Summary
-
1.
A series of preliminary experiments are conducted to determine the most convenient quantity of food mantids must receive in order to ensure a long life span and a high level of striking.
-
2.
In other series of experiments the dynamic components of the strike are analysed. Preparatory movements tend to place the animal in an optimum position for striking and probably integrate a mechanism for estimating distances. Movements during the strike itself include the sudden displacement of the predatory legs and the lunge, i.e. a sudden thrust which takes place simultaneously with the movement of the predatory legs. An especial study of this latter component is presented. Computation previous to strike has to take this lunge into account in order to hit successfully.
-
3.
The maximum motivation distance to strike lies between 70–80% of the foreleg length. Optimum hitting is achieved at a distance that represents 30–40% of foreleg extension. The gap between these two distances, i.e. 70–80% and 30–40%, is filled by the lunge. When the lunge is prevented by immobilizing the animal, a dramatic increase in the number of misses occurs.
-
4.
There is a relationship between the maximum motivation distance to strike and optimum distance to hit, on the one hand, and the salient anatomical features of the grasping mechanism and the length of the forelegs, on the other hand.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Holling, C. S.: The analysis of complex population processes. Canad. Entomologist 96, 335–347 (1964).
Maldonado, H.: The control of attack by Octopus. Z. vergl. Physiol. 47, 656–674 (1964).
—, and L. Levin: Distance estimation and the monocular cleaning reflex in praying mantis. Z. vergl. Physiol. 56, 258–267 (1967).
Maynard, D. M., and H. C. Howland: Dynamics of the optomotor response in mantis. 9th Internat. Ethological Conference Zürich 1965.
Mittelstaedt, H.: Regelung und Steuerung bei der Orientierung der Lebewesen. Regelungstechnik 10, 226–232 (1954).
—: Prey capture in mantids. Recent advances in invertebrate physiology, p. 51–71. Oregon: University of Oregon Publ. 1957.
Rilling, S., H. Mittelstaedt, and K. D. Roeder: Prey recognition in the praying mantis. Behaviour 14, 164–184 (1959).
Roeder, K. D.: A physiological approach to the relation between prey and predator. Smithson. misc. (collections) 137, 287–306 (1959).
—: The predatory and display strikes of the praying mantis. Med. biol. Ill. 10, 172–178 (1950).
Zapata, S.: Biologia de Coptopteryx gayi (Blanchard) (Mantodea). Publ. Cent. Estud. Entomol. 6, 45–57 (1964).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was partially assisted by a grant from the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (Argentina). Figures have been drawn by Mr. J. Machin.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maldonado, H., Levin, L. & Pita, J.C.B. Hit distance and the predatory strike of the praying mantis. Z. vergl. Physiol. 56, 237–257 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333669
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333669