Skip to main content
Log in

A unifying concept for the amino acid code

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The structure of the genetic code is related to a Gray code, which is a plausible theoretical model for an amino acid code. The proposed model implies that the most important factor in shaping the code was the effects of mistakes in translation, not effects of mutations. Another possible implication is that the preservation of stiffness and flexibility at appropriate places in a protein chain is as important in protein structure as the appropriate placement of hydrophilic (external) and hydrophobic (internal) residues. Other results are a simple conceptualization of the relationships among the 20 amino acids and their relations to their codons. The detailed relationships are summarized in the following ‘similarity alphabet’: ala, thr, gly, pro, ser; asp, asn, glu, gln, lys; his, arg, trp, tyr, phe; leu, met, ile, val, cys; (ATGPS DNEQK HRWYF LMIVC in the one-letter code). This alphabet falls into four groups of amino acids: small, external, large, internal. The approximate relation of the groups to their codons is expressed as: the first base of a codon controls size—a purine means a small amino acid, a pyrimidine means large; the middle base controls cloisterednes—purine means external, pyrimidine means internal. These relationships express the minimum change principle upon which the code appears to be founded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Argyle, E. 1980. “A Similarity Ring for Amino Acids Based on Their Evolutionary Substitution Rates.”Origin Life 10, 357–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belzer, J. and A. Kent. 1976. “Codes and Coding.” In.Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology, eds J. Belzer, A. G. Holzman and A. Kent, Vol.1, pp. 88–113. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F. H. C. 1968. “The Origin of the Genetic Code.”J. molec. Biol. 38, 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayhoff, M. O. 1972, 1973, 1976, 1978.Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, Vol.5 and Supplements 1, 2 and 3. Washington, DC: National Biomedical Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, I. 1976. “Codes.” In:Encyclopedia of Computer Science, Eds. A. Ralston and C. L. Meek, pp. 210–215. New York: Petrocelli/Charter.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, S. and B. Robson. 1983. “What is a Conservative Substitution?”J. molec. Evol. 19, 171–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M. and G. W. Moore. 1977. “Use of Chou-Fasman Amino Acid Conformational Parameters to Analyze the Organization of the Genetic Code and to Construct Protein Genealogies.”J. molec. Evol. 10, 7–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grantham, R. 1974. “Amino Acid Difference Formula to Help Explain Protein Evolution.”Science 185, 862–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosjean, H. J., S. de Henau and D. M. Crothers. 1978. “On the Physical Basis for Ambiguity in Genetic Coding Interactions.”Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 610–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janin, J. 1979. “Surface and Inside Volumes in Globular Proteins.”Nature 277, 491–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jukes, T. H. 1973. “Possibilities for the Evolution of the Genetic Code from a Preceding Form.”Nature 246, 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungck, J. R. 1978. “The Genetic Code as a Periodic Table.”J. molec. Evol. 11, 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. and M. Wish. 1978.Multidimensional Scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, A. D. 1972. “Repeating Sequences and Gene Duplication in Proteins,”J. molec. Biol. 64, 417–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rackovsky, S. and H. A. Scheraga. 1977. “Hydrophobicity, Hydrophilicity, and the Radial and Orientational Distributions of Residues in Native Proteins.”Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 5248–5251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salemme, F. R., M. D. Miller and S. R. Jordan. 1977. “Structural Convergence During Protein Evolution.”Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 2820–2824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. 1962a. “The Analysis of Proximities: Multidimensional Scaling with an Unknown Function. 1..”Psychometrika 27, 125–140.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1962b. “The Analysis of Proximities: Multidimensional Scaling with an Unknown Function. II.”Psychometrika 27, 219–246.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — 1980. “Multidimensional Scaling, Tree-Fitting and Clustering.”Science 210, 390–398.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tanford, C. 1973.The Hydrophobic Effect, p. 121. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topal, M. D. and J. R. Fresco. 1976a. “Complementary Base Pariing and the Origin of Substitution Mutations.”Nature 263, 285–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1976b. “Base Pairing and Fidelity in Codon-Anticodon Interaction.”Nature 263, 289–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenden, R. V., P. M. Cullis and C. C. F. Southgate. 1979. “Water, Protein Folding, and the Genetic Code.”Science 206, 575–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurmbach, P. and K. H. Nierhaus. 1979. “Codon-Anticodon Interactions at the Ribosomal P (Peptidyl-t RNA) Site.”Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 2143–2147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swanson, R. A unifying concept for the amino acid code. Bltn Mathcal Biology 46, 187–203 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02460068

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02460068

Keywords

Navigation