Skip to main content
Log in

Adrenal nonhyperfunctioning adenoma and nonadenoma: CT attenuation value as discriminative index

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

When an asymptomatic adrenal mass is incidentally discovered on abdominal CT scans, the distinction between a nonhyperfunctioning adenoma and a nonadenoma would be important.

Methods

We evaluated the CT findings of 36 adrenal masses (14 nonhyperfunctioning adenomas, 22 nonadenomas) in 34 patients with no evidence of hormonal hypersecretion. CT attenuation values of adrenal masses on CT scans were calculated by setting a circular region of interest as large as possible in the center of each adrenal mass.

Results

Below 20 HU in CT attenuation values, all adrenal masses, except one case of ganglioneuroma with myxomatous change, were nonhyperfunctioning adenomas. With an arbitrary threshold of 20 HU, the sensitivity of CT attenuation values in distinguishing nonhyperfunctioning adenomas from nonadenomas was 64%, the specificity was 95%, and the accuracy was 83%. When decreasing the threshold to 15 HU, the sensitivity was 64%, the specificity was 100%, and the accuracy was 86%. The CT attenuation value on noncontrast CT was more useful for making this distinction than the size and interior homogeneity.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that an asymptomatic adrenal mass with homogeneous low attenuation (≦15 HU) and less than or equal to 4 cm indicates a nonhyperfunctioning adenoma, and no further examinations are necessary. CT attenuation value on non-contrast CT is the most important discriminatory factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee MJ, Hahn PF, Papanicolaou NP, Egglin TK, Saini S, Mueller PR, Simeone JF. Benign and malignant adrenal masses: CT distinction with attenuation coefficients, size, and observer analysis.Radiology 1991;179:415–418

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hussain S, Belldergrun A, Seltzer SE, Richie JP, Gittes RF, Abrams HL. Differentiation of malignant from benign adrenal masses: predictive indices on computed tomography.AJR 1985;144:61–65

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Paivansalo M, Lande S, Merikanto J, Kaliionen M. Computed tomography in primary and secondary adrenal tumors.Acta Radiol 1988;29:519–522

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berland LL, Koslin DB, Kenney PJ, Stanley RJ, Lee JY. Differentiation between small benign and malignant adrenal masses with dynamic incremental CT,AJR 1988;151:95–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oliver TW, Bernardino ME, Miller JI, Mansour K, Greene D, Davis WA. Isolated adrenal masses in nonsmall-cell bronchogenic carcinoma.Radiology 1984;153:217–218

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Erkel AR, van Gils APG, Lequin M, Kruitwagen C, Bloem JL, Falke THM. CT and MR distinction of adenomas and nonadenomas of the adrenal gland.J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994;18:432–438

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Francis IR, Smid A, Gross MD, Shapiro B, Naylor B, Glazer GM. Adrenal masses in oncologic patients: functional and morphologic evaluation.Radiology 1988;166:353–356

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsushima Y, Ishizaka H, Matsumoto M. Adrenal masses: differentiation with chemical shift, fast low-angle shot MR imaging.Radiology 1993;186:705–709

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krestin GP, Friedmann G, Fischback R, Neufang KFR, Allolio B. Evaluation of adrenal masses in oncologic patients: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR vs CT.J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:104–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miyake, H., Takaki, H., Matsumoto, S. et al. Adrenal nonhyperfunctioning adenoma and nonadenoma: CT attenuation value as discriminative index. Abdom Imaging 20, 559–562 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01256711

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01256711

Key words

Navigation