Skip to main content
Log in

Videotunneler for minimal and direct access aortoiliac reconstructive surgery

  • Case Reports
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite improvements in surgical practice and postoperative care, the large vertical midline or transverse transperitoneal approaches used in abdominal aortic surgery are still associated with a relatively high perioperative morbidity and mortality rate even in patients who are considered good risks for undergoing aortic surgery. This significant perioperative morbidity is partly caused by the major surgical trauma. To decrease the surgical stress on these patients we have developed a less-extensive procedure for this type of vascular reconstruction.

Technique: The abdominal aorta is explored using a special retractor through a short upper median minilaparotomy utilizing modified conventional surgical hand instruments. For an aortobifemoral graft implantation, a retroperitoneal tunnel is necessary. During the creation of this tunnel special care should be exercised to avoid troublesome hemorrhage with iliac and other vein lacerations. To overcome these difficulties, we have developed a new tunneling device, which allows us to have visual control of the tunneling procedure. This prototype device contains a semiflexible tube with an inflatable balloon and a flexible videoendoscope. It is introduced along the external iliac artery into the retroperitoneal space and creates a tunnel through step-by-step inflation of the balloon. After this, the graft is implanted in the usual manner. To date, 19 abdominal vascular reconstructions have been performed with this method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brewster DC, Darling RC (1978) Optimal methods of aortoiliac reconstruction. Surgery 84: 739–748

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crawford ES, Bomberger RA, Glaeser DH, Saleh SA, Russel WL (1981) Aortoiliac occlusive disease: factors influencing survival and function following reconstructive operation over a twenty-five-year period. Surgery 90: 1055–1067

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weber G, Jako G (1994) “Minimal invasiver” Zugang für Aorto-Iliacale Rekonstruktion. Vasa 43: 29

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weber G (1994) Minimal and direct access- videoassisted- aortoiliac reconstructive surgery. Progress in angioscopy new interventional techniques and endovascular grafting. Harvard Medical School Department of Continuing Education CME course. Boston

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weber G, Strauss AL, Jako G (1995) Videokontrollierte “Minimal invasive” Freilegung der Bauchaorta durch retroperitonealen Zugang für Aorto-Iliakale Rekonstruktion. Chirurg 66: 146–150

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weber G, Jako G (1995) A new videoendoscope for minimal access abdominal vascular surgery. Inter Angio 14: 372

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weber G, Jako G (1995) Minimal access aortoiliac surgery under videoendoscopic control. Inter Angio 14: 194

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weber G, Jako RA, Jako G (1995) Initial experiences with a new type of videoendoscope for abdominal vascular surgery. Surg Endosc 9: 584

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weber G, Jako G (1995) Retroperitoneal “mini” approach for aortoiliac reconstructive surgery. Vasc Surg 5: 387

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weber, G., Jako, G.J. Videotunneler for minimal and direct access aortoiliac reconstructive surgery. Surg Endosc 10, 852–854 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00189550

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00189550

Key words

Navigation