Skip to main content
Log in

The electrosensitivity of the isolated ampulla of lorenzini in the dogfish

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Threshold currents as function of temperature were determined on the isolated Lorenzinian ampullae of the dogfish. Currents were applied via microelectrodes in the orifice of the ampullary canal. Response frequencies of single afferent units were averaged for at least 100 successive identical stimulus pulses by means of autocorrelation functions and periodograms. The threshold was defined by a 10% change of response frequency caused by the stimulus.

  2. 2.

    The lowest threshold current for the single ampulla was found to be about 0.01 nA at temperatures between 13 °C and 19 °C. This current corresponded to a current density of ca. 8 nA/cm2, or to a potential difference of 2 μV between the ampullary canal and the grounded exterior.

  3. 3.

    There was a strong temperature dependence of electrosensitivity of the ampulla: the threshold currents increased with lower (7 °C) and higher temperatures (25 °C) by a factor of about 10.

  4. 4.

    The threshold currents found by computer averaging were smaller by a factor of at least 10 than those given up to now for the single isolated ampulla, and corresponded well to the values estimated in behavioural experiments on the living animal. This fact might be explained by spatial summation in the electrosensory system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akoev, G.N., Ilyinsky, O.B.: Some functional characteristics of the electroreceptors (ampullae of Lorenzini) of elasmobranchs. Experientia (Basel)29, 293–294 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Akoev, G.N., Ilyinsky, O.B., Zadan, P.M.: Responses of electroreceptors (Ampullae of Lorenzini) of skates to electric and magnetic fields. J. comp. Physiol.106, 127–137 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, H.B., Levick, W.R.: Three factors limiting the reliable detection of light by retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J. Physiol. (Lond.)200, 1–24 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M.V.L.: Electroreception. In: Fish physiology (W.S. Hoar, D.J. Randall, ed.), Vol. 5, pp. 493–547. New York: Academic Press 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromm, B., Hensel, H., Nier, K.: Responses of the ampullae of Lorenzini to static combined electric and thermal stimuli inScyliorhinus canicula. Experientia (Basel)31, 615–618 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, T.H.: Seeing the world through a new sense; electroreception in fish. Amer. Sci.61, 316–325 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkgraaf, S., Kalmijn, A.J.: Verhaltensversuche zur Funktion der Lorenzinischen Ampullen. Naturwissenschaften49, 400 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fühner, H.: Speisungsflüssigkeit für Selachierherzen. J. allg. Physiol.8, 485–492 (1908)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiss, W.D., Milne, D.C.: Single fibres of cat optic nerve: “threshold” to light. Science155, 1571–1572 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensel, H.: Quantitative Beziehungen zwischen Temperaturreiz und Aktionspotentialen der Lorenzinischen Ampullen. Z. vergl. Physiol.37, 509–526 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, A.J.: Electroreception in sharks and rays. Nature (Lond.)212, 1232–1233 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, A.J.: The electric sense of sharks and rays. J. exp. Biol.55, 371–383 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, A.J.: The detection of electric fields from inanimate and animate sources other than electroorgans. In: Handbook of sensory physiol., Vol. III/3, (Fessard, A., ed.), pp. 147–200 Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissmann, H.W., Machin, K.E.: The mechanism of object location inGymnarchus niloticus and similar fish. J. exp. Biol.35, 451–486 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissmann, H.W., Machin, K.E.: Electric receptors in a non electric fish (Ciarias). Nature (Lond.)199, 88–89 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R.W.: The response of the ampullae of Lorenzini to combined stimulation by temperature change and weak direct currents. J. Physiol. (Lond.)145, 1–13 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R.W.: The response of the ampullae of Lorenzini of elasmobranchs to electrical stimulation. J. exp. Biol.39, 119–128 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R.W.: Electroreceptor mechanisms: The relation of impulse frequency to stimulus strength and responses to pulsed stimuli in the ampullae of Lorenzini of elasmobranchs. J. Physiol. (Lond.)180, 592–606 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Obara, S., Bennett, M.V.L.: Mode of Operation of Ampullae of Lorenzini of the Skate,Raja. J. gen. Physiol.60, 534–557 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rommel, S.A., McCleave, J.D.: Oceanic electric fields: perception by American eels. Science176, 1233–1235 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand, A.: The function of the ampullae of Lorenzini with some observations on the effect of temperature on sensory rhythm. Proc. roy. Soc. B125, 124–533 (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltman, B.: Electrical properties and fine structure of the ampullary canals of Lorenzini. Acta physiol. scand., Suppl.264, 1–60 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A preliminary report was given by Bromm, Hensel, and Tagmat 1975

Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

The experiments were performed at the Biologische Anstalt Helgoland. We wish to thank Prof. Dr. O. Kinne for his hospitality and support, Mr. J.-K. Holtmann for his help during the adaptation procedure, and Mrs. v. Rehren and Miss Walter for technical assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bromm, B., Hensel, H. & Tagmat, A.T. The electrosensitivity of the isolated ampulla of lorenzini in the dogfish. J. Comp. Physiol. 111, 127–136 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00605528

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00605528

Keywords

Navigation