Skip to main content
Log in

Epidermal cell proliferation following an active arthus reaction in the guinea pig

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Active Arthus reactions were provoked by injections of 100μg horseradish peroxidase (HRP), 10μg HRP and 100μg bovine serum albumin (BSA) into the skin of sensitized guinea pigs. Labeling indices (LI) of epidermal basal cells were measured 1, 4, 8, 24, 48 and 72 h later by the in vivo 3H-thymidine labeling technique, and compared with those obtained with injections of antigens into the skin of non-sensitized guinea pigs. From 1–8 h after the induction of an active Arthus reaction, the LI of epidermal basal cells of the skin injected with 100μg HRP decreased to a remarkably low value. On the other hand, those obtained with the reaction against 10μg HRP were significantly high. At 24h after the reaction, LI were as high as those obtained in non-sensitized guinea pigs with control intradermal injections, though the former persisted high until 48h after the injection. In addition, decreased LI of the epidermal basal cells were observed in the skin 4h after intradermal injections of immune complexes.

It was suggested that DNA synthetic activity of the epidermis increases in a mild active Arthus reaction, while the activity may be suppressed in a severe active Arthus reaction up to 8h after provocation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cochrane CG, Weigle WO (1958) The cutaneous reaction to soluble antigen-antibody complex. J Exp Med 108:591–604

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cochrane CG, Aikin BS (1966) Polymorphonuclear leukocytes in immunologic reactions: The destruction of vascular basement membrane in vivo and in vitro. J Exp Med 124:733–752

    Google Scholar 

  3. Henson PM (1971) Inferaction of cells with immune complexes: Adherence, release of constituents, and tissue injury. J Exp Med 134:114–135

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ueki H, Masuda T (1982) Immune complex and cutaneous diseases. J Dermatol 9:255–264

    Google Scholar 

  5. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods, 6th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  6. Igarashi Y (1967) Autoradiographic studies on the proliferation of the skin using 3H-thymidine compound. 2. Studies on animal experiment. Jpn J Dermatol 77:229–238

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alov IA (1963) Daily rhythm of mitosis and relationship between cell work and cell division. Fed Proc 22 [Trans Suppl]:357–362

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bullough WS (1948) The effects of experimentally induced rest and exercise on the epidermal mitotic activity of the adult male mouse. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 135:233–242

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bullough WS (1948) Mitotic activity in the male mouse, Mus musculus L. The diurnal cycles and their relation of walking and sleeping. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 135:212–233

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scheving LE, Pauly JE (1960) Daily mitotic fluctuations in the epidermis of rat and their relation to variations in spontaneous activity and rectal temperature. Acta Anat (Basel) 43:337–345

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kawamura Y, Sonobe K, Shimizu M, Hamaguchi T (1974) Experimental contact dermatitis in mice. J Dermatol 1:83–88

    Google Scholar 

  12. Middleton MC, Pratt I (1978) Changes in incorporation of [3H]-thimidine into DNA of rat skin following cutaneous application of dibutyltin, tributyltin and 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene and the relationship of these changes to a morphological assessment of the cellular damage. J Invest Dermatol 71:305–310

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pullmann H, Galosi A, Jakobeit C, Steigleder GK (1980) Effect of selective ultraviolet phototherapy (SUP) and local PUVA treatment on DNA synthesis in guinea pig skin. Arch Dermatol Res 267:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  14. Storey WF, Leblond CP (1951) Measurement of the rate of proliferation of epidermis and associated structure. Ann NY Acad Sci 53:537–545

    Google Scholar 

  15. Green HN, Bullough WS (1950) Mitotic activity in the shock state. Br J Exp Pathol 31:175–182

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fukuyama K, Bernstein IA, Curtis AC (1959) Effect of betaradiation on mitotic activity in skin of young rat. J Invest Dermatol 32:39–42

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bullough WS, Laurence EB (1968) The role of the glucocorticoid homones in the control of epidermal mitosis. Cell Tissue Kinet 1:5–10

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fisher LB, Maibach H (1971) The effect of corticosteroids on human epidermal mitotic activity. Arch Dermatol 103:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hennings M, Elgio K (1971) Hydrocortisone: Inhibition of DNA synthesis and mitotic rate after local application to mouse epidermis. Virch Arch Abt B (Zellpathol) 8:42–49

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by Kawasaki Medical Grant 1981 No. 56-402 and 1982 No. 57-303 for project research

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hatamochi, A., Ueki, H. Epidermal cell proliferation following an active arthus reaction in the guinea pig. Arch Dermatol Res 275, 296–300 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417200

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417200

Key words

Navigation