Skip to main content
Log in

Automatic generation of group technology families during the part classification process

  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Initial part family formation and subsequent part classification are two important problems to be addressed in applying the group technology principle. Although these two problems are closely related, they have been treated separately. As an aggregate problem, the automatic creation of new part families during the classification process, is investigated. A two-layer neural network using the adaptive resonance theory is adopted. The capability of this neural network model of dealing with the stability-plasticity dilemma is utilised in classifying the parts into families and creating new families if necessary. A heuristic algorithm using the neural network is described, with illustrative examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. L. Hyer and U. Wemmerlöv, “Group technology and productivity”,Harvard Business Review, pp. 140–149, July–August 1984.

  2. N. L. Hyer and U. Wemmerlöv, “Group technology in the US manufacturing industry: a survey of current practices”,International Journal of Production Research,27(8), pp. 1287–1304, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. U. Wemmerlöv and N. L. Hyer, “Cellular manufacturing in US industry: a survey of users”,International Journal of Production Research,27(9), pp. 1511–1530, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. R. King, “Machine-component grouping in production flow analysis: an approach using a rank order clustering algorithm”,International Journal of Production Research,18(2), pp. 213–232, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Vannelli, and K. R. Kumar, “A method for finding minimal bottle-neck cells for grouping part-machine families”,International Journal of Production Research,24(2), pp. 387–400, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Han and I. Ham, “Multibjective cluster analysis for part family formations”,Journal of Manufacturing Systems,5(4), pp. 223–230, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. L. Wu, R. Venugopal and M. M. Barash, “Design of a cellular manufacturing system: a syntactic pattern recognition approach”,Journal of Manufacturing Systems,5(2), pp. 81–87, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. L. Burbidge, “Production flow analysis”,Production Engineer, April/May, pp. 139–152, 1971.

  9. J. L. Batra and R. Rajagopalan, “Composite component through graphs and fuzzy clusters”, Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, UK, pp. 801–807, 1977.

  10. J. Peklenik and J. Grum, “Investigation of the computer aided classification of parts”,Annals of the CIRP,29(1), pp. 319–323, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. J. Shah and A. S. Bhatnagar, “Group technology classification from feature-based geometric models”,Manufacturing Review,2(3), pp. 204–213, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. A. ElMaraghy and P. Gu, “Feature based expert parts assignment in cellular manufacturing”,Journal of Manufacturing Systems,8(2), pp. 139–152, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Xu and H. Wang, “Part family formation for GT applications based on fuzzy mathematics”,International Journal of Production Research,27(9), pp. 1637–1651, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. B. Moon, “An interactive activation and competition model for machine-part family formation in group technology”, Proceedings, International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Washington, DC, vol. 2, pp. 667–670, 15–19 January 1990.

  15. Y. Kao and Y. B. Moon, “Learning part families by the backpropagation rule of neural networks”, Proceedings, First International Conference on Automation Technology, Hsinchu, Taiwan, pp. 819–824, 4–6 July 1990.

  16. J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart and G. E. Hinton, “The appeal of parallel distributed processing”, in D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland (eds),Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., vol. 1, ch. 1, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. Carpenter and S. Grossberg, “A massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine”,Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Understanding,37, pp. 54–115, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Carpenter and S. Grossberg, “ART 2: self-organization of stable category recognition codes for analog input patterns”,Applied Optics,26(23), pp. 4919–4930, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. D. Wasserman,Neural Computing: Theory and Practice, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Moore, “ART 1 and Pattern Clustering”, Proceedings, 1988 Connectionist Models, Summer School at Carnegie Mellon University, pp. 174–185, 17–26 June 1988.

  21. Y. H. Pao,Adaptive Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. P. Chandrasekharan and R. Rajagopalan, “Groupability: an analysis of the properties of binary data matrices for group technology”,International Journal of Production Research,27, pp. 1035–1052, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. S. Carrie, “Numerical taxonomy applied to group technology and plant layout”,International Journal of Production Research,11, pp. 399–416, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moon, Y.B., Kao, Y. Automatic generation of group technology families during the part classification process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 8, 160–166 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01749906

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01749906

Keywords

Navigation