Skip to main content
Log in

Continent urinary diversion and bladder augmentation in children: the Mainz pouch procedure

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The formation of a bowel reservoir of large capacity at low pressure by using small and large bowel (ileocaecal segment) has proved reliable for achieving continent urinary diversion (n=80), for bladder augmentation (n=42) as well as for total bladder replacement (n=24). Encouraged by the results we obtained in our adult patients, we have used this technique during the last 3.5 years in 29 children. Indications for urinary diversions in children have been: neurogenic bladder with diplegia (n=8), bladder exstrophy (n=2), traumatic loss of the bladder (n=1), urogenital sinus (n=1) and rhabdomyosarcoma of the prostate or bladder (n=2). Bladder augmentation was indicated in 6 children with iatrogenic bladder loss, in 5 children with neurogenic bladder without diplegia and in 4 boys with incontinent epispadias or exstrophy. In children with bladder exstrophy or incontinent epispadias, continence was achieved using a modified Young-Dees technique with formation of a long intra-abdominal muscular tube made out of the bladder plate or the low-capacity bladder. The capacity of the urinary reservoir was guaranteed by bladder augmentation or bladder replacement with an ileocaecal pouch. During a mean follow-up period of 26 months (bladder augmentation) and 21 months (continent diversion) there was only one postoperative complication (intussusception ileus) which required operative revision. Two children had to undergo reoperation because of nipple problems. Follow-up, with monitoring of biochemical and metabolic parameters, is necessary to show whether this technique will provide a long-term successful solution for these problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Winter CC (1984) Overview: caution needed in cystoplasty. In: Whithead ED, Leiter E (eds) Current operative urology, 2nd edn. Harper and Row, Philadelphia, p 837

    Google Scholar 

  2. Olsson CA (1984) Editorial: Continent urinary diversion. J Urol 132: 1157

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thüroff JW, Alken P, Engelmann U, Riedmiller H, Jacobi G, Hohenfellner R (1985) Der MAINZ-Pouch zur Blasenerweiterungsplastik und kontinenten Harnableitung. Aktuel Urol 16: 1

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thüroff JW, Alken P, Engelmann U, Riedmiller H, Jacobi G, Hohenfellner R (1986) The MAINZ-pouch (mixed augmentation ileum and cecum) for bladder augmentation and continent diversion. J Urol 136: 17

    Google Scholar 

  5. Altwein JE, Hohenfellner R (1975) Use of the colon as a conduit for urinary diversion. Surg Gynecol Obstet 140: 33

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mansson W, Colleen S, Sundin T (1984) Continent cecal reservoir in urinary diversion. Br J Urol 56: 359

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hohenfellner R, Marberger M (1976) Colon conduit. In: Bergsma D, Duckett WD (eds) Urinary system malformation in children. Proceedings of the International Pediatric Urology Seminar, Philadelphia. Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hohenfellner R, Marberger M (1976) Open transcolonic ureterosigmoidostomy. In: Bergsma D, Duckett WD (eds) Urinary system malformation in children. Proceedings of the International Pediatric Urology Seminar, Philadelphia. Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hinman F Jr (1989) Selection of intestinal segments of bladder substitution. J Urol (in press)

  10. Wilbert D, Hohenfellner R (1984) Colonic conduit: preoperative requirements, operative technique, postoperative management. World J Urol 2: 159

    Google Scholar 

  11. Riedmiller H, Becht E, Hertle L, Jacobi G, Hohenfellner R (1984) Psoas-hitch ureteroneocystostomy: experience with 181 cases. Eur Urol 10: 145

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roehrborn CG, Teigland DM, Sagalowsky AI, Markey K (1986) Comparative urodynamic assessment in patients with four different forms of urinary diversion. J Urol 135: 155A

    Google Scholar 

  13. Braren V, Workman CH, Johns OT, Brooks AL, Rhamy RK (1979) Use of the umbilical area for placement of an urinary stoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 148: 543

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hanna MK, Bloiso G (1987) Continent diversion in children, modification of Kock-pouch. J Urol 137: 1206

    Google Scholar 

  15. Colodny HC (1974) Bladder injury during herniorrhaphy manifested by ascites and azotemia. Urology 3: 89

    Google Scholar 

  16. Redman JF, Jacks DW, O'Donnell PD (1985) Cystectomy: a catastrophic complication of herniorrhaphy. J Urol 133: 97

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reifferscheid R, Eckstein HB, Flach A, Rager K (1973) Wandnekrosen der harnblase des Neugeborenen als Komplikation eines Nabelkatheters. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 98: 727

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mihatsch MJ, Ohnacker H, Herzog B, Goldschmidt H (1974) Bladder necrosis caused by use of than in a newborn infant. J Urol 111: 835

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hendren WH (1978) Some alternatives to urinary diversion in children. J Urol 119: 652

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riedmiller, H., Thüroff, J., Stöckle, M. et al. Continent urinary diversion and bladder augmentation in children: the Mainz pouch procedure. Pediatr Nephrol 3, 68–74 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00859629

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00859629

Key words

Navigation