Skip to main content
Log in

Umbilical hernia, Mayo or mesh?

  • Short Reports
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Unlike inguinal herniorraphy, the results of surgery for umbilical hernia have been poorly audited. The extent to which the popular sutured repair of Mayo has given way to mesh-based repairs in recent years is also unknown. To investigate these deficiencies, a review was undertaken of 651 umbilical hernia repairs performed between April 1994 and March 1999 at a single institution by 10 general surgeons.

Excluding children and umbilical hernias repaired at laparotomy, a total of 473 primary adult hernias and 18 recurrent hernias were repaired. The proportion repaired for recurrence was 3.8%. Follow up ranges between 12 and 60 months (mean 27 months, median 25 months).

Of the 18 recurrences, there were 16 sutured repairs and 11 of the patients had predisposing factors for recurrence such as wound infection, obesity, chronic renal failure or ascites.

Sutured repair of primary umbilical hernias in this large series was successful in 96% of cases; in the remainder underlying co-morbidity was an important predisposing factor for recurrence.

This study does not support the routine use of mesh in primary adult umbilical hernia repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Askar OM (1978) A new concept of the aetiology and surgical repair of paraumbilical and epigastric hernias. Ann R Coll Surg Eng 60: 42–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Celdrán A, Bazire P, Garcia-Ureòa MA, Marijuán JL (1995) H-Hernioplasty: a tension-free repair for umbilical hernia. Br J Surg 82: 371–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin HB, Kingsnorth A (1998) Management of abdominal hernias. London: Chapman and Hall 211–216

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Ureòa MA, Rico P, Seoane J (1994) Hernia umbilical del adulto. Chirugía Españolo 56: 302–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianetta E, DeCian F, Cuneo S, Friedman D, Vitale B, Marinari G, Baschieri G, Camerini G (1997) Hernia repair in elderly patients Br I Surg 84: 983–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo WJ (1901) An operation for the radical cure of umbilical hernia. Ann Surg 34: 276–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul A, Korenkov M, Peters S, Kohler L, Fischer S, Troidl H (1998) Unacceptable results of the Mayo procedure for repair of abdominal incisional hernias. Eur J Surg 164: 361–367

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. N. Kingsnorth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bowley, D.M.G., Kingsnorth, A.N. Umbilical hernia, Mayo or mesh?. Hernia 4, 195–196 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201065

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201065

Key words

Navigation