Skip to main content
Log in

Seed selection by dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis): optimal foraging with nutrient constraints?

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Observations of the foraging behavior of six captive dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis) are used to test the assumptions and predictions of optimal diet choice models (Pyke et al. 1977) that include nutrients (Pulliam 1975). The birds sequentially encountered single seeds of niger thistle (Guizotia abyssinica) and of canary grass (Phalaris canariensis) on an artificial substrate in the laboratory. Niger thistle seeds were preferred by all birds although their profitability in terms of energy intake (J/s) was less than the profitability of canary grass seeds. Of four nutritional components used to calculate profitabilities (mg/s) lipid content was the only characteristic that could explain the junco's seed preference. As predicted by optimal diet theory the probability of consuming niger thistle seeds was independent of seed abundance. However, the consumption of 71–84% rather than 100% of the seeds encountered is not consistent with the prediction of all-or-nothing selection. Canary grass seeds were consumed at a constant rate (no./s) independent of the number of seeds encountered. This consumption pattern invalidates a model that assumes strict maximization. However, it is consistent with the assumption that canary grass seeds contain a nutrient which is required in minimum amounts to meet physiological demands (Pulliam 1975). These experiments emphasize the importance of incorporating nutrients into optimal foraging models and of combining seed preference studies with studies of the metabolic requirements of consumers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnard CJ, Stephens H (1981) Prey size selection by lapwings in lapwing/gull associations. Behaviour 77:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Blem CR (1976) Patterns of lipid storage and utilization in birds. Am Zool 16:671–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss CI (1970) Statistics in Biology, vol 2. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York, pp 454–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey C, Dawson WR, Maxwell LC, Faulkner JA (1978) Seasonal acclimatization to temperature in Cardueline finches II. Changes in body composition and mass in relation to season and acute cold stress. J Comp Physiol 125:101–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging: attack strategy of a mantid. Am Nat 110:141–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley JB, Blem CR (1978) Seed selection by japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Am Midl Nat 100:135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1977a) Prey selection and social behaviour in wagtails (Aves: Motacillidae). J Anim Ecol 46:37–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1977b) Prey selection and the search strategy of the spotted flycatcher (Muscicapa striata): a field study on optimal foraging. Anim Behav 25:1016–1033

    Google Scholar 

  • Elner RW, Hughes RN (1978) Energy maximization in the diet of the shore crab, Carcinus maenas. J Anim Ecol 47:103–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss-Custard JD (1977a) Optimal foraging and the size selection of worms by redshank (Tringa totanus) in the field. Anim Behav 25:10–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss-Custard JD (1977b) Predator responses and prey mortality in the redshank (Tringa totanus) and a preferred prey, Corophium volutator. J Anim Ecol 46:21–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Green R (1978) Factors affecting the diet of farmland skylarks (Alauda arvensis). J Anim Ecol 47:913–928

    Google Scholar 

  • Kear J (1962) Food selection in finches with special references to interspecific differences. Proc Zool Soc Lond 138:163–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, McCleery RH (1984) Optimization in behavioral ecology. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Erichsen JT, Webber MI, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal prey selection in the great tit (Parus major). Anim Behav 25:30–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Stephens DW, Sutherland WJ (1983) Perspecitives in optimal foraging. In: Perspectives in ornithology. Am Ornith Union

  • MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On the optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland DJ, Houston AI (1981) Quantitative ethology: The state space approach. Pitmann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittlebach GG (1981) Foraging efficiency and body size: a study of optimal diet and habitat use by bluegills. Ecology 62:1370–1386

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP, Major JC (1956) The effect of diet on photoperiod induced lipid deposition in the white-throated sparrow. Condor 58:222–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1974) On the theory of optimal diets. Am Nat 108:59–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1975) Diet optimization with nutrient constraints. Am Nat 109:765–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1980) Do chipping sparrows forage optimally? Ardea 68:75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport DJ (1971) An optimization model of food selection. Am Nat 105:575–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport DJ (1980) Optimal foraging for complementary resources. Am Nat 116:324–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechten C, Avery M, Stevens A (1983) Optimal prey selection: why do great tits show partial preferences? Anim Behav 31:576–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1974) The compression hypothesis and temporal resource partitioning. Proc Nat Acad Sci 71:4169–4172

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. WH Freeman and Co, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson MF (1971) Seed selection in some North American finches. Condor 73:415–429

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, D.B., Tomback, D.F., Cunningham, M.A. et al. Seed selection by dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis): optimal foraging with nutrient constraints?. Oecologia 74, 106–111 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377353

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377353

Key words

Navigation