Skip to main content
Log in

The mainz-pouch (mixed augmentation ileum 'n zecum) for bladder augmentation and continent diversion

  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The ideal urinary reservoir constructed from bowel material should be a low-pressure system with a high capacity, capable of preventing upper tract deterioration resulting from ureteral obstruction or reflux. It should achieve reliable control of continence and assure easy emptying of the reservoir. In the Mainz-pouch, the combination of cecum and ileum, the latter of which is able to absorb pressure waves created by the cecum, produces a low-pressure system with a high capacity immediately postoperatively. By incorporating large bowel in our pouch, ureteral implantation can be done using a simple and reliable standard antireflux technique with a submucosal tunnel. The Mainz-pouch has been done since 1983 in 26 patients. Of these 11 were for bladder augmentation after subtotal cystectomy and 15 for continent urinary diversion. All of the patients with bladder augmentation are completely dry day and night; 2 patients with myelomeningocele are on intermittent catheterization for bladder evacuation. The remainder void spontaneously without significant residual urine. Of 15 patients with Mainz-pouch urinary diversion, 4 had an alloplastic stomal prosthesis implanted for control of continence and 11 have isoperistaltic ileo-ileal invagination, where by the invagination valve can easily be fixed to the intussuscepting ileum by sutures or staples. Of the 4 alloplastic stomal prostheses, 2 have been removed because of infection. In 1 of these patients, an ileo-ileal invagination was performed in the same operation to achieve continent closure. All patients with the invagination valve, as well as the 2 patients with an alloplastic stomal prosthesis, are completely continent, but in 3 cases, revision of the ileo-ileal invagination became necessary due to prolapse of the valve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Botto H, Thebaut Y, Richard F, Guerin M, Camey M (1985) Urodynamic findings in enterocystoplasty after radial cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer. Poster at the XXth Congress of the International Society of Urology, Vienna, June 23–28 (Abstr no 599)

  2. Benchekroun A (1985) The continent ileo-cecal bladder. Motion picture at the 8th Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association, Atlanta, May 12–16 (Abstr no 661). J Urol 133:279A

  3. Winter CC (1984) Overview: Caution needed in cystoplasty. In: Whitehead ED, Leiter E (eds) Current operative urology. Harper & Row, Philadelphia, 2nd ed, p 837

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rutkowski M (1899) Zur Methode der Harnblasenplastik. Zentralbl Chir 26:473

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tasker JH (1953) Ileo-cystoplasty: A new technique. An experimental study with report of a case. Br J Urol 25:349

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goodwin WE, Winter CC, Baker WF (1959) “Cup-patch” technique of ileocystoplasty for bladder enlargement or partial substitution. Surg Gynecol Obstet 108:240

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mathisen W (1955) Open-loop sigmoido-cystoplasty. Acta Chir Scand 110:227

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kock NG (1969) Intraabdominal “reservoir” in patients with permanent ileostomy. Preliminary observations on a procedure resulting in fecal “continence” in five ileostomy patients. Arch Surg 99:223

    Google Scholar 

  9. Norlén L, Trasti H (1978) Functional behaviour of the continent ileum reservoir for urinary diversion. An experimental and clinical study. Scand J Urol Nephrol, Suppl 49:33

  10. Riedmiller H, Becht E, Hertle L, Jacobi GH, Hohenfellner R (1984) Psoas-hitch ureteroneocystostomy: experience with 181 cases. Eur Urol 10:145

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wilbert DM, Hohenfellner R (1984) Colonic conduit. Preoperative requirements, operative technique, postoperative management. World J Urol 2:159

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lilien OM, Camey M (1984) 25-year experience with replacement of the human bladder (Camey procedure). J Urol 132:886

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith GI, Hinman F Jr (1955) The intussuscepted ileal cystostomy. J Urol 73:261

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kock NG, Nilson AE, Nilsson LO, Norlén LJ, Philipson BM (1982) Urinary diversion via a continent ileal reservoir: Clinical results in 12 patients. J Urol 128:469

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thüroff J W, Alken P, Engelmann U, Riedmiller H, Jacobi GH, Hohenfellner R (1985) Der Mainz-Pouch zur Blasenerweiterungsplastik und kontinenten Harnableitung. Akt Urol 16:1

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thüroff JW, Alken P, Engelmann U, Riedmiller H, Jacobi GH, Hohenfellner R (in press) The Mainz-pouch (mixed augmentation ileum 'n cecum) for bladder augmentation and continent urinary diversion. Eur Urol

  17. Thüroff JW, Alken P, Riedmiller H, Engelmann U, Jacobi GH, Hohenfellner R (1985) The Mainz-pouch (mixed augmentation ileum 'n zecum) for bladder augmentation and continent diversion. J Urol 11:152

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lamesch A, Dociu N (1984) Blasenersatz durch ein kontinentes ileocolisches Darmreservoir mit Antirefluxplastik — Experimentelle Studie am Hund. Langenbecks Arch Chir 363:57

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ashken MH (1982) Urinary reservoirs. In: Urinary diversion. Ashken MH (ed) Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 112–139

    Google Scholar 

  20. Månnson W (1984) The continent caecal reservoir for urine. Thesis. Scand J Urol Nephrol: Suppl. 85:1

  21. Skinner DG, Boyd SD, Lieskovsky G (1984) Clinical experience with the Kock continent ileal reservoir for urinary diversion. J Urol 132:1101

    Google Scholar 

  22. Riedmiller H (1984) Alloplastische Stomaprothese zur kontinenten supravesikalen Harnableitung. Eine tierexperimentelle Studie. Thesis, Mainz

  23. Engelmann U, Feldermann TPF, Scott FB (1985) Evaluation of the artificial sphincter AMS 800 for continent urinary diversion. Urology 25:620

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thüroff, J.W., Alken, P., Riedmiller, H. et al. The mainz-pouch (mixed augmentation ileum 'n zecum) for bladder augmentation and continent diversion. World J Urol 3, 179–184 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00326990

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00326990

Keywords

Navigation