Summary
In this study the authors evaluated the grade of acceptance and the operating conditions of unilateral primary herniorrhaphy under local anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care (MAC). The amount of pain in the immediate postoperative period was assessed and the efficacy of treatment using a popular non-opiate analgesic, magnesic metamizol, by the oral route was studied. In a period of six months 63 consecutive patients were operated on by the same surgeon using the same technique of hernia repair (Shouldice technique) with local infiltration anesthesia supplemented by MAC in the form of conscious sedation. A mixture of 300 mg of plain mepivacaine and 50 mg of plain bupivacaine was used for infiltration. A standard dose of fentanyl 0.10 mg and midazolam 2 mg was used for conscious sedation. Propofol in continuous infusion was also employed. The average dose of propofol varied from 1–3 mg/kg/h. Conscious level was assessed using a five-point sedation score. A level-3 end point was persued (closed eyes, but answer verbal orders). Pain intensity in the postoperative period was measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the verbal pain scale (VPS), based on the McGill pain questionnaire. The operating conditions were excellent in all cases except in three patients. In no case conversion to general anesthesia was necessary. In the postoperative period, 5 patients (8%) never felt pain and 58 (92%) felt pain on the average 4 hours 36 minutes after the local infiltration (VAS=2.5; VPS=1.45). Of the 58 patients 49 took the first dose of oral analgesic 6 hours 40 minutes after infiltration (VAS=4; VPS=1.97). All patients were satisfied with the anesthetic-surgical technique and were ready to repeat the experience. However, when the patients took the second dose of oral analgesic 28% of them had moderate pain and 9% severe pain. Our conclusions are that local infiltration with MAC is a valid and satisfying experience for both the patient and the surgeon. Nevertheless, further attempts should be made to better the postoperative pain relief when the oral route is elected.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amrein R, Hetzel W (1990) Pharmacology of dormicum (midazolam) and anexate (flumazenil). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand [Suppl] 92: 6–15
Ben David B, Katz E, Gaitini L, Goldik Z (1995) Comparison of i.m. and local infiltration of ketorolac with and without local anaesthetic. Br J Anaesth 75: 409–412
Bugedo GJ, Carcano CR, Mertens RA (1990) Preoperative percutaneous ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block with 0,5% bupi-vacain for postherniorrhaphy pain management in adults. Reg Anaesth 15: 130–133
Clifford JW, Mun-Seng Chong (1993) Pre-emptive analgesia-treating postoperative pain by preventing the establishment of central sensitization. Anesth Analg 77: 362–397
Covino BG, Vasallo HG (1976) Local anesthetics: mecanisms of action and clinical use. Grune & Stratton, New York
Dueholm S, Forrest M, Hjorstso NC (1989) Pain relief following herniotomy: A double-blind randomized comparison between naproxen and placebo. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 33: 391–394
Erichsen CJ, Vibits H, Dahl JB, Kehlet H (1995) Wound infiltration with ropivacaine and bupivacaine for pain after inguinal herniotomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 39: 67–70
Hay JM, Boudet MJ, Fingerhut A, Poucher J, Hennet H, Habib E, Veyrieres M, Flamant Y (1995) Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in the male adult: the gold standard? A multi-center controlled trial in 1578 patients. Ann Surg 222: 719–727
Kehlet H (1994) Postoperative pain relief — What is the issue? Br J Anaesth 72: 375–378.
Kingsnorth AN, Wigesinha SS, Grixti CJ (1979) Evaluation of dextran with local anesthesia for short-stay inguinal herniorraphy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 61: 456–458
Mackenzie N, Grant IS (1987) Propofol for intravenous sedation. Anaesthesia 42: 3–6
Mc Clain DA, Hugh CC Jr (1980) Intravenous fentanyl kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 28: 106
Mc Quay HJ (1992) Pre-emptive analgesia. Br J Anaesth 69: 1–3
McEvoy A, Livingstone JI, Cahill CJ (1996) Comparison of diclofenac sodium and morphine sulphate for postoperative analgesia after day case inguinal hernia surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78: 363–366
Moore A, Collins D (1997) Paracetamol with and without codeine in acute pain: A quantitative systemic review. Pain 70: 193–201
Porrero Carro JL, García Villanueva A Herniorrafia de Shouldice. Consideraciones generales y aspectos técnicos. In: Porrero Carro JL (eds) Cirugía de la pared abdominal. Masson, Barcelona, pp 60–66
Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW (1994) A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain 56: 217–226
Raj PP (1994) Characteristics, classification and assessment of acute postoperative pain. Current review of pain Chapter II
Rawal N, Hylander J, Nydahl PA, Olofsson I, Gupta A (1997) Survey of postoperative analgesia following ambulatory surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 41: 1017–1022
Rutter DV, Morgan M, Lumley J, Owen R (1980) ICI 35868 (Diprivan): A new induction agent. A comparison with methohexitone. Anaesthesia 35: 1188–1192
Simon MP, Kleijnen J, van-Goldere D, Hoistsma HF, Obertop H (1996) Role of the Shouldice technique in inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review of controlled trials and a meta-analysis. Br J Surg 83: 734–738
Tverskoy M, Cozacov C, Ayache M (1990) Postoperative pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy with different types of anaesthesia. Anesth Analg 70: 29–35
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Porrero Carro, J.L., Sánchez-Cabezudo Díaz-Guerra, C. & Lee Wong, P. Postoperative analgesia in herniorrhaphy with local anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care. Hernia 2, 103–106 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01250022
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01250022