Abstract
Public policy making in resources management is greatly influenced by the institutional arrangements that arise out of the legal powers, administrative structures, and financial provisions of the decision system. In British Columbia, the institutional arrangements for energy planning in the province have been greatly altered by the passage of the Utilities Commission Act in 1980. This act redefines the policy implementation process for energy in British Columbia and provides for the regulation of the province's power utility, B.C. Hydro. This is the first time that the hitherto autonomous utility has been subject to regulation and the Utilities Commission Act represents a major reform in the institutional arrangements for energy planning in the province. The article evaluates the effectiveness of the 1980 B.C. Utilities Commission Act and assesses the impact of the legislation upon the institutional arrangements for energy planning in the province. Data for the article were derived from written sources and a series of personal interviews with key participants involved with energy planning in B.C.
It is shown that the act represented a major departure in the management of energy resources in B.C. Moreover the implementation of the act's provisions, particularly in regard to B.C. Hydro, had a dramatic impact on the development of new energy projects in the province. It is suggested that while the political and economic climate during the period also favored restraint, the major influence on “taming” the utility was passage of the Utilities Commission Act. The article concludes by exploring the implications of policy changes that have occurred as a consequence of the act's impact on B.C. Hydro.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Bankes, N., and A. R. Thompson. 1980. Monitoring for impact assessment and management. Westwater Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
BCUC. 1983a. Site C report: report and recommendations to the lieutenant governor-in-council. BCUC, Vancouver.
BCUC. 1983b. Site C report: appendices. BCUC, Vancouver.
BCUC. 1983c. Site C report: review procedures and recommendations for future reviews. BCUC, Vancouver.
BCUC. 1983d. Decision in the matter of British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority applications for rate relief. BCUC, Vancouver.
Dexter, L. A. 1970. Elite and specialized interviewing. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois.
Economic Council of Canada. 1985. Connections: an energy strategy for the future. Supply and Services, Canada, Ottawa.
ELUCS. 1977a. Guidelines for linear development. British Columbia, Environment and Land Use Committee Secretariat, Queen's Printer, Victoria, B.C.
ELUCS. 1977b. Guidelines for benefit-cost analysis. British Columbia, Environment and Land Use Committee Secretariat, Queens's Printer, Victoria, B.C.
ELUCS. 1980. Environmental and social impact compensation/mitigation guidelines. British Columbia, Environment and Land Use Committee Secretariat, Queen's Printer, Victoria, B.C.
EMPR. 1980. An energy secure British Columbia: the challenge and the opportunity. British Columbia, Environment and Land Use Committee Secretariat, British Columbia, Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Queen's Printer, Victoria, B.C.
EMR. 1987. Electric Power in Canada, 1986. Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Supply and Services, Ottawa, Canada.
Fox, I.K. 1983. Dam cost is crippling. Vancouver Sun, 11 April 1983, p. 5.
Henry, K. A. 1982. Major water projects: how governments decide. Unpublished paper, CBA Engineering Ltd, Vancouver, B.C.
Keenleyside, H. L. 1982. Memoirs of Hugh L. Keenleyside, vol. 2: on the bridge of time. McClelland and Stewart, Toronto.
Payne, R. W. 1982. Electric power and the changing role of regulation in British Columbia. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Institute of Public Administration of Canada, Toronto, August 1982.
Sabatier, P. A., and D. A. Mazmanian. 1981. The implementation of public policy: a framework of analysis. Pages 3–35,in D. A. Mazmanian and P. A. Sabatier (eds.), Effective policy implementation. Lexington, Toronto.
Sjoberg, G., and R. Nett. 1968. A methodology for social research. Harper and Row, New York.
Smith, L. G. 1982a. Public participation at a normative level: electric power planning in Ontario. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Waterloo, Ontario.
Smith, L. G. 1982b. Mechanisms for public participation at a normative planning level in Canada.Canadian Public Policy 8(no. 4):561–572.
Smith, L. G. 1983a. Alternative mechanisms for public participation in environmental policy making.Environments 14(no. 3):21–34.
Smith, L. G. 1987. The evolution of public participation in Canada: implications for participatory practice.British Journal of Canadian Studies 2(no. 2):213–235.
SPEC (Society Promoting Enviromental Conservation). 1983. The case against Site C. Information pamphlet, SPEC, Vancouver, B.C., July 1983.
Stebbins, R. A. 1972. The unstructured interview as incipient interpersonal relationship.Sociology and Social Research 56:164–179.
Vining, A. R. 1981. Provincial hydro utilities. Pages 149–188in A. Tupper, and G. B. Doern (eds.), Public corporations and public policy in Canada. Institute for Research on Public Policy, Montreal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, L.G. Taming B.C. Hydro: Site C and the implementation of the B.C. Utilities Commission Act. Environmental Management 12, 429–443 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01873257
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01873257