Skip to main content
Log in

Immediate breast reconstruction by prosthesis: A safe technique for extensive intraductal and microinvasive carcinomas

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) by prosthesis is frequently proposed after mastectomy. However, due to the morbidity of this operation, especially the early implant removal rate, its indications remain controversial.

Methods: We have performed 141 IBR by prosthesis (saline or gel-filled implant, tissue expander) in a homogeneous population of patients with extensive intraductal or microinvasive carcinoma, diagnosed after an initial local excision. This prospective study was designed to assess the feasibility and morbidity of IBR for an “ideal” population, allowing wide cutaneous preservation, without preoperative or postoperative treatment.

Results: The early prosthesis removal rate (<2 months) was 0.7%, with only 2.1% of early surgical revisions and 3% of lymphoceles. Cutaneous complications (5%) were significantly correlated with the type of incision. Cosmetic results at 1 year were good or very good in 66% of cases, similar to the percentage observed after delayed reconstruction by prosthesis.

Conclusions: In this selected population, IBR by prosthesis did not induce any additional morbidity compared with mastectomy without reconstruction. IBR by prosthesis can be systematically proposed in cases of extensive intraductal or microinvasive carcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, Banfi A, Clemente C, De Lena M., et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy in patients with small cancer of the breast.N Engl J Med 1981;305:6–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, Wolmark N, Wickerham L, et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.N Engl J Med 1989;320:822–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Horton CE, Rosato FA, McGraw JB, Dowden RV. Immediate reconstruction following mastectomy for cancer.Clin Plast Surg 1979;6:37–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Albo RJ, Gruber R, Kahn R. Immediate breast reconstruction after modified mastectomy for carcinoma of the breast.Am J Surg 1980;140:131–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Webster DJ, Mansel RE, Hugues LE. Immediate reconstruction of the breast after mastectomy. Is it safe?Cancer 1984;53:1416–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Noone RB, Murphy JB. A six year experience with immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer.Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;76:258–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frazier TG, Noone RB. An objective analysis of immediate simultaneous reconstruction in the treatment of primary carcinoma of the breast.Cancer 1985;55:1202–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Georgiade GS, Riefkohl R, Cox E, McCarty KS, Seigler HF, Georgiade NG, et al. Long-term clinical outcome of immediate reconstruction after mastectomy.Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;76:415–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bailey MH, Smith JW, Casas L, Johnson P, Serra E, de la Fuente R, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction: reducing the risks.Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;83:845–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vinton AL, Traverso LW, Zehring RD. Immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy is as safe as mastectomy alone.Arch Surg 1990;125:1303–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eberlein TJ, Crespo LD, Smith BL, Hergrueter CA, Douville L, Eriksson E. Prospective evaluation of immediate reconstruction after mastectomy.Ann Surg 1993;218:29–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Barreau-Pouhaer L, Le MG, Rietjens M, Arriagada R, Contesso G, Martins R, et al. Risk factors for failure of immediate breast reconstruction with prosthesis after total mastectomy for breast cancer.Cancer 1992;70:1145–1151.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O'Brien W, Hasselgren PO, Hummel RP, Coith R, Hyams D, Kurtzman L, Neale H. Comparison of postoperative wound complications and early cancer recurrence between patients undergoing mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction.Am J Surg 1993;166:1–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little JW III. Psychosocial correlates of immediate versus delayed reconstruction of the breast.Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;xx:713–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Georgiade G, Georgiade N, McCarty KS Jr, Seigler HF. Rationale for immediate reconstruction of the breast following modified radical mastectomy.Ann Plast Surg 1982;8:20–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schuster RH, Rotter S, Boonn W, Efron G. The use of tissue expanders in immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy for cancer.Br J Plast Surg 1990;43:413–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kroll SS, Ames F, Singletary SE, Schusterman MA. The oncologic risks of skin preservation at mastectomy when combined with immediate reconstruction of the breast.Gynecol Obstet 1991;172:17–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Little JW III, Golembe EV, Fisher JB. The “living bra” in immediate and delayed reconstruction of the breast following mastectomy for malignant and nonmalignant disease.Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;68:392–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Becker H, Maraist F. Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy using a permanent tissue expander.South Med J 1987;80:154–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayes JA, Bryan RM. Wound healing following mastectomy.Aust NZJ Surg 1984;34:25–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nogushi M, Farashi M, Ohta N, Kitagawa H, Kinoshita K, Thomas M, et al. Mastectomy with and without immediate breast reconstruction using a musculocutaneous flap.Am J Surg 1993;166:279–83.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Elliot LF, Eskenazi L, Beegle PM, Podres PE, Drazan L. Immediate TRAM flap breast reconstruction: 128 consecutive cases.Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;92:217–27.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grotting JC, Urist MM, Maddox WA, Vasconez LO. Conventional TRAM flap versus free microsurgical TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;5:828–41.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, Miller MJ, Reele GP, Baldwin BJ, Robb GL, Altmyer CS, et al. The free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: one center's experience with 211 casesAnn Plast Surg 1994;32:234–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mansel RE, Horgan K, Webster DJT, Shrotria S, Hughes LE. Cosmetic results of immediate breast reconstruction post mastectomy: a follow-up study.Br J Surg 1986;73:813–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shrotria S, Webster DJT, Mansel RE, Hughes LE. Complications of rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps in breast surgery.Eur J Surg Oncol 1993;19:80–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gruber RP, Kahn RA, Lash H, Maser MR, Apfelberger DB, Laub DR. Breast reconstruction following mastectomy: a comparison of submuscular and subcutaneous techniques.Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;67:312–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dickson MG, Sharpe DT. The complications of tissue expansion in breast reconstruction.Br J Plast Surg 1987;40:629–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clough, K.B., Bourgeois, D., Falcou, MC. et al. Immediate breast reconstruction by prosthesis: A safe technique for extensive intraductal and microinvasive carcinomas. Annals of Surgical Oncology 3, 212–218 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02305803

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02305803

Key Words

Navigation