Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic accuracy in remote expert consultation using standard video-conference technology

  • Computer Applications
  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An international multicenter study (Germany Sweden, and Switzerland) was performed to investigate the feasibility and diagnostic of standard video-conferencing (VC) technology for remote expert consultation in radiology. Three high spatial resolution films (hand-bone, mammography, chest) and two low-spatial-resolution image sets (liver CT and MR1) were studied (total 446 images taken from different examinations).

The images were recordedby a video camera transmitted via public broadband networks, and displayed on a video monitor. The resolution of the recorded images varied from 24 lp mm to 4.8 lp/mm at maximum zoom. Alter 3–4 months, the images were reexamined using conventional light-box reading. Diagnostic reliability was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. With video conferencing, there was a noticeable loss of diagnostic accuracy for the high-spatial-resolution films, whereas for liver CT and liver MRIimages VC reading seemed to be satisfactory (average area value difference < 0.02)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Webber MM, Wilk S, Pirruccello R, Aiken J (1973) Telecommunication of images in the practice of diagnostic radiology. Radiology 109: 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  2. DiSantis DJ, Cramer MS, Scatarige JC (1987) Excretory urography in the emergency department: utility of teleradiology. Radiology 164: 363–364.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lear JL, Manco-Johnson M, Feyerabend A, Anderson G, Robinson D (1989) Ultra-high-speed teleradiology with ISDN technology. Radiology 171: 862–863.

    Google Scholar 

  4. BERKOM (1991) Breitbandkommunikation im Glasfasernetz — übersicht und Zusammenfassung 1986–1991. R. v. Decker, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dorfman DD, Alf E Jr (1968) Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory — a direct solution. Psychometrica 33: 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dorfman DD, Alf E Jr (1969) Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory and determination of confidence intervals data. J Math Psychol 6: 487–496.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ogilivie JC, Creelman CD (1968) Maximum likelihood estimation of ROC curve parameters. J Math Psychol 5: 339–377.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Metz CE, Wang PL, Kronman HB (1984) A new appraoch for testing the significance of differences between ROC curves measured from correlated data. In: Deconick F (ed) Information processing in medical imaging. Martinus Nijhoff, Hague, pp 432–445.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fraser RG, Sanders C, Barnes GT, MacMahon H, Giger ML, Doi K, Templeton AW, Cox GG, Dwyer SJ III,Merritt CRB, Jones JP (1989) Digital imaging of the chest. Radiology 171: 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  10. MacMahon H, Vyborny CJ, Metz CE, Doi K, Sabeti V, Solomon SL (1986) Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: An ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance. Radiology 158: 21–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Giger ML, Doi K (1987) Effect of pixel size on detectability of low-contrast signals in digital radiography. J Opt Soc Am 4: 966–975.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foley WD, Wilson CR, Keyes GS et al. (1981) The effect of varying spatial resolution on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary nodules. Radiology 141: 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gajewski H, Reiss KH (1974) Physik und Technik der Weichstrahldiagnostik. Radiologe 1449: 438–446.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Millis RR, Path MRC, Davis R, Stacey AJ (1976) The detection and significance of calcification in the breast: a radiological and pathological study. Br J Radio1 49: 12–26.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Klein J (1979) Zur filmmammographischen Nachweisbarkeitsgrenze von Mikroverkalkungen. RöFo 131,2: 205–210.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Metz CE (1978) Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 8: 283–298.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Wegryn SA, Piraino DW, Richmond BJ, Schluchter MD, Uetani M, Freed HA, Meziane MA, Belhobek GA (1990) Comparison of digital and conventional musculoskeletal radiography: an observer performance study. Radiology 175: 225–228.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dawood RM, Craig JOMC, Highman JH (1989) Clinical diagnosis from digital displays: preliminary findings of the St. Mary's evaluation project. Clin Radiol 40: 369.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Murphey MD (1989) Digital skeletal radiography: spatial resolution requirements for detection of subperiostal resorption. Am J Roentgenol 152: 541–546.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nilsson U, Nyman U, Nilsson M (1986) Teletransmission of radiographic images. Preliminary report. Acta Radiol [Diagn] (Stockh)27: 357–360.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kagetsu NJ, Zulauf DR, Ablow RC (1987) Clinical trial of digital teleradiology in the practice of emergency room radiology. Radiology 165: 551–554.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gershon-Cohen J, Cooley AG (1950) Telegnosis. Radiology 55: 582–587.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gayler BW, Gitlin JN, Rappaport W, Skinner FL, Cerva J (1981) Teleradiology: an evaluation of a microcomputer-based system. Radiology 140: 355–360.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gitlin JN (1986) Teleradiology. Radiol Clin North Am 24: 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gitlin JN (1989) Storage, retrieval, and transmission of diagnostic quality digital images. In: Lemke HU, Rhodes ML, Jaffe CC, Felix R (eds) Proceedings CAR `89 - Third International Symposium on Computer Assisted Radiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 481–482.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Heiska K, Kiuru A, Karkkainen A (1989) Hospital requirements on PACS and state-of-the-art of experimental PACS installations. RACE/MultiMed project report (42NTT/JV/DS/A/D08/b1), Comm Eur Comm, DG XIII, Brussels.

  27. Huang HK (1990) Advances in medical imaging. Ann Intern Med 112: 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Franken EA Jr, Smith WL, Berbaum KS, Kao SC, Sato Y (1991) Comparison of a PACS workstation with conventional film for interpretation of neonatal examinations: a paired comparison study. Pediatr Radiol 21: 336–340.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stewart BK, Lou SL, Wong WK, Huang HK (1991) An ultrafast network for communication of radiologic images. Am J Roentgenol 156: 835–839.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Huang HK, Taira RK (1992) Infrastructure design of a picture archiving and communication system. Am J Roentgenol 158: 743–749.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krause, M., Brado, M., Schosser, R. et al. Diagnostic accuracy in remote expert consultation using standard video-conference technology. Eur. Radiol. 6, 932–938 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240711

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240711

Key words

Navigation