Summary
Canine blood lymphocytes were nonlytically separated on antibody-coated petri dishes into surface immunoglobulin-positive (SIg+) and -negative (SIg−) populations. SIg− cells were further separated into cells reactive or non-reactive with monoclonal antibody DT-2 recognizing canine T lymphocytes. The purity of the three enriched lymphocyte populations exceeded 90% as assessed by immunofluorescence.
Mitogen stimulation showed a vigorous response of SIg+ cells to pokeweed mitogen and concanavalin A but only a weak response to phytohemagglutinin. In mixed lymphocyte cultures, SIg+ cells were poor responders but potent stimulators. DT-2− and DT-2+ cells responded to phytohemagglutinin, concanavalin A and pokeweed mitogen, and both populations were good responders in mixed leukocyte culture. Only DT-2− cells were potent stimulators; DT-2+ cells were not. Hence, canine blood T cells can be divided into two subsets, DT-2+ and DT-2−, both of which are responsive to mitogens and alloantigens.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson K, Deeg HJ, Storb R, Weiden PL, Gerhard-Miller L, Torok-Storb BJ, Seigneuret M, Thomas ED (1980) Canine lymphocyte subpopulations. Exp Hematol 8: 821–829
Deeg HJ, Storb R (1981) Functional dichotomy of canine thoracic duct lymphocytes: Proliferation in mixed leukocyte culture and unresponsiveness to plant lectins. J Reticuloendothel Soc 29: 395–405
Fisher AG, Brown G (1980) A rapid method for determining whether monoclonal antibodies react with the same or different antigens on the cell surface. J Immunol Methods 39: 377–385
Huber C, Merkenschlager M, Gattringer C, Royston I, Fink U, Braunsteiner H (1982) Human autologous mixed lymphocyte reactivity is specific for xenoprotein determinants adsorbed to antigen-presenting cells during rosette formation with SRBC. J Exp Med 155: 1222–1227
Janossy G, Greaves MF (1971) Lymphocyte activation. I. Response of T and B lymphocytes to phytomitogens. Clin Exp Immunol 9: 483–489
Mage MG, McHugh LL, Rothstein TL (1977) Mouse lymphocytes with and without surface immunoglobulin: Preparative scale separation in polystyrene tissue culture dishes coated with specifically purified antiimmunoglobulin. J Immunol Methods 15: 47–56
Mage M, Mathieson B, Sharrow S, McHugh L, Hammerling U, Kanellopoulos-Langevin C, Brideau D, Thomas CA (1981) Preparative nonlytic separation of Lyt 2+ and Lyt 2− T lymphocytes, functional analyses of the separated cells and demonstration of synergy in graft-vs.-host reaction of Lyt 2+ and Lyt 2− cells. Eur J Immunol 11: 228–235
Mellstedt H (1975) In vitro activation of human T and B lymphocytes by pokeweed mitogen. Clin Exp Immunol 19: 75–82
Pichler WI, Lum L, Broder S (1978) Fc-receptor on human T lymphocytes. I. Transition of Ty to Tu cells. J Immunol 121: 1540–1548
Rosenstreich DL, Farrar JJ, Dougherty S (1976) Absolute macrophage dependency of T lymphocytes by mitogens. J Immunol 116: 131–137
Unanue ER (1974) Cellular events following binding of antigen to lymphocytes. Am J Pathol 77: 2–20
Van Wauwe JP, de Mey JR, Goossens JG (1980) OKT3: A monoclonal antihuman T lymphocyte antibody with potent mitogenic properties. J Immunol 124: 2708–2713
Weksler ME, Kuntz MM (1976) Synergy between human T and B lymphocytes in their response to phytohemagglutinin and pokeweed mitogen. Immunology 31: 273–281
Wulff JC, Deeg HJ, Storb R (1982) A monoclonal antibody (DT-2) recognizing canine T lymphocytes. Transplantation 33: 616–620
Wysocki LJ, Sato VL (1978) “Panning” for lymphocytes: a method for cell selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75: 2844–2848
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by Grants CA 31787, CA 15704, CA 28941, and CA 18221 awarded by the National Cancer Institute, DHHS
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wulff, J.C., Tsoi, MS., Aprile, J. et al. Stimulation of canine lymphocyte subpopulations separated nonlytically by monoclonal anti-T and polyclonal Anti-B cell antibodies. Blut 45, 309–316 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319524
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319524