Summary
In a recent publication in this journal (Berking 1983) it was claimed (1) that the head inhibitor we isolated from hydra is a Dowex artefact, (2) that a separate foot inhibitor does not exist in hydra and (3) that the only inhibitor that has so far been isolated from hydra is one which inhibits head and foot regeneration equally well. These statements are incorrect and require a response. In the following, I would like to summarise our evidence that the inhibitors isolated from hydra, including Berking's inhibitor, have different specificities for head and foot regeneration. In addition, I would like to show that none of our substances are Dowex artefacts.
References
Berking S (1974) Nachweis eines morphogenetish aktiven Hemmstoffs Doktorarbeit, Universität Tübingen
Berking S (1977) Bud formation in hydra: Inhibition by an endogenous morphogen. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 181:215–225
Berking S (1979a) Analysis of head and foot formation in hydra by means of an endogeneous inhibitor. Willhelm Roux's Arch 186:189–210
Berking S (1979b) Control of nerve cell formation from multipotent stem cells in hydra. J Cell Sci 40:193–205
Berking S (1983) The fractionation of a hydra-derived inhibitor into head and foot inhibitor may be an artefact. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 192:327–332
Berking S, Gierer A (1977) Analysis of early stages of budding in hydra by means of an endogenous inhibitor. Roux's Arch 181:215–225
Kemmner W, Schaller HC (1984) Action of head activator and head inhibitor during head regeneration in hydra. Differention [in press]
MacWilliams HK (1983a) Hydra transplantation phenomena and the mechanism of head regeneration. I. Properties of the host. Dev Biol 96:217–238
MacWilliams HK (1983b) Hydra transplantation phenomena and the mechanism of head regeneration. II. Properties of the donor. Dev Biol 96: 239–257
MacWilliams HK, Kafatos FC (1968) Inhibition by the basal disc differentiation in hydra. Science 159:1246–1247
MacWilliams HK, Kafatos FC (1974) The basal inhibition in hydra may be mediated by a diffusing substance. Am Zool 14:633–645
Schaller HC (1976) Head regeneration in hydra in initiated by the release of head activator and inhibitor. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 180:287–295
Schaller HC, Schmidt T, Flick K, Grimmelikhujjzen CJP (1977) Analysis of morphogenetic mutants of hydra: I. The Aberrant. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 183:193–206
Schaller HC, Schmidt T, Grimmelikhuijzen CJP (1979) Separation and specificity of action of four morphogens from hydra. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 186:139–149
Schmidt T, Schaller HC (1976) Evidence for a foot-inhibiting substance in hydra. Cell Diff 5:151–159
Schmidt T, Schaller HC (1980) Properties of the foot inhibitor from hydra. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 188:133–139
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chica Schaller, H. The head and the foot inhibitor from hydra are not dowex artefacts. Wilhelm Roux' Archiv 193, 117–118 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848640
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848640