Summary
Mesoderm formation is a result of cell-cell interactions between the vegetal and animal hemisphere and is thought to be mediated by inducing peptide growth factors including members of the FGF and TGFβ superfamilies. Our immunochemical study analyses the distribution of FGF receptors coded by the human flg gene during embryogenesis of Xenopus laevis. Immunostaining was detected in the dorsal and ventral ectoderm and also in the marginal zone of early cleavage, blastula and gastrula stages. Signals were very strong in the mid and late blastula (stage 8 and 9) and declined slightly in the early gastrula (stage 10). A dramatic decrease was observed up to the late gastrula (stage 11+). In stage 13 embryos, immunostaining was only found in cells around the blastopore. Isolated ectoderm cultured in vitro showed a similar temporal expression and decrease of the signal as the normal embryos. These results indicate that receptor expression is independent of the interaction of the animal cells with the vegetal part of the embryo. Of interest is the fact that the signal cannot only be found at or near the cell surface but also within the cell. This suggests the presence of an intracellular isoform of the receptor resulting from the endogenous expression of splice variants and the internalization of transmembrane receptor. Taken together our results suggest that the loss of competence (for bFGF around stage 10) is not directly correlated with the presence of receptors. The possible roles of heparan sulphate glucosaminoglycans (low affinity receptors) and control mechanisms in the intracellular signalling pathway downstream of the receptor level should be taken into consideration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amaya E, Musci TJ, Kirschner MW (1991) Expression of a dominant negative mutant of the FGF receptor disrupts mesoderm formation in Xenopus embryos. Cell 66:257–260
Asashima M (1975) Inducing effects of presumptive endoderm of successive stages in Triturus alpestris. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 177:301–308
Caughlin SR, Barr PI, Cousens LS, Fretto LI, Williams LT (1988) Acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors stimulated tyrosine kinase activity in vivo.J Biol Chem 263:988–993
Dale L, Smith JC, Slack JMW (1985) Mesoderm induction in Xenopus laevis: a quantitative study using a cell lineage label and tissue-specific antibodies. J Embryol Exp Morphol 89:298–312
Friesel R, Dawid IB (1991) cDNA cloning and developmental expression of fibroblast growth factor receptors from Xenopus laevis. Mol Cell Biol 11:2482–2488
Gillespie LL, Paterno GD, Slack JMW (1989) Analysis of competence: receptors for fibroblast growth factor in early Xenopus embryos. Development 106:203–208
Godsave SF, Isaacs HV, Slack JMW (1988) Mesoderm inducing factors: a small class of molecules. Development 102:555–566
Grunz H (1968) Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Kompetenzverhältnisse früher Entwicklungsstadien des Amphibien-Ektoderms. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 160:344–374
Grunz H (1970) Abhängigkeit der Kompetenz des Amphibien-Ektoderms von der Proteinsynthese. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 165:91–102
Grunz H (1983) Change in the differentiation pattern of Xenopus laevis ectoderm by variation of the incubation time and concentration of vegetalizing factor. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 192:130–137
Grunz H, Tacke L (1986) The inducing capacity of the presumptive endoderm of Xenopus laevis studied by transfilter experiments. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 195:467–473
Grunz H, Tacke L (1989) Neural differentiation of Xenopus laevis ectoderm takes place after disaggregation and delayed reaggregation without inducer. Cell Differ Dev 28:211–218
Grunz H, Tacke L (1990) Extracellular matrix components prevent neural differentiation of disaggregated Xenopus ectoderm cells. Cell Differ Dev 32:117–124
Grunz H, Multier AM, Herbst R, Arkenberg G (1975) The differentiation of isolated amphibian ectoderm with or without treatment of an inductor. A scanning electron microscope study. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 178:277–284
Grunz H, McKeehan WL, Knöchel W, Born J, Tiedemann H, Tiedemann H (1988) Induction of mesodermal tissues by acidic and basic heparin binding growth factors. Cell Differ 22:183–190
Hou I, Kan M, McKeehan K, McBride G, Adams P, McKeehan WL (1991) Fibroblast growth factor receptors from liver vary in three structural domains. Science 251:665–668
Jones EA, Woodland HL (1987) The development of animal cap cells in Xenopus: a measure of the start of animal cap competence to form mesoderm. Development 101:557–563
Kan M, Yan G, Xu J, Nakahara M, Hou J (1992) Receptor phenotype underlies differential response of hepatocytes and non-parenchymal cells to heparin-binding fibroblast growth factor type 1 (aFGF) and type 2 (bFGF) (In Vitro, in press)
Kimelman D, Kirschner M (1987) Synergistic induction of mesoderm by FGF and TGFβ and the identification of a mRNA coding for TGF in the early Xenopus embryo. Cell 51:369–377
Kimelman D, Abraham JA, Haaparanta T, Palisi TM, Kirschner M (1988) The presence of FGF in the frog egg: its role as a natural mesoderm inducer. Science 242:1053–1056
Kirschner MW, Hara K (1980) A new method for local vital staining of amphibian embryos using ficoll and “crystals” of Nile Red. Mikroskopie (Wien) 36:12–15
Klagsbrun M, Baird A (1991) A dual receptor system is required for basic fibroblast growth factor activity. Cell 67:229–231
Knöchel W, Born J, Hoppe P, Loppnow-Blinde B, Tiedemann H, Tiedemann H, McKeehan WL, Grunz H (1987) Mesoderm inducing factors: Their possible relationship to heparin binding growth factors and transforming growth factor-β. Naturwissenschaften 74:604–606
Musci TT, Amaya E, Kirschner MW (1990) Regulation of the fibroblast growth factor receptor in early Xenopus embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:8365–8369
Nieuwkoop PD (1969) The formation of the mesoderm in urodelean amphibians: I. Induction by the endoderm. Roux's Arch Entw Mech Org 162:341–373
Nieuwkoop PD (1973) The “organization centre” of the amphibian embryo, its origin, spatial organization and morphogenetic action. Adv Morphol 10:1–39
Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J (1967) Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). North Holland, Amsterdam
Orr-Urtreger A, Givol D, Yayon A, Yarden Y. Lonai P (1991) Developmental expression of two murine fibroblast growth factor receptors, flg and bek. Development 113:1419–1434
Rosa F, Roberts AB, Danielpour D, Dart LL, Sporn MB, Dawid IB (1988) Mesoderm induction in amphibians: the role of TGFβ-2-like factors. Science 329:783–785
Shi E, Kan M, Jianming X, McKeehan WL (1991) 16-kilodalton heparin binding (fibroblast) growth factor type one appears in a stable 40-kilodalton complex after receptor-dependent internalization. J Biol Chem 266:5774–5779
Shiurba RA, Jing N, Sakakura T, Godsave SF (1991) Nuclear translocation of fibroblast growth factor during Xenopus mesoderm induction. Development 105:487–493
Slack JMW, Isaacs H (1989) Presence of basic fibroblast growth factor in the early Xenopus embryo. Development 105:147–154
Slack JMW, Darlington BG, Heath IK, Godsave SF (1987) Mesoderm induction in early Xenopus embryos by heparin-binding growth factors. Nature 326:197–200
Slack JMW, Isaacs HV, Darlington BG (1988) Inductive effects of fibroblast growth factor and lithium ion on Xenopus blastula ectoderm. Development 103:581–590
Xu J, Nakahara M, Crabb JW, Shi E, Matuo Y, Fraser M, Kan M, Hou J, McKeehan WL (1992) Expression and immunochemical analysis of bacterial and baculoviral-insect cell recombinant, rat prostate and human liver tumor cell heparin-binding fibroblast growth factor receptor (flg) isoforms. J Biol Chem (in press)
Yan G, Wang F, Fukabori Y, Sussman D, Hou J, McKeehan WL (1992) Expression and transforming activity of a variant of the heparin-binding fibroblast growth factor receptor (flg) gene resulting from splicing of the alpha exon at an alternate 3′-acceptor site. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 183:423–430
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ding, Xy., McKeehan, W.L., Xu, J. et al. Spatial and temporal localization of FGF receptors in Xenopus laevis . Roux's Arch Dev Biol 201, 334–339 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365120
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365120