Summary
Leaves from two species, Euonymus kiautschovicus and Arctostaphylos uva-ursi, with a variety of different orientations and exposures, were examined in the field with regard to the xanthophyll cycle (the interconversion of three carotenoids in the chloroplast thylakoid membranes). East-, south-, and west-facing leaves of E. kiautschovicus were sampled throughout the day and all exhibited a pronounced and progressive conversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin, followed by a reconversion of zeaxanthin to violaxanthin later in the day. Maximal levels of zeaxanthin and minimal levels of violaxanthin were observed at the time when each leaf (orientation) received the maximum incident light, which was in the morning in east-facing, midday in southfacing, and in the afternoon in west-facing leaves. A very slight degree of hysteresis in the removal of zeaxanthin compared to its formation with regard to incident light was observed. Leaves with a broader range of orientations were sampled from A. uva-ursi prior to sunrise and at midday. All of the examined pigments (carotenoids and chlorophylls) increased somewhat per unit leaf area with increasing total daily photon receipt. The sum of the carotenoids involved in the xanthophyll cycle, violaxanthin + antheraxanthin + zeaxanthin, increased more strongly with increasing growth light than any other pigment. In addition, the amounts of zeaxanthin present at midday also increased markedly with increasing total daily photon receipt. The percentage of the xanthophyll cycle that was converted to zeaxanthin (and antheraxanthin) at peak irradiance was very large (approximately 80%) in the leaves of both E. kiautschovicus and A. uva-ursi. The daily changes in the components of the xanthophyll cycle that paralleled the daily changes in incident light in the leaves of E. kiautschovicus, and the increasing levels of the xanthophyll cycle components with total daily photon receipt in the leaves of A. uva-ursi, are both consistent with the involvement of zeaxanthin (i.e. the xanthophyll cycle) in the photoprotection of the photosynthetic apparatus against damage due to excessive light.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A:
-
antheraxanthin
- EPS:
-
epoxidation state of the xanthophyll cycle=(V+0.5A)/(V+A+Z)
- PFD:
-
photon flux density (400–700 nm)
- PFDi :
-
photon flux density incident upon the upper leaf surface
- Tair :
-
air temperature
- TL :
-
leaf temperature
- V:
-
violaxanthin
- Z:
-
zeaxanthin
References
Adams WW III (1988) Photosynthetic acclimation and photoinhibition of terrestrial and epiphytic CAM tissues growing in full sunlight and deep shade. Aust J Plant Physiol 15:123–134
Adams WW III, Demmig-Adams B (1992) Operation of the xanthophyll cycle in higher plants in response to diurnal changes in incident sunlight. Planta 186:390–398
Adams WW III, Smith SD, Osmond CB (1987) Photoinhibition of the CAM succulent Opuntia basilaris growing in Death Valley: evidence from 77K fluorescence and quantum yield. Oecologia 71:221–228
Adams WW III, Terashima I, Brugnoli E, Demmig B (1988) Comparisons of photosynthesis and photoinhibition in the CAM vine Hoya australis and several C3 vines growing on the coast of eastern Australia. Plant Cell Environ 11:173–181
Adams WW III, Díaz M, Winter K (1989) Diurnal changes in photochemical efficiency, the reduction state of Q, radiationless energy dissipation, and nonphotochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching in cacti exposed to natural sunlight in northern Venezuela. Oecologia 80:553–561
Anderson JM (1984) Photoregulation of the composition, function, and structure of thylakoid membranes. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 37:93–136
Boes EC (1980) Fundamentals of solar radiation. In: Kreider, JF, Kreith, F (eds) Solar Energy Handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 2.1–2.78
Björkman O (1981) Responses to different quantum flux densities. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Physiological Plant Ecology I. (Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, NS, vol 12A). Springer, Berlin, pp 57–107
Campbell GS (1977) An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. Springer, New York
Demmig-Adams B (1990) Carotenoids and photoprotection in plants: A role for the xanthophyll zeaxanthin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1020:1–24
Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW III, Winter K, Meyer A, Schreiber U, Pereira JS, Krüger A, Czygan F-C, Lange OL (1989) Photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, photon yield of O2 evolution, photosynthetic capacity, and carotenoid composition during the “midday depression” of net CO2 uptake in Arbutus unedo growing in Portugal. Planta 177:377–387
Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW III, Green TGA, Czygan F-C, Lange OL (1990) Differences in the susceptibility to light stress in two lichens forming a phycosymbiodeme, one partner possessing and one lacking the xanthophyll cycle. Oecologia 84:451–456
Hager A (1980) The reversible, light-induced conversions of xanthophylls in the chloroplast. In: Czygan F-C (ed) Pigments in Plants. Fischer, Stuttgart, pp 57–79
Röbbelen G (1957) Untersuchungen an strahleninduzierten Blattfarbmutanten von Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Z Indukt Abstammungs-Vererbungsl 88:189–252
Siefermann-Harms D (1977) The xanthophyll cycle in higher plants. In: Tevini M, Lichtenthaler HK (eds) Lipids and lipid polymers in higher plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 218–230
Thayer SS, Björkman O (1990) Leaf xanthophyll content and composition in sun and shade determined by HPLC. Photosynth Res 23:331–343
Yamamoto HY (1979) Biochemistry of the violaxanthin cycle in higher plants. Pure Appl Chem 51:639–648
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adams, W.W., Volk, M., Hoehn, A. et al. Leaf orientation and the response of the xanthophyll cycle to incident light. Oecologia 90, 404–410 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317698
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317698