Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of a prescription based record-linkage model for epidemiological studies of long-term adverse effects of drugs — with special regard to combined oral contraceptives

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The Department of Drugs of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare undertook a study of the possibilities of a new scheme for post-marketing surveillance by means of prescription and register based epidemiological studies, primarily of combined oral contraceptives (COC). Based on available data on COC usage patterns and incidence rates of the disease at study, it was estimated that study periods, including the necessary time periods for disease development and generation of a sufficient number of cases, would amount to at least 1 to 13 years for cardiovascular outcomes and 8 to 17 years for reproductive cancers. Prospective and unbiased exposure ascertainment would be the most important advantage. However, delay in follow up, the need for extensive individual questionnaire probing and fear of violation of personal integrity could adversely affect the feasibility of the scheme. Chiefly on the grounds of the extended study periods and magnitude of the necessary infrastructure, it was not judged cost-effective to pursue such a scheme for COC exposure only. It was, however, suggested that it would be considered for epidemiological surveillance of other drugs that are commonly used and for which short term and frequent serious side effects are expected, as for instance lipid lowering compounds, beta-blockers, bensodiazepines and other psychotropic drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moir D (1981) Drug monitoring. Br Med J 282: 632–634

    Google Scholar 

  2. Westerholm B (1987) The rational for a post-marketing surveillance. Hum Reprod 2: 41–44

    Google Scholar 

  3. Report E (1982) Women and children — interviews with women about family and work. Official Statistics of Sweden. National Bureau uf Statistics, Stockholm, pp 38–41

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mishell DR Jr (1989) Contraception. N Engl J Med 320: 777–787

    Google Scholar 

  5. Editorial (1989) Cancer risk of oral contraception. Lancet I: 21–22

  6. Guidelines for the toxicological and clinical assessment and post-registration surveillance of steroidal contraceptive drugs (1987) WHO Special Programme of Research, Development Reseand arch Training in Human Reproduction, WHO Geneva

  7. Knopp RH (1986) Arteriosclerosis risk. The roles of oral contraceptives and postmenopausal estrogens. J Reprod Med 31: 913–921

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stadel BV (1981) Oral contraceptives and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 612–618

  9. Stadel BV (1981) Oral contraceptives and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 672–677

  10. Meirik O, Lund E, Adami H-O, Bergström R, Christoffersen T, Bergsjö P (1986) Oral contraceptive use and breast cancer in young women. Lancet II: 650–654

    Google Scholar 

  11. The CASH study (1983) Oral contraceptive use and risk of endometrial cancer. JAMA 249: 1600–1604

    Google Scholar 

  12. The CASH study (1983) Oral contraceptive use and the risk of ovarian cancer. JAMA 249: 1596–1599

    Google Scholar 

  13. Forman D, Vincent TJ, Doll R (1986) Cancer of the liver and the use of oral contraceptives. Br Med J 292: 1357–1361

    Google Scholar 

  14. The In-Patient Registry, National Board of Health and Welfare (1972), Spri Report 18/72, Stockholm, Sweden

  15. The Swedish Cancer Registry, Cancer Incidence in Sweden, (1984) National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden

  16. The Causes of Death Registry (1986) National Bureau of Statistics, Stockholm, Sweden

  17. The Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study (1978) Oral contraceptives, venous thrombosis, and varicose veins. J R Coll Gen Pract 28: 393–399

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vessey M, Doll R, Peto R, Johnson B, Wiggins P (1976) A long-term follow-up study of women using different methods of contraception — an interim report. J Biosoc Sci 8: 373–427

    Google Scholar 

  19. Casagrande JT, Pike MC, Smith PG (1978) An improved approximate formula for calculating sample sizes forcomparing two binomial distributions. Biometrics 34: 483–6

    Google Scholar 

  20. Skegg DCG (1988) Reviews and Commentary. Potential for bias in case-control studies of oral contraceptives and breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 127: 205–212

    Google Scholar 

  21. Persson I, Adami H-O, Johansson E, Lindberg B, Manell P, Westerholm B (1983) A cohort study of oestrogen treatment and the risk of endometrial cancer: evaluation of method and its applicability. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 25: 625–632

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oral contraceptives and health (1974) The RCGP Study. ISBN 0272 793426

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by grants from the National Board of Health and Welfare, Department of Drugs and National Corporation of Pharmacies, Sweden

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Persson, I., Adami, H.O., Norell, S.E. et al. Evaluation of a prescription based record-linkage model for epidemiological studies of long-term adverse effects of drugs — with special regard to combined oral contraceptives. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 40, 489–493 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315228

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315228

Key words

Navigation