Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of hysterosalpingography in evaluating endometriosis

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Endometriosis is a common disease in young women being evaluated for infertility. Although endometriosis may cause tubal abnormalities on hysterosal-pingography, efficacy of radiographic evaluation in this disease is not clear. We reviewed the radiographic and laparoscopic examinations in 50 women being studied for infertility. Laparoscopy was normal in 15 women and showed endometriosis in 35 patients. Endometriosis was staged at laparoscopy using the classification of the American Fertility Society. Radiographic examinations were reviewed blindly and tubal status noted in each patient. Criteria for tubal abnormality included incomplete or absent filling and ampullary dilatation or convolution. Radiographic efficacy was determined by correlating the tubal appearance to the severity and location of endometriosis. A total of 98 tubes were correlated but only 10 (10%) were felt to be involved by endometriosis based on laparoscopic findings. Radiologic sensitivity was 40% (4 of 10) and specificity was 83% (73 of 88). Positive predictive value was 21% (4 of 19) due to 15 false-positive diagnoses in tubes uninvolved by endometriosis. In conclusion, endometriosis, regardless of its severity, rarely causes radiographic abnormalities on hysterosalpingography because of the location of disease in the pelvis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buttram VC Jr. Endometriosis. In Behrman SJ, Kistner RW, Patton GW Jr, eds. Progress in infertility, 3rd ed. Boston: Little,Brown, 1988:273–329

    Google Scholar 

  2. Strathy JH, Molgaard CA, Coulam CB, Melton LJ III. Endometriosis and infertility: a laparoscopic study of endometriosis among fertile and infertile women. Fertil Steril 1982;38:667–672

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wood GP. Laparoscopic examination of the normal infertile woman. Obstet Gynecol 1983;62:642–643

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weitzman GA, Buttram VC. Classification of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1989;16:61–77

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adamson GD. Diagnosis and clinical presentation of endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:568–569

    Google Scholar 

  6. Siegler AM. Hysterosalpingography. Fertil Steril 1983;40:139–158

    Google Scholar 

  7. Belaish J. Hysterographic images of genital endometriosis. Contrib Gynecol Obstet 1987;16:109–118

    Google Scholar 

  8. Winfield AC, Wentz AC. Diagnostic imaging of infertility, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1987:105–125

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen YM, Ott DJ, Pittaway DE, Fayez JA, Gelfand DW. Efficacy of hysterosalpingography in evaluating tubal and peritubal disease in 200 patients with infertility. Rays 1988;13:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karasick S, Goldfarb AF. Peritubal adhesions in infertile women: diagnosis with hysterosalpingography. AJR 1989;152:777–779

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ott DJ, Fayez JA. Hysterosalpingography: a text and atlas. Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1991:103–125

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yoder IC, Hall DA. Hysterosalpingography in the 1990's. AJR 1991;157:675–683

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, W.K., Ott, D.J., Chen, M.Y.M. et al. Efficacy of hysterosalpingography in evaluating endometriosis. Abdom Imaging 19, 278–280 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203528

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203528

Key words

Navigation