Skip to main content
Log in

Assay evaluability of drug testing systems determined with human renal carcinoma cell lines

  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Of 39 human kidney carcinoma transplanted to nude mice, four tumor lines were maintained on nude mice by serial transplantation. The established tumor cell lines were used to determine the assay evaluability of three different drug-testing systems: the subrenal capsule assay (SRC), the in vitro assay with labeled DNA precursor (L-DNA-P) and the stem cell assay (STC). Tumor cell lines were used because they allowed us to perform the different assays with the same tumor. Criteria for assay evaluability were measurable growth of the transplanted tumor fragment (histologically proved) in the SRC-assay, the amount of thymidine incorporation in relation to the number of cells in vitro and time of incubation in the L-DNA-P-assay, and a mean colony count for the sixfold plated cells of 50 or greater in the STC-assay. The criteria for evaluability were fulfilled when athymic or irradiated immunocompetent mice were used for the SRC-assay. However, in immunocompetent, non-irradiated mice, remarkable incursion of host cells was found. In the L-DNA-P-assay, optimal incorporation was reached after different times of culture, with different cell numbers. Therefore the technique of assaying with labeled DNA precursor lacks optimally defined assay conditions. The tumor cell lines examined in the stem cell assay demonstrated excellent growth; they therefore may be useful for pharmacological studies of drug interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrez MV, Kovach JS, Lieber MM (1982) Cell aggregates in the soft agar “human tumour stem-cell assay”. Br J Cancer 46:880–887

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alley MC, Uhl CB, Lieber MM (1982) Improved detection of drug cytotoxicity in the soft agar colony formation assay through use of a metabolizable tetrazolium salt. Life Sci 31:3071–3078

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arai T, Okamoto K, Terao K, Tokita H, Sekimoto K, Fukushima T, Tanaka K (1977) Effectiveness of antitumor agents against human tumors in nude mice. Fischer, Stuttgart, pp 461–474 (Proc 2nd Int Workshop on Nude Mice)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bogden AE, Kelton DE, Cobb WR, Esber HJ (1978) A rapid screening method for testing chemotherapeutic agents against human tumor xenografts. In: Houchens DP, Ovejera AA (eds) Proceedings of the Symposium on the Use of Athymic Nude Mice in Cancer Research. Fischer, New York Stuttgart, pp 231–250

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carney DN, Gazdar AF, Bunn PA Jr, Guccion IJ (1981) Demonstration of the stem-cell nature of clonogenic tumor cells from lung cancer patients. Stem Cells 1:149–164

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flanagan SP (1966) Nude, a new hairless gene with pleiotropic effects in the mouse. Genet Res 8:295–309

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fleischmann J, Heston WDW, Fair WR (1983) Renal cell carcinoma and the clonogenic assay. J Urol 130:1060–1062

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giovanella BC, Stehlin JS, Williams IJ, Lee SS, Shepard RC (1978) Heterotransplantation of human cancers into nude mice: a model system for human cancer chemotherapy. Cancer 42:2269–2281

    Google Scholar 

  9. Giovanella BC, Stehlin JS, Shepard RC, Williams LJ (1983) Correlation between response to chemotherapy of human tumors in patients and in nude mice. Cancer 52:1146–1152

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hagemeijer A, Höhn W, Smit EME (1979) Cytogenetic analysis of human renal carcinomal cell lines of common origin (NC-65). Cancer Res 39:4662–4667

    Google Scholar 

  11. Höhn WF, Schröder FH (1978) Renal cell carcinoma: two new cell lines and a serially transplantable nude mouse tumour (NC-65). Invest Urol 16:106–112

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson PA, Rossof AH (1983) The role of the human tumor stem cell assay in medical oncology. Arch Intern Med 143:111–114

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kurth KH, Weissglas GM, Romijn JC, Schröder FH, van Dongen JW (1983) In vitro and in vivo chemotherapeutic testing of human renal carcinoma in the nude mouse. Aktuel Urol 14:223–229

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lieber MM, Kovach JS (1981) Soft agar clonogenic assay for primary renal carcinoma: in vitro chemotherapy drug sensitivity testing. Invest Urol 19:111–114

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lieber MM (1984) Soft agar colony formation assay for in vitro chemotherapy sensitivity testing of human renal cell carcinoma: Mayo Clinic experience. J Urol 131:391–393

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nomura T, Ohsawa N, Tamaoki N, Fujiwara K (1977) List of human tumors transplanted to nude mice. Fischer, Stuttgart, pp 588–595 (Proc of the 2nd Int Workshop on Nude Mice)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Otto U, Klöppel G, Baisch H (1984) Transplantation of human renal cell carcinoma into NMRI nu/nu mice. I. Reliability of an experimental tumor model. J Urol 131:130–133

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pantelouris EM (1968) Absence of a thymus in a mouse mutant. Nature 217:370–371

    Google Scholar 

  19. Salmon SE, Hamburger AW, Soehnlen B, Durie BGM, Alberts DS, Moon TE (1978) Quantification of differential sensitivity of human tumor stem cells to anticancer drugs. N Engl J Med 298:1321–1327

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sarosdy MF, Lamm DL, Radwin HM, Von Hoff DD (1982) Clonogenic assay and in vitro chemosensitivity testing of human urologic malignancies. Cancer 50:1332–1338

    Google Scholar 

  21. Selby P, Heyderman E, Gibbs J, Peckham MJ (1979) A human testicular teratoma serially transplanted in immune-deprived mice. Br J Cancer 39:578–583

    Google Scholar 

  22. Selby P, Buick RN, Tannock I (1983) A critical appraisal of the “human tumor stem-cell assay”. N Engl J Med 308:129–134

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shrivastav S, Bonar RA, Stone KR, Paulson DF (1980) An in vitro assay procedure to test chemotherapeutic drugs on cells from human solid tumors. Cancer Res 40:4438–4442

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shorthouse AJ, Smyth JF, Steel GG, Ellison M, Mills J, Peckham MJ (1980) The human tumor xenograft — a valid model in experimental chemotherapy? Br J Surg 67:715–722

    Google Scholar 

  25. van Steenbrugge GJ, Blankenstein MA, Bolt-de Vries J, Romijn JC, Schröder FH, Vihko P (1983) Effect of hormone treatment on prostatic acid phosphatase in serially transplantable human prostatic adenocarcinoma (PC-82). J Urol 129:630–633

    Google Scholar 

  26. Trent JM, Salmon SE (1980) Human tumor karyology: marked analytic improvement by short-term agar culture. Br J Cancer 41:867–874

    Google Scholar 

  27. Von Hoff DD, Johnson E (1979) Secretion of tumor markers in the human tumor transplanted to nude mice. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res/Am Soc Clin Oncol 20:51 (abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Von Hoff DD, Casper J, Bradley E, Trent JM, Soehnlen B, Alberts D, Schmidt HJ (1980) Direct cloning of human neuroblastoma cells in soft agar culture. Cancer Res 49:3591–3597

    Google Scholar 

  29. Von Hoff DD (1983) Send this patient's tumor for culture and sensitivity. N Engl J Med 308:154–155

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by a Grant from the “Nierstichting”, The Netherlands

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kurth, K.H., van Dongen, J.W., Romijn, J.C. et al. Assay evaluability of drug testing systems determined with human renal carcinoma cell lines. World J Urol 2, 146–155 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328096

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328096

Keywords

Navigation