Skip to main content
Log in

The head and the foot inhibitor from hydra are not dowex artefacts

  • Rapid Communications
  • Published:
Wilhelm Roux's archives of developmental biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a recent publication in this journal (Berking 1983) it was claimed (1) that the head inhibitor we isolated from hydra is a Dowex artefact, (2) that a separate foot inhibitor does not exist in hydra and (3) that the only inhibitor that has so far been isolated from hydra is one which inhibits head and foot regeneration equally well. These statements are incorrect and require a response. In the following, I would like to summarise our evidence that the inhibitors isolated from hydra, including Berking's inhibitor, have different specificities for head and foot regeneration. In addition, I would like to show that none of our substances are Dowex artefacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Berking S (1974) Nachweis eines morphogenetish aktiven Hemmstoffs Doktorarbeit, Universität Tübingen

  • Berking S (1977) Bud formation in hydra: Inhibition by an endogenous morphogen. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 181:215–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Berking S (1979a) Analysis of head and foot formation in hydra by means of an endogeneous inhibitor. Willhelm Roux's Arch 186:189–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Berking S (1979b) Control of nerve cell formation from multipotent stem cells in hydra. J Cell Sci 40:193–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Berking S (1983) The fractionation of a hydra-derived inhibitor into head and foot inhibitor may be an artefact. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 192:327–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Berking S, Gierer A (1977) Analysis of early stages of budding in hydra by means of an endogenous inhibitor. Roux's Arch 181:215–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmner W, Schaller HC (1984) Action of head activator and head inhibitor during head regeneration in hydra. Differention [in press]

  • MacWilliams HK (1983a) Hydra transplantation phenomena and the mechanism of head regeneration. I. Properties of the host. Dev Biol 96:217–238

    Google Scholar 

  • MacWilliams HK (1983b) Hydra transplantation phenomena and the mechanism of head regeneration. II. Properties of the donor. Dev Biol 96: 239–257

    Google Scholar 

  • MacWilliams HK, Kafatos FC (1968) Inhibition by the basal disc differentiation in hydra. Science 159:1246–1247

    Google Scholar 

  • MacWilliams HK, Kafatos FC (1974) The basal inhibition in hydra may be mediated by a diffusing substance. Am Zool 14:633–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller HC (1976) Head regeneration in hydra in initiated by the release of head activator and inhibitor. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 180:287–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller HC, Schmidt T, Flick K, Grimmelikhujjzen CJP (1977) Analysis of morphogenetic mutants of hydra: I. The Aberrant. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 183:193–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller HC, Schmidt T, Grimmelikhuijzen CJP (1979) Separation and specificity of action of four morphogens from hydra. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 186:139–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt T, Schaller HC (1976) Evidence for a foot-inhibiting substance in hydra. Cell Diff 5:151–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt T, Schaller HC (1980) Properties of the foot inhibitor from hydra. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 188:133–139

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chica Schaller, H. The head and the foot inhibitor from hydra are not dowex artefacts. Wilhelm Roux' Archiv 193, 117–118 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848640

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848640

Key words

Navigation