Abstract
An attempt is made to establish the most appropriate examination procedure for staging rectal carcinoma by computed tomography (CT). Twentytwo patients with rectal carcinoma had CT performed preoperatively. The following three CT sequences were performed in all patients: a precontrast scan with 10-mm slices; a rapid sequence scan with 5-mm slices during bolus injection of contrast medium; and a postcontrast scan after a 10-min delay. Tumor extension and the presence of perirectal lymph nodes were evaluated separately and independently in all three CT sequences according to the TNM classification. All patients had surgical follow-up and the CT scans were compared to the surgical and histopathological findings. There was no significant difference in diagnostic outcome in the three CT procedures. Information obtained by frontal and lateral scout views were compared, and the lateral scout view proved more informative than the frontal scout view. For staging rectal carcinoma, narrow slice scanning and intravenous contrast media are superfluous and should be reserved for special cases. We recommend the use of lateral scout views.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baert AL, Roex L, Wilms G, Marchal G, Deschepper C. Computed tomography of the rectum with water as contrast agent.Gastrointest Radiol 1989;14:345–348
Angelelli G, Macarini L, Lupo L, Caputi-Jambrenghi O, Pannarale O, Memeo V. Rectal carcinoma: CT staging with water as contrast medium.Radiology 1990;177:511–514
Rifkin MD, Ehrlich SM, Marks GM. Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT.Radiology 1989;170:319–322
Thompson WM, Halvorson RA, Foster WL, Roberts L, Gibbons R. Preoperative and postoperative CT staging of rectosigmoid carcinoma.AJR 1986;146:703–710
Beynon J, Mortensen NJM, Foy DMA, Channer JL, Virjee J, Goddard P. Preoperative assessment of local invasion in rectal cancer: digital examination, endoluminal sonography or computed tomography?Br J Surg 1986;73:1015–1017
McCarthy SM, Barnes D, Deveney K, Moss AA, Goldberg HI. Detection of recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective evaluation of CT and clinical factors.AJR 1985;144:577–579
Nanakawa S, Takahashi M, Kojima R, Takagi K, Fujiyoshi T, Takano M. Preoperative computed tomography staging of rectal carcinoma.Clin Imag 1989;13:29–35
Solomon A, Michowitz M, Papo J, Yust I. Computed tomographic air enema technique to demonstrate colonic neoplasms.Gastrointest Radiol 1986;11:194–196
Adalsteinsson B, Glimelius B, Graffman S, Hemmingsson A, Påhlman L. Computed tomography in staging of rectal carcinoma.Acta Radiol 1985;26:45–55
Van Waes PFGM, Koehler PR, Feldberg MAM. Management of rectal carcinoma: impact of computed tomography.AJR 1983;140:1137–1142
Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Hulnick D, Naidich DP. Carcinoma of the colon: detection and preoperative staging by CT.AJR 1988;150:301–306
Williams NS, Durdey P, Quirke P et al. Pre-operative staging of rectal neoplasm and its impact on clinical management.Br J Surg 1985;72:868–874
Freeny PC, Marks WM, Ryan JA, Bolen JW. Colorectal carcinoma evaluation with CT: preoperative staging and detection of postoperative recurrence.Radiology 1986;158:347–353
Moss AA. Imaging of colorectal carcinoma.Radiology 1989;170:308–310
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skriver, E.B., Nielsen, M.B., Qvitzau, S. et al. Comparison of precontract, postcontrast, and delayed CT scanning for the staging of rectal carcinoma. Gastrointest Radiol 17, 267–270 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888564
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888564