rodes J (1985) Cefotaxime is more effective than is ampicillin-tobramycin in cirrhotis with severe infections. Hepatology 5: 457–462

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cabrera J, Arroyo V, Ballesta A, Rimola A, Gual J, Elena M, Rodes J (1982) Aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity in cirrhosis. Value of urinary β-microglobulin to discreminate functional renal failure from acute tubular domage. Gastroenterology 82: 97–102

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moore RD, Smith CR, Lipsky JJ, Mellits ED, Lietman PS (1984) Risk factors for nephrotoxicity in patients treated with aminoglycosides. Ann Intern Med 100: 352–357

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cardey J, Silvain C, Bouquet S, Breux JP, Becq-Giraudon B, Fourtillan JP, Beauchant M (1987) Oral pharmacokinetics and ascitic fluid penetration of pefloxacin in cirrhosis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 33: 469–472

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hary, L., Andrejak, M., Leleu, S. et al. The pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in cirrhotic patients with ascites. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 36, 613–616 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00637745

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00637745

Key words

Navigation