Summary
The structural changes of the cecal wall in germfree rats were observed at regular intervals after the inoculation of fecal microflora from conventional rats. Quantitative light microscopy showed that most of the elements in the cecal wall increased at 12 or 24 h and reached peak values at 4 days after inoculation. On the 7th day, they decreased approximately to the values for conventional rats. The crypts were bent or widely open till 24 h but were not after the 4th day. Hyperplasia of the crypt epithelial cells including mucous-type cells was observed following microbial inoculation. Electron microscopy revealed that most of the epithelial cells lining the mucosa were typical columnar cells. Desquamation of the epithelial cells and contraction of the muscle fibers were often seen on 4th day. The mucous-type cells were divided into two types, goblet and non-goblet mucous-type cells. Reduction of cecal volume after microbial inoculation may be mainly caused by muscle contraction in the early period and hyperplasia and desquamation of the epithelial cells may suggest their role as the first and non-specific defense line prior to operation of the specific immune system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altmann GG (1983) Morphological observations on mucus-secreting nongoblet cells in the deep crypts of the rat ascending colon. Am J Anat 167:95–117
Asano T (1969a) Anion concentration in cecal content of germ-free and conventional mice. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 131:1201–1205
Asano T (1969b) Modification of cecal size in germfree rats by long-term feeding of anion exchange resin. Am J Physiol 217:911–918
Back N, Steger R, Mirand EA (1969) Kinin-forming activity in cecal contents of germ-free and conventional mice. In: Mirand EA, Back N (eds) Germfree biology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 173–177
Björnhag G (1972) Separation and delay of contents in the rabbit colon. Swed J Agric Res 2:125–136
Brandtzaeg P, Valnes K, Scott H, Rognum TO, Bjerke K, Baklien K (1985) The human gastrointestinal secretory immune system in health and disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 20 [Suppl] 114:17–38
Chang WW, Leblond CP (1971) Renewal of the epithelium in the descending colon of the mouse. I. response of three cell populations: vacuolated-columnar, muscus and argentaffin. Am J Anat 131:73–100
Coates ME, Fuller R (1977) The gnotobiotic animal in the study of gut microbiology. In: Clarke RTJ, Bauchop T (eds) Microbial ecology of the gut. Academic Press, New York, pp 311–346
Crabbé PA, Nash DR, Bazin H, Eyssen H, Heremans JF (1970) Immunohistochemical observations on lymphoid tissues from conventional and germ-free mice. Lab Invest 22:448–457
Donowitz M, Binder HJ (1979) Mechanism of fluid and electrolyte secretion in the germ-free rat cecum. Dig Dis Sci 24:551–559
Dupont J-R, Jervis HR, Sprinz H (1965) Auerbach's plexus of the rat cecum in relation to the germfree state. J Comp Neurol 125:11–18
Gordon HA (1960) The germ-free animal. Am J Dig Dis 5:841–867
Gordon HA (1967) A substance acting on smooth muscle in intestinal contents of germfree animals. Ann NY Acad Sci 147:83–106
Gordon HA, Pesti L (1971) The gnotobiotic animal as a tool in the study of host microbial relationships. Bacteriol Rev 35:390–429
Gustafsson BE, Carlstedt-Duke B (1984) Intestinal water-soluble mucins in germfree, exgermfree and conventional animals. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand Sect B 92:247–252
Gustafsson BE, Maunsbach AB (1971) Ultrastructure of the enlarged cecum in germfree rats. Z Zellforsch 120:555–578
Gustafsson BE, Midtvedt T, Strandberg K (1970) Effects of microbial contamination on the cecum enlargement of germfree rats. Scand J Gastroenterol 5:309–314
Heneghan JB (1965) Imbalance of the normal microbial flora. Am J Dig Dis 10:864–869
Ishikawa K, Satoh Y, Tanaka H, Ono K (1986) Influence of conventionalization on small-intestinal mucosa of germ-free Wistar rats: quantitative light microscopic observations. Acta Anat (Basel) 127:296–302
Japan Experimental Animal Research Association (1972) Recommended requirement for sterility test of germ-free animals, provisional (Japanese). Exp Anim 21:35–38
McNabb PC, Tomasi TB (1981) Host defense mechanisms at mucosal surfaces. Ann Rev Microbiol 35:477–496
Nagura H, Hasegawa H, Yoshimura S, Aihara K, Watanabe K, Sawamura S, Ozawa A (1981) Comparative immunohistochemical studies on conventional and germfree rat intestinal mucosa: with special reference to microbial flora and secretory IgA (sIgA). In: Sasaki S, Ozawa A, Hashimoto K (eds) Recent advances in germfree research. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, pp 511–517
Sato Y, Vollrath L (1986) Quantitative electron microscopic observations on Paneth cells of germfree and ex-germfree Wistar rats. Anat Embryol (Berl) 173:317–322
Satoh Y, Ishikawa K, Ono K, Vollrath L (1986) Quantitative light microscopic observations on Paneth cells of germ-free and exgerm-free Wistar rats. Digestion 34:115–121
Simon GL, Gorbach SL (1984) Intestinal flora in health and disease. Gastroenterology 86:174–193
Snipes RL (1979a) Anatomy of the cecum of the vole, Microtus agrestis. Anat Embryol (Berl) 157:181–203
Snipes RL (1979b) Anatomy of the cecum of the dwarf hamster (Phodopus sungorus). Anat Embryol (Berl) 157:329–346
Snipes RL (1981) Anatomy of the cecum of the laboratory mouse and rat. Anat Embryol (Berl) 162:455–474
Strandberg K, Sedvall G, Midtvedt T, Gustafsson B (1966) Effect of some biologically active amines on the cecum wall of germfree rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 121:699–702
Wostmann BS (1968) Defence mechanisms in germ-free animals Part I. Humoral defence mechanism. In: Cates ME (ed) the germfree animal in research. Academic Press, London New York, pp 197–209
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ishikawa, K., Satoh, Y., Oomori, Y. et al. Influence of conventionalization on cecal wall structure of germ-free Wistar rats: quantitative light and qualitative electron microscopic observations. Anat Embryol 180, 191–198 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309771
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309771