Skip to main content
Log in

Revision surgery for lumbar disc herniation

An analysis of 45 patients

  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We reviewed 45 patients who had undergone repeated open operations for lumbar disc herniation. There were 26 men and 19 women with a mean follow up of 4.3 years. Twenty-four patients had had one previous discectomy, 12 had 2, and 9 had 3 or more; 11 needed a fusion without instrumentation. Residual or re-extruded disc hernias, either sub- or transligamentous, were frequently found at revision. Good to excellent results were obtained in 64%. Those who had a first-time revision had earlier improvement and better results. Complete removal and a thorough search for herniated disc material is essential when carrying out the initial operation for extruded or sequestrated herniation. At revision, removal of as much as possible of the remaining nucleus and annulus, but with minimal invasion of the posterior elements, is crucial for improving the outcome.

Résumé

Notre étude porte sur 45 patients ayant subi à plusieurs reprises une discectomie lombaire. Ce groupe était composé de 26 hommes et de 19 femmes suivis pendant 4,3 ans en moyenne (de 1 à 8 ans). Vingt-quatre patients avaient déjà été opérés une fois, 12 deux fois et 9 trois fois ou plus. Une arthrodèse était indiquée dans 11 cas. Les réinterventions ont montré que des hernies résiduelles ou ré-expulsées, sous-ligamentaires ou trans-ligamentaires, étaient souvent retrouvées. 64% (29/45) des patients ont eu de bons ou d'excellents résultats. Les patients n'ayant subi qu'une seule réintervention se sont rétablis plus rapidement et ont présenté de meilleurs résultats. Nous tenons à souligner qu'il est essentiel de procéder à l'ablation complète et à la recherche méticuleuse de tous les matériaux discaux herniés lors de la première intervention, en particulier pour les hernies expulsées ou séquestrées. En cas de réintervention il convient d'enlever autant d'anneau et de noyau résiduel que possible, quoique plus modérément en arrière, pour obtenir les meilleurs résultats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. An HS, Vacaro A, Simeone FA, Balerston RA, O'Neill D (1990) Herniated lumbar disc in patients over the age of fifty. J Spinal Disord 3: 143–146

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balderston RA, Gilyard GG, Jones AA, Wiesel SW, Spengler DM, Bigos SJ, Rothman RH (1991) The treatment of lumbar disc herniation: simple fragment excision versus disc space curettage. J Spinal Disord 4: 22–25

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beyer HK, Hotzinger H, Oppel U, Todt C (1989) Wert der Kernspintomographie mit Gadolinium-DTPA bei der Diagnostik des lumbalen Postdiscotomie-Syndromes. Digitale Bilddiagn 9: 22–30

    Google Scholar 

  4. Connolly ES (1992) Surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Clin Neurosurg 39: 211–216

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cosnard G, Cordoliani YS, Pharaboz C, Jeanbourquin D, Ducolombier A, Schill H (1991) Le rehaussement discal après injection en IRM. Macroscopie et histologie de 25 récidives postopératoires. J Radiol 72: 563–574

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dhar S, Porter RW (1992) Failed lumbar spinal surgery. Int Orthop 16: 152–156

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ebeling U, Kalbarcyk H, Reulen HJ (1989) Microsurgical reoperation following lumbar disc surgery. Timing, surgical findings, and outcome in 92 patients. J Neurosurg 70: 397–404

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fandino J, Botana C, Viladrich A, Gomez-Bueno J (1993) Reoperation after lumbar disc surgery: results in 130 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 122: 102–104

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fankhauser H, Mansouri B, de Tribolet N (1986) Reintervention après cure de hernie discale. Confrontation entre radiologie et constatation opératoire dans 18 cas. Neurochir 32: 52–55

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer J, Mohsenipour I (1985) Zur Entstehung von Rezidiven nach lumbalen Bandscheibenoperationen. Neurochir (Stutt) 28: 221–217

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fitting PL, Fankhauser H, de Tribolet N (1989) Results of 137 reoperations following treatment of lumbar disk hernia: the significance of osseous stenosis. Actuel Probl Chir Orthop 35: 48–59

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hanley EN Jr, Shapiro DE (1989) The development of low-back pain after excision of a lumbar disc. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 71: 719–721

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herron L (1994) Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: results of repeat laminectomy and discectomy. J Spinal Disord 7: 161–166

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffman RM, Wheeler KJ, Deyo RA (1993) Surgery of herniated lumbar discs: a literature synthesis. J Gen Intern Med 8: 487–496

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hopp E, Tsou PM (1988) Postdecompression lumbar instability. Clin Orthop 227: 143–151

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kamitani K, Baba H, Shimada T, Chiba H (1993) Electrophysiologic analysis of the lumbosacral radiculopathy using nerve root conduction velocity and cauda equina action potentials. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 67: 631–643 [English abstract]

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lahde S, Ilkko E (1988) CT features of recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Eur J Radiol 8: 247–248

    Google Scholar 

  18. Long DM (1992) Decision making in lumbar disc disease. Clin Neurosurg 39: 36–51

    Google Scholar 

  19. Markwalder TM, Battaglia M (1993) Failed back surgery syndrome. Part I: analysis of the clinical presentation and results of testing procedures for instability of the lumbar spine in 171 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 123: 46–51

    Google Scholar 

  20. McCulloach JA (1991) Microdiscectomy. In: Frymoyer JW, Ducker TB, Kostuik JP, Weinstein JN, Whitecloud TS III (eds) The adult spine: principle and practice. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Murayama S, Numaguchi Y, Gupta KL, Lee N (1991) Wide anulus rent appearance on axial MR imaging: a sign of postdiscectomy recurrent disk herniation. Radiat Med 9: 9–13

    Google Scholar 

  22. O'Sullivan MG, Connolly AE, Buckley TF (1990) Recurrent lumbar disc protrusion. Br J Neurosurg 4: 319–325

    Google Scholar 

  23. Papavero L, Caspar W (1993) The lumbar micro-discectomy. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl) 251: 34–37

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reith C, Lausberg G, Wildfoster U (1989) Ätiologie lumbaler Bandscheibenvorfallrezidive. Neurochir 32: 5–9

    Google Scholar 

  25. Roca J, Moreta D, Ubierna MT, Caceres E, Gomez JC (1993) The results of surgical treatments of lumbar arachnoiditis. Int Orthop 17: 77–81

    Google Scholar 

  26. Selecki BR, Ness TD (1982) Multiple operations for lumbar disc herniation. Aust New Zeal J Surg 52: 230

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sotiropoulos S, Chafetz NI, Lang P, Winkler M, Morris JM, Weinstein PR, Genant HK (1989) Differentiation between postoperative scar and recurrent disk herniation: prospective comparison of MR, CT, and contrast-enhanced CT. AJNR 10: 639–643

    Google Scholar 

  28. Waldis M, Suezawa Y, Sgier F (1989) Reoperation nach Bandscheibeneingriff. Actuel Probl Chir Orthop 35: 99–101

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baba, H., Chen, Q., Kamitani, K. et al. Revision surgery for lumbar disc herniation. International Orthopaedics 19, 98–102 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00179969

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00179969

Keywords

Navigation