Summary
Interobserver agreement in assessing brain CT-scans is, in general, high. The extent, however, to which such agreement is caused by bias through knowledge of other clinical details remains uncertain. The hypothesis that observers are somehow prejudiced before assessing ambiguous CT-scans in this particular situation was tested. Sixteen neurologists and 16 radiologists volunteered to interpret two ambiguous brain CT-scans, with regard to the presence or absence of a lacunar infarct in the region of the internal capsule. The scans were accompanied by “patient” information that was or was not suggestive of a stroke. These scans were camouflaged by a variety of other scans, to be assessed in the same way, to mask the purpose of the study. It was assumed that the observers, in their assessments of the scans, would somehow let their ratings of the likelihood of a lacunar infarction in or near the internal capsule be subject to the accompanying information. Results showed lower ratings produced by neurologists (i. e., less likelihood of an infarction) than by radiologists in the majority of all assessments, but no bias by the accompanying information.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Longstreth WT, Koepsell TD, van Belle G (1987) Clinical neuroepidemiology. I. Diagnosis. Arch Neurol 44:1091–1099
Lee D, Vinuela F, Pelz D, Lau C, Donald A, Merskey H (1987) Interobserver variation in computed tomography of the brain. Arch Neurol 44:30–31
Shinar D, Gross CR, Hier DB, Caplan LR, Mohr JP, Price TR, Wolf PA, Kase CS, Fishman IG, Barwick JA, Kunitz SC (1987) Interobserver reliability in the interpretation of computed tomographic scans of stroke patients. Arch Neurol 44:149–155
Van Gijn J, Bonke B (1977) Interpretation of plantar reflexes: biasing effect of other signs and symptoms. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40:787–789
Teasdale G, Teasdale E (1987) Should the clinical details of patients be revealed to neuroradiologists? In: Warlow CP, Garfield J (eds) More dilemmas in the management of the neurological patient. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 204–208
Mohr JP (1983) Lacunes. Neurol Clin 1:201–228
Kappelle LJ, Van Gijn J (1986) Lacunar infarcts. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 88:3–17
Runkel PJ, McGrath JE (1972) Research on human behavior. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonke, B., Koudstaal, P.J., Dijkstra, G. et al. Detection of lacunar infarction in brain CT-scans: no evidence of bias from accompanying patient information. Neuroradiology 31, 170–173 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00698848
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00698848