Skip to main content
Log in

Midterm results in 500 titanium alloy straight femoral stem prostheses -cemented and cementless technique

  • Original articles
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Mid- and long term stability is still the major challenge in total hip replacement (THR). A consecutive series of cemented 250 cases and of uncemented 250 cases was analyzed in a prospective follow-up study. The femoral component of the BiCONTACT hip stem system with the same design for cemented and uncemented implantation was used. While the cemented stems had a smooth surface, the cementless implants were proximally coated with a microporous titanium plasmaspray (Plasmapore®). Follow-up time averaged 7 years for cemented and 6.5 years for uncemented THRs. Follow-up rate was 88.7% in cases treated with cemented stems and 93.1% in cases treated with an uncemented stem. The rate of aseptic loosening was 1.2% for the cemented version and 0.4% for the uncemented one. Radiological loosening could be observed in another 1.2% of the cemented stems but was not found in the uncemented cases. Our data suggest excellent midterm stability of both the cemented and the uncemented version of the BiCONTACT hip stem system. Early aseptic loosening especially of the cemented titanium alloy straight stem has not occurred in our series as reported recently. The prosthesis design and follow-up time may therefore play an important role. The long-term results for both cemented and uncemented BiCONTACT prostheses of our series are still to be evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alsema R, Deutman R, Mulder TJ (1994) Stanmore total hip replacement. A 15- to 16-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76: 240–244

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ballard WT, Callaghan JJ, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC (1994) The results of improved cementing techniques for total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. A ten-year follow-up study [see comments]. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76: 959–964

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beckenbaugh RD, Ilstrup DM (1978) Total hip arthroplasty. A review of three hundred and thirty-three cases with long follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 60-A: 306–313

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Weatherly GC (1980) The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop 150: 263–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Britton AR, Murray DW, Bulstrode CJ, McPherson K, Denham R (1997) Pain levels after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 79-B: 93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bryant MJ, Kernohan WG, Nixon JR, Mollan RAB (1993) A statistical analysis of hip scores. J Bone Joint Surg 75-B: 705–709

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dorr LD, Luckett M, Conaty JP (1990) Total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 45 years. Clin Orthop 260: 215–219

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorab RS, Covino BM, Borden LS (1993) The rationale for cementless revision total hip replacement with contemporary technology. Orthop Clin North Am 24: 627–633

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components. Clin Orthop 141: 17–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris WH, McGann WA (1986) Loosening of the femoral component after use of the medullary-plug cementing technique. Follow-up note with a minimum five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 68-A: 1064–1066

    Google Scholar 

  11. Malchau H, Herberts P, Ahnfelt L (1993) Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978–1990. Acta Orthop Scand 64: 497–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Martell JM, Pierson RH, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Maley M, Galante JO (1993) Primary total hip reconstruction with a titanium fiber-coated prosthesis inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 75-A: 554–571

    Google Scholar 

  13. Murray DW, Carr AJ, Bulstrode CJ (1995) Which primary total hip replacement? J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 77-B: 520–527

    Google Scholar 

  14. Murray DW, Britton AR, Bulstrode CJ (1997) Loss to follow-up matters. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 79-B: 254–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Neumann L, Freund KG, Sorenson KH (1994) Long-term results of Charnley total hip replacement. Review of 92 patients at 15 to 20 years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 76-B: 245–251

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oishi CS, Walker RH, Colwell CWJ (1994) The femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. Six to eight-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive patients after use of a third-generation cementing technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 76: 1130–1136

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Osorovitz P, Goutallier D (1994) Résultats clinques et radiographiques d'une série continue de 124 prothèses totales de hanche type Céraver-Ostéal avec courbe de survie à 9 ans. Rev Chir Orthop 80: 305–315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Owen TD, Moran CG, Smith SR, Pinder IM (1994) Results of uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 76-B: 258–262

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paterson M, Fulford P, Denham R (1986) Loosening of the femoral component after total hip replacement. The thin black line and the sinking hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 68-B: 392–397

    Google Scholar 

  20. Russotti GM, Coventry MB, Stauffer RN (1988) Cemented total hip arthroplasty with contemporary techniques. A five-year minimum follow-up study. Clin Orthop 235: 141–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmalzried TP, Harris WH (1993) Hybrid total hip replacement. A 6.5-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 75: 608–615

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schulte KR, Callaghan JJ, Kelley SS, Johnston RC (1993) The outcome of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty-year follow-up. The results of one surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 75-A: 961–975

    Google Scholar 

  23. Snorrason F, Kärrholm J, Löwenhielm G, Hietala S-O, Hansson LI (1989) Poor fixation of the Mittelmaier hip prosthesis. Acta Orthop Scand 60: 81–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sullivan PM, MacKenzie JR, Callaghan JJ, Johnston RC (1994) Total hip arthroplasty with cement in patients who are less than fifty years old. A sixteen to twenty-two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 76-A: 863–869

    Google Scholar 

  25. Volkmann R (1993) Das BiContact-Endopro-thesensystem- mittelfristige Ergebnisse nach 5jähriger Anwendung. Akt Traumatol 23 [Sonderheft]: 75–81

    Google Scholar 

  26. Volkmann R, Maurer F, Weller S (1994) Implantation technique for the BiCONTACT hip implant. In: Weller S, Volkmann R (eds) The BiCONTACT hip implant system. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 18–27

    Google Scholar 

  27. Willert HG, Brobäck LG, Buchhorn GH, Jensen PH, Köster G, Lang I, Ochsner P, Schenk R (1996) Crevice corrosion of cemented titanium alloy stems in total hip replacements. Clin Orthop 333: 51–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Volkmann, R., Eingartner, C., Winter, E. et al. Midterm results in 500 titanium alloy straight femoral stem prostheses -cemented and cementless technique. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 8, 133–139 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01682630

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01682630

Key words

Navigation