Skip to main content
Log in

Theoretical relationship between the optimal models of the vascular tree

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two models of optimal branching structure of the vascular tree are compared. Murray’s minimum work model derived from minimum energy loss due to flow and volume in the duct system is proved to be included as a mathematical group in the authors’ model defined by the minimum volume under determinant pressure, flow and position at the terminals. The problem about heterotypical trees which are identical at the terminal conditions but different in the topological order of branch combinations are discussed, applying the results of analyses on the equivalent duct of uniform terminal pressure trees. It is proved that the minimum work tree has the least energy loss compared with its heterotypical minimum volume trees and is a better model of branching structure of the vascular tree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Kamiya, A. and T. Togawa. 1972. “Optimal Branching Structure of the Vascular Tree.”Bull. Math. Biophysics,34, 431–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. D., 1926a. “The Physiological Principle of Minimum Work: I.”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.,12, 204–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1926b. “The Physiological Principle of Minimum Work: II.”Ibid.,,12, 299–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. 1967.Optimality Principle in Biology. London: Butterworths, pp. 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kamiya, A., Togawa, T. & Yamamoto, A. Theoretical relationship between the optimal models of the vascular tree. Bltn Mathcal Biology 36, 311–323 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461331

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461331

Keywords

Navigation