Abstract
Low risk criteria have been defined to identify febrile infants unlikely to have serious bacterial infection (SBI). Using these criteria approximately 40% of all febrile infants can be defined as being at low risk. Of the remaining infants (60%) only 10%–20% have an SBI. No adequate criteria exist to identify these infants. All infants aged 2 weeks-1 year, presenting during a 1-year-period with rectal temperature ≥38.0°C to the Sophia Children's Hospital were included in a prospective study. Infants with a history of prematurity, perinatal complications, known underlying disease, antibiotic treatment or vaccination during the preceding 48 h were excluded. Clinical and laboratory variables at presentation were evaluated by a multivariate logistic regression model using SBI as the dependent variable. By using likelihood ratios a predictive model was derived, providing a post test probability of SBI for every individual patient. Of the 138 infants included in the study, 33 (24%) had SBI. Logistic regression analysis defined C-reactive protein (CRP), duration of fever, a standardized clinical impression score, a history of diarrhoea and focal signs of infection as independent predictors of SBI.
Conclusion
CRP, duration of fever, the “standardized clinical impression score”, a history of diarrhoea and focal signs of infection were the independent, most powerful predictors of SBI in febrile infants, identified by logistic regression analysis. Although the predictive model is not validated for direct clinical use, it illustrates the clinical potential of the used technique. This technique offers the advantage to assess the probability of SBI in every individual infant. This probability will form the best basis for well-founded decisions in the management of the individual febrile infant.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CRP :
-
C-reactive protein
- SBI :
-
serious bacterial infection
- UTI :
-
urinary tract infection
References
Avner JR, Crain EF, Baker MD (1993) Failure to validate the Rochester criteria for evaluation of febrile infants. Am J Dis Child 147: 441
Baker MD, Avner JR, Bell LM (1988) Failure of infant observation scales to identify serious illness in febrile 1- to 2-month- old infants. Am J Dis Child 142: 390
Baker MD, Bell LM, Avner JR (1993) Outpatient management without antibiotics of fever in selected infants. N Engl J Med 329: 1437–1441
Baraff LJ, Bass JW, Fleischer GR, Klein JO, McCracken GH, POwell KR, Schriger DL (1993) Practice guideline for the management of infants and children 0 to 36 month of age with fever without a source. Pediatrics 92: 1–12
Baskin MN, O'Rourke EJ, Fleisher GR (1992) Outpatient treatment of febrile infants 28 to 89 days of age with intramuscular administration of ceftriaxone. J Pediatr 120: 22–27
Bonadio WA (1990) Evaluation and management of serious bacterial infections in the febrile young infant. Pediatr Infect Dis J 9: 905–912
Chernow B, Zaloga GP, Soldano S, et al (1984) Measurement of urinary leucocyte esterase activity: a screening test for urinary tract, infections. Ann Emerg Med 13: 150–154
Dagan R, Powell KR, Hall CB, Menegus MA (1985) Identification of infants unlikely to have serious bacterial infection although hospitalized for suspected sepsis. J Pediatr 107: 855–860
Dagan R, Sofer S, Phillip M, Shachak E (1988) Ambulatory care of febrile infants younger than 2 months of age classified as being at low risk for having serious bacterial infections. J Pediatr 112: 355–360
De Angelis C, Joffe A, Wilson M, et al (1983) Iatrogenic risks and financial costs of hospitalizing febrile infants. Am J Dis Child 137: 1146–1149
Gardner MJ, Altman DG (1989) Statistics with confidence. BMJ 50-63
Hoberman A, Chao HP, Keller DM, Hickey R, Davis HW, Ellis D (1993) Prevalence of urinary tract infection in febrile infants. J Pediatr 123: 17–23
Hoberman A, Wald ER, Reynolds EA, Penchanski L, Charron M (1994) Pyuria and bacteriuria in urine specimens obtained by catheter from young children with fever. J Pediatr 124: 513–519
Jaskiewicz JA, McCarthy CA, Richardson AC, White KC, Fisher, DJ, Dagan R, Powell KR (1994) Febrile infants at low risk for serious bacterial infection — an appraisal of the Rochester criteria and implications for management. Pediatrics 94: 390–396
Klein JO, Schlesinger PC, Karasic RB (1984) Management of the febrile infant three months of age or younger. Pediatr Inf Dis J 3: 75–79
Lieu TA, Schwartz JS, Jaffe DM, Fleisher GR (1991) Strategies for diagnosis and treatment of children at risk for occult bacteremia: clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. J Pediatr 118: 21–29
Linnet K (1988) A review on the. methodology for assessing diagnostic tests. Clin Chem 34: 1379–1386
Lohr JA, Portilla MG, Geuder TG, Dunn ML, Dudley SM (1993) Making a presumptive diagnosis of urinary tract infection by using a urinalysis performed in an on-site laboratory. J Pediatr 122: 22–25
McCarthy PL (1994) The febrile infant. Pediatrics 94: 397–398
McCarthy PL, Jekel JF, Stashwick CA, et al (1981) Further definition of history and observation variables in assessing febrile children. Pediatrics 67: 687–693
McCarthy PL, Sharpe MR, Spiesel SZ et al (1982) Observation scales to identify serious illness in febrile children. Pediatrics 70: 802–809
Pantell RH, Berwick DM (1990) Cost-effectiveness analysis in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 85: 361–363
Powell KR (1990) Evaluation and management of febrile infants younger than 60 days of age. Pediatr Infect Dis J 9: 153–157
Sawyer P, Stone LL (1984) Evaluation of a leucocyte dip-stick test used for screening urine cultures. J Clin Microbiol 20: 820–821
Shapiro ED (1986) Bacteremia in the febrile child. Year Book Medical Publishers Inc.
Sox HC, Blatt MA, Higgins MC, Marton KI (1988) Medical decision Making. Butterworths, Boston
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berger, R.M.F., Berger, M.Y., van Steensel-Moll, H.A. et al. A predictive model to estimate the risk of serious bacterial infections in febrile infants. Eur J Pediatr 155, 468–473 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01955183
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01955183