Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of recovery from anaerobic work

  • Published:
Arbeitsphysiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Recovery processes have been studied in severe work of uniform intensity continuing from a minimum of 5 seconds to a maximum of 106 seconds. The work was largely anaerobic, requiring the accumulation of an oxygen debt, the magnitude of which was approximately a linear function of time.

The rate of removal of lactic acid is a logarithmic function of time; the rate varies somewhat from time to time and from one person to another. In the type of activity studied the lactic acid accumulated is proportional to the duration of work. The total oxygen debt as well as the lactacid debt being proportional to duration of work, it follows that the so-called alactacid debt is also proportional to the duration of work. In other words, the lactacid debt and the alactacid debt in such activity are contracted concurrently.

The oxygen intake in recovery may be analyzed into a rapid process nearly complete in 5 minutes which pays the alactacid debt, a process about 1/20th as rapid which pays the lactacid debt, and finally an increase in resting metabolism which decreases in a linear fashion until the pre-exercise level is reached. The excess R. Q for the entire process of work and recovery probably lies within the range 0,9 to 1,0.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  1. Margaria, R., H. T. Edwards andD. B. Dill: Amer. J. Physiol.106, 689 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benedict, F. G. andE. F. Cathcart: Carnegie Inst. Washington, Publication 1913, Nr 187.

  3. Lundsgaard, E.: Biochem. Z.217, 162 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, A. J., M. C. Eggleton andP. Eggleton: J. of Physiol.25, 332 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Margaria, R. andH. T. Edwards: Amer. J. Physiol.107, 681 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Margaria, R. andH. T. Edwards: Amer. J. Physiol.108, 341 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Benedict, F. G.: J. of biol. Chem.20, 263 (1915).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Simonson andSirkina: Arb.physiol.8, 560 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herxheimer, H.: Arb.physiol.8, 801 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hill, A. V., C. N. H. Long andH. Lupton: P. I-III, Proc. roy. Soc. Lond. s. B,96; P. IV–VI, s. B.97; P. VII bis VIII, s. B.97 (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Solandt, O. M. andJ. H. Rideout: Proc. roy. Soc. Lond.133, 327 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sargent, R. M.: Proc. roy. Soc. Lond. s. B.,100, 440 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Best, Furusawa andRideout: Proc. roy. Soc. Lond. s. B.,104, 119 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dill, D. B., H. T. Edwards andR. H. de Meio: Amer. J. Physiol.111, 9 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Christensen, E. H., A. Krogh andJ. Lindhard: Quart. Bull. Health Org.3, Nr 15.

  16. Irving, L. H., C. Foster andJ. K. W. Ferguson: J. of biol. Chem.95, 95 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gemmill, C., W. Booth, J. Detrick andH. Schiebel: Amer. J. Physiol.96, 265 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cathcart, E. P. andJ. Markowitz: J. of Physiol.63, 309 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Krogh, A. andJ. Lindhard: Biochem. J.14, 290 (1920).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rapport, David: Physiol. Rev.10, 349 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dill, D.B., Edwards, H.T., Newman, E.V. et al. Analysis of recovery from anaerobic work. Arbeitsphysiologie 9, 299–307 (1936). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02011084

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02011084

Keywords

Navigation