Skip to main content
Log in

Single cell responses from the optic tectum of the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata castanotis Gould)

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Responses of neurons of the optic tectum, the prominent, highly laminated mesencephalic station of the tectofugal visual pathway in birds, to computer-generated and other visual stimuli were examined in zebra finches. Our study shows that the contralateral retina projects to the tectum in topographic order. The representation of the visual field is tilted against the horizon by 22°. The representation of the contralateral hemifield extends to the ipsilateral side by 15°. Most neurons have receptive fields with excitatory centres of different shapes and inhibitory surround. A new type of neuronal receptive field is described which has an excitatory centre and a surround which is movement sensitive and preferably excited by very small spots. The first type of neurons is mostly located in upper tectal layers, the latter only in deeper layers. Excitatory centre sizes increase with depth, and there is a tendency of smaller receptive fields in the foveal region. The representation of the frontal visual field does not show specializations which could be expected if it were used for fixation of grain during pecking. Our results are in accordance with previous behavioural experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Accepted: 30 April 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, A., Engelage, J. & Bischof, HJ. Single cell responses from the optic tectum of the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata castanotis Gould). J Comp Physiol A 185, 69–79 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590050367

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590050367

Navigation