Skip to main content
Log in

Stimulation of canine lymphocyte subpopulations separated nonlytically by monoclonal anti-T and polyclonal Anti-B cell antibodies

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Blut Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Canine blood lymphocytes were nonlytically separated on antibody-coated petri dishes into surface immunoglobulin-positive (SIg+) and -negative (SIg) populations. SIg cells were further separated into cells reactive or non-reactive with monoclonal antibody DT-2 recognizing canine T lymphocytes. The purity of the three enriched lymphocyte populations exceeded 90% as assessed by immunofluorescence.

Mitogen stimulation showed a vigorous response of SIg+ cells to pokeweed mitogen and concanavalin A but only a weak response to phytohemagglutinin. In mixed lymphocyte cultures, SIg+ cells were poor responders but potent stimulators. DT-2 and DT-2+ cells responded to phytohemagglutinin, concanavalin A and pokeweed mitogen, and both populations were good responders in mixed leukocyte culture. Only DT-2 cells were potent stimulators; DT-2+ cells were not. Hence, canine blood T cells can be divided into two subsets, DT-2+ and DT-2, both of which are responsive to mitogens and alloantigens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkinson K, Deeg HJ, Storb R, Weiden PL, Gerhard-Miller L, Torok-Storb BJ, Seigneuret M, Thomas ED (1980) Canine lymphocyte subpopulations. Exp Hematol 8: 821–829

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deeg HJ, Storb R (1981) Functional dichotomy of canine thoracic duct lymphocytes: Proliferation in mixed leukocyte culture and unresponsiveness to plant lectins. J Reticuloendothel Soc 29: 395–405

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher AG, Brown G (1980) A rapid method for determining whether monoclonal antibodies react with the same or different antigens on the cell surface. J Immunol Methods 39: 377–385

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huber C, Merkenschlager M, Gattringer C, Royston I, Fink U, Braunsteiner H (1982) Human autologous mixed lymphocyte reactivity is specific for xenoprotein determinants adsorbed to antigen-presenting cells during rosette formation with SRBC. J Exp Med 155: 1222–1227

    Google Scholar 

  5. Janossy G, Greaves MF (1971) Lymphocyte activation. I. Response of T and B lymphocytes to phytomitogens. Clin Exp Immunol 9: 483–489

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mage MG, McHugh LL, Rothstein TL (1977) Mouse lymphocytes with and without surface immunoglobulin: Preparative scale separation in polystyrene tissue culture dishes coated with specifically purified antiimmunoglobulin. J Immunol Methods 15: 47–56

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mage M, Mathieson B, Sharrow S, McHugh L, Hammerling U, Kanellopoulos-Langevin C, Brideau D, Thomas CA (1981) Preparative nonlytic separation of Lyt 2+ and Lyt 2 T lymphocytes, functional analyses of the separated cells and demonstration of synergy in graft-vs.-host reaction of Lyt 2+ and Lyt 2 cells. Eur J Immunol 11: 228–235

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mellstedt H (1975) In vitro activation of human T and B lymphocytes by pokeweed mitogen. Clin Exp Immunol 19: 75–82

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pichler WI, Lum L, Broder S (1978) Fc-receptor on human T lymphocytes. I. Transition of Ty to Tu cells. J Immunol 121: 1540–1548

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenstreich DL, Farrar JJ, Dougherty S (1976) Absolute macrophage dependency of T lymphocytes by mitogens. J Immunol 116: 131–137

    Google Scholar 

  11. Unanue ER (1974) Cellular events following binding of antigen to lymphocytes. Am J Pathol 77: 2–20

    Google Scholar 

  12. Van Wauwe JP, de Mey JR, Goossens JG (1980) OKT3: A monoclonal antihuman T lymphocyte antibody with potent mitogenic properties. J Immunol 124: 2708–2713

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weksler ME, Kuntz MM (1976) Synergy between human T and B lymphocytes in their response to phytohemagglutinin and pokeweed mitogen. Immunology 31: 273–281

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wulff JC, Deeg HJ, Storb R (1982) A monoclonal antibody (DT-2) recognizing canine T lymphocytes. Transplantation 33: 616–620

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wysocki LJ, Sato VL (1978) “Panning” for lymphocytes: a method for cell selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75: 2844–2848

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by Grants CA 31787, CA 15704, CA 28941, and CA 18221 awarded by the National Cancer Institute, DHHS

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wulff, J.C., Tsoi, MS., Aprile, J. et al. Stimulation of canine lymphocyte subpopulations separated nonlytically by monoclonal anti-T and polyclonal Anti-B cell antibodies. Blut 45, 309–316 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319524

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319524

Key words

Navigation