Skip to main content
Log in

MRI of extradural spinal tumours at 0.3 T

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology (Spine)
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ninety-one patients with extradural spinal tumours were examined by magnetic resonance imaging. There were 76 metastases (6 from unknown primary tumours). Seven patients had primary spinal tumours and 8 had multiple myeloma. Sixteen had bulging, diseased vertebral bodies compressing the subarachnoid space and 67 had extradural tumour compressing the spinal cord. Sixty patients had paravertebral involvement. Intraspinal involvement did not correlate with the extent of spinal lesions. All patients had vertebral destruction, with hypointense or combined hypo- and isointense signal relative to bone marrow on T1-weighted images. In most of the 22 patients with T2-weighted images the tumours were isointense or slightly hyperintense. It was usually impossible to differentiate the various tumours on the basis of signal intensity and morphology. However, metastases from carcinoma of the prostate were often more hypointense than other tumours on T1- and T2-weighted images. An inhomogeneous pattern in which diffusely low signal is combined with focal lower signal on T1-weighted images may suggest myeloma. In the 22 patients examined with both T1- and T2-weighted images, T1-weighted images gave the best information in 18; in 3 they were equivalent and in 1 inferior to T2-weighted images; they are therefore recommended for routine imaging of epidural spinal tumours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McNeil BJ (1984) Value of bone scanning in neoplastic disease. Semin Nucl Med 14: 277–286

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dorwart RH, LaMasters DL, Watanabe TJ (1983) Tumors. In: Newton TH, Potts DG (eds) Computed tomography of the spine and spinal cord. Clavadel Press, San Anselmo, pp 115–147

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gero B, Sze G (1990) Nondegenerative diseases of the spine. Curr Opin Radiol 2: 48–61

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smoker WRK, Godersky JC, Knutzon RK, Keyes WD, Norman D, Bergman W (1987) The role of MR imaging in evaluating metastatic spinal disease. AJNR 8: 901–908

    Google Scholar 

  5. Williams MP, Cherryman GR, Husband JE (1989) Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected metastatic spinal cord compression. Clin Radiol 40: 286–290

    Google Scholar 

  6. Avrahami E, Tadmor R, Dally O, Hadar H (1989) Early MR demonstration of spinal metastases in patients with normal radiographs and CT and radionuclide bone scans. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13: 598–602

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carmody RF, Yang PJ, Seeley GW, Seeger JF, Unger EC, Johnson JE (1989) Spinal cord compression due to metastatic disease: diagnosis with MR imaging versus myelography. Radiology 173: 225–229

    Google Scholar 

  8. Colman LK, Porter BA, Redmond J III, Olson DO, Stimac GK, Dunning DM, Friedl KE (1988) Early diagnosis of spinal metastases by CT and MR studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12: 423–426

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daffner RH, Lupetin AR, Dash N, Deeb ZL, Sefczek RJ, Schapiro RL (1986) MRI in the detection of malignant infiltration of bone marrow. AJR 146: 353–358

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lukin R (1989) Neuroimaging: 1990. Semin Roentgenol 24: 218–230

    Google Scholar 

  11. Batson OV (1957) The vertebral vein system. AJR 78: 195–212

    Google Scholar 

  12. Olson DO, Shields AF, Scheurich CJ, Porter BA, Moss AA (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging of the bone marrow in patients with leukemia, aplastic anemia and lymphoma. Invest Radiol 21: 540–546

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yuh WTC, Zachar CK, Barloon TJ, Sato Y, Sickels WJ, Hawes DR (1989) Vertebral compression fractures: distinction between benign and malignant causes with MR imaging. Radiology 172: 215–218

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hedberg MC, Dranger BP, Flom RA, Hodak JA, Bird CR (1988) Gradient echo (Grass) MR imaging in cervical radiculopathy. AJR 150: 683–689

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van Dyke C, Ross JS, Tkach J, Masaryk TJ, Modic MT (1989) Gradient echo MR imaging of the cervical spine: evaluation of extradural disease. AJNR 10: 627–632

    Google Scholar 

  16. Winkler ML, Ortendahl DA, Mills TC, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE, Kaufman L, Kramer DM (1988) Characteristics of partial flip angle and gradient reversal MR imaging. Radiology 166: 17–26

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holtås S, Ståhlberg F, Nilsson H, Larsson E-M, Ericsson A (1989) Low flip angle gradient echo MR imaging of the cervical spine at 0.3 T. Acta Radiol 30: 343–348

    Google Scholar 

  18. Manelfe C (1991) Imaging of the spine and spinal cord. Curr Opin Radiol 3: 5–15

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sze G, Krol G, Zimmerman RD, Deck MDF (1988) Malignant extradural spinal tumors: MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. Radiology 167: 217–223

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fruehwald FXJ, Tscholakoff D, Schwaighofer B, Wicke L, Neuhold A, Ludwig H, Hajek PC (1988) Magnetic resonance imaging of the lower vertebral column in patients with multiple myeloma. Invest Radiol 23: 193–199

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, M.H., Holtås, S. & Larsson, E.M. MRI of extradural spinal tumours at 0.3 T. Neuroradiology 35, 370–374 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00588373

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00588373

Key words

Navigation