Skip to main content
Log in

Parenchyma-sparing surgery for renal tumors

Experiences in over 120 patients

  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Between 1969 und 1989 conservative surgery for kidney tumors was performed in 123 patients. In 49 patients there was an imperative indication for a parenchyma-sparing operation because nephrectomy would have made dialysis obligatory. Thirty-five of these 49 patients show no signs of tumor progression after a mean follow-up of 4.5 years. Known metastases were present in 3 of 6 patients who died as a result of their tumors. In two patients there was a recurrence after 1 and 5 years, respectively, requiring a second organ-preserving operation. In one further patient we suspect that multiple small tumor lesions may be present 2 years after the first operation. In 74 patients with a healthy contralateral kidney the tumor was enucleated by choice (elective indication). Sixty-eight of these 74 patients show no signs of tumor progression after a mean follow-up period of 3.3 years. One patient died from tumor metastases. Two patients had tumor recurrence, requiring nephrectomy and enucleation, respectively. Fifty-seven enucleated tumors were available for image analysis DNA cytometry. Only the two patients with a hypertriploid tumor died from their cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bazeed MA, Schärfe T, Becht E, Jurincic C, Alken P, Thüroff JW (1986) Conservative surgery of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 12:238–243

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennington JL (1973) Cancer of the kidney-etiology, epidemiology and pathology. Cancer 32:1017

    Google Scholar 

  3. Curry NS, Schabel SI, Betrill WL (1986) Small renal neoplasms: diagnostic imaging, pathologic features and clinical course. Radiology 158:113–117

    Google Scholar 

  4. Driel-Kuller AMJ van, Mesker WE, Velzen I van, Tanke HJ, Feichtinger J, Ploem JS (1985) Preparation of monolayer smears from paraffin embedded tissue for image cytometry. 6:268–272

  5. Hedley DW, Riedlander MC, Taylor IU, Ruge CA, Musgrove EA (1983) Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin embedded pathological material using flow cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem 21:1333–1335

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobs SC, Berg SJ, Lawson RK (1980) Synchronous bilateral renal cell carcinoma. Total surgical excision. Cancer 46:2341

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ljungberg B, Duchek M, Hielala SO, Roos G, Stenling R (1988) Renal cell carcinoma in a solitary kidney: late nephrectomy after 35 years and analysis of tumor deoxyribonucleic acid content. J Urol 139:350

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ljungberg B, Stenling R, Roos G (1986) Prognostic value of deoxyribonucleid acid content in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 136:801–804

    Google Scholar 

  9. Malek RS, Omess PJ, Benson RC, Zincke H (1987) Renal cell carcinoma in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. Am J Med 82:236

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marberger M, Pugh RC, Auvart J, Bertermann H, Constantin A, Gammelgard PA, Petterson S, Wickham JE (1981) Conservative surgery of renal cell carcinoma. The EIRSS experience. Br J Urol 53:53

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marshall FF, Taxy JB, Fishman EK, Chang R (1986) The feasibility of surgical enucleation for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 135:231

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer F (1979) Iterative image transformation for an automatic screening of cervical smears. J Histochem Cytochem 27:128–135

    Google Scholar 

  13. Morgan WR, Zincke H (1990) Progression and survival after renalconserving surgery for renal cell carcinoma: experience in 104 patients and extended follow-up. J Urol 144:852

    Google Scholar 

  14. Novick AC, Stewart BH, Straffon RA, Banowsky RA (1977) Partial nephrectomy in the treatment of renal adenocarcinoma. J Urol 118:932

    Google Scholar 

  15. Obsan CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W (1969) The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 101:297

    Google Scholar 

  16. Petritsch PH, Rauchenwald M, Zechner O, Ludvik W, Pummer K, Urlesberger H, Eberle G, Joos H, Kaufmann F, Kugler W, Decriotoforo A, Dittel EE (1990) Results after organ-preserving surgery for renal cell carcinoma. An Austrian multicenter study. Eur Urol 18:84

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ploem JS, Driel-Kulker AMJ van, Verwoerd NP (1987) Leytas, a cytology screening system using the new modular image analysis computer (MIAC) from Leitz. In: Burger, Ploem, Goerttler (eds) Clinical cytometry and histometry. Academic Press, London, pp 24–35

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robson CJ (1963) Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 89:37

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schärfe T, Becht E, Klippel K-F, Jacobi G-H, Hohenfellner R (1986) Active immunotherapy of stage IV renal cell cancer using autologous tumor cells. World J Urol 3:245–248

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schild HH, Schweden F (1989) Computertomographie in der Urologie, 1st edn. Thieme Stuttgart New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Skinner DG, Clowin RB, Vermillion CD, Pfister HC, Leadbetter WF (1971) Diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinoma: a clinical and pathologic study of 309 cases. Cancer 28:1165

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sparwasser C, Bach D, Sparwasser H, Altwein JE (1984) Das bilaterale Hypernephrom. Akta Urol 15:312

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stöckle M, Störkel S, Miehlke R, Steinbach F, Galler E, Riedmiller H, Hohenfellner R (1990) Charakterisierung konservativ operierter Nierentumoren mit der automatisierten DNS-Bildzytometrie. Akt Urol 21:173–180

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stöckle M, Tanke HJ, Voges G, Riedmiller H, Hohenfellner R (1989) DNA histogram of invasive bladder carcinoma: comparison of flowcytometry and automated image analysis vol 3. In: Rübben, Jacobi, Jocham (eds) Investigative urology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 107–114

    Google Scholar 

  25. Takatera H, Maeda O, Oka T, Namiki M, Nakana E, Matsoda M, Arita N, Jamshidi J, Ushio Y, Sonoda T (1988) Solitary late recurrence of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 136:799–800

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tanke HJ, Ploem JS, Jonas U (1982) Kombinierte Durchflußzytophotometrie und Bildanalyse zur automatisierten Zytologie von Blasenepithel und Prostata. Akt Urol 13:109–115

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tanke HJ, Ingen EM van, Ploem JS (1979) Acriflavin-Feulgen stilbene staining: a procedure for automated cervical cytology with a television based system (Leytas). J Histochem 27:84–86

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thoenes W, Störkel S, Rumpel H-J (1986) Histopathology and classification of renal cell tumors (adenomas, oncocytomas and carcinomas). The basic cytological and histopathological elements and their use for diagnostics. Pathol Res Pract 181:125–143

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vermillion CD, Skinner DG, Pfister RC (1979) Bilateral renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 108:219–222

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wehle MJ, Grabstald H (1986) Contraindications to needle aspirations of a solid renal mass: Tumor dissemination by renal needle aspiration. J Urol 136:446–448

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steinbach, F., Stöckle, M., Thüroff, J.W. et al. Parenchyma-sparing surgery for renal tumors. World J Urol 9, 178–183 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182837

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182837

Keywords

Navigation