Skip to main content
Log in

Reaction of swine to oil-adjuvanted inactivated foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine inoculated by intramuscular and subcutaneous routes

  • Published:
Archiv für die gesamte Virusforschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Local reactions at inoculation sites of swine vaccinated with foot-and-mouth disease antigens emulsified with oil adjuvant were examined at 7, 14, 32, 45, 62 and 90 days postinoculation. The serologic data indicate that either the subcutaneous or intramuscular route, as well as the different inoculation sites selected induce a similar antibody response. Lesions at all inoculation sites were characterized by subacute and chronic granulomatous tissue reaction and the continuous presence of oil vacuoles. There is little doubt that some degree of reaction at the site of inoculation is to be expected and thus the site and route are of utmost importance in reducing the possibility of a carcass blemish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albertsson, P. A.: Two phase separation of viruses. In: Methods in Virology (K. Maramorosch andH. Koprowski, eds.), Vol. II, pp. 303–321, New York-London: Academic Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, E. C.: Some observations on the serological response of pigs to emulsified foot-and-mouth disease vaccine. Report of the meeting of the Research Group of the Standing Technical Committee, European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, held in Brescia, Italy, September 24–26, 1969, pp. 177–190.

  3. Bradish, C. J., R. Jowett, andJ. B. Kirkham: The fixation of complement by virus-antibody complexes: Equivalence and inhibition in the reactions of the viruses of tomato bushy stunt and foot-and-mouth disease with rabbit and guinea pig antisera. J. gen. Microbiol.35, 27–51 (1964).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brandly, P. J., G. Migaki, andK. E. Taylor: Meat Hygiene, 3rd edition, p. 213, Philadelphia, Pa.: Lea and Febiger, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caporale, G., G. A. Rossi, andA. Pelliccioni: Vaccination of swine against foot-and-mouth disease with hydroxylamine and acetylethyleneimine inactivated virus. Vet. ital.XX, 137–147 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Capstick, P. B.: The infection of BHK-21, clone 13 by foot-and-mouth disease virus in deep suspension culture. IX International Congress for Microbiology, Moscow, p. 450 (1966).

  7. Cohrs, P., andF. Schulte: Aluminium hydroxydgranulome bei Tieren. Zbl. allg. Path. path. Anat.89, 77–82 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cowan, K. M., andR. Trautman: Immunochemical studies of foot-and-mouth disease. I. Complement-fixation reactions with isolated antigenic components. J. Immunol.99, 729–736 (1967).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cunliffe, H. R., andJ. H. Graves: Formalin-treated foot-and-mouth disease virus: Comparison of two adjuvants in cattle. Canad. J. comp. Med.27, 193–197 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Federer, K. E., R. Burrows, andJ. B. Brooksby: Vesicular stomatitis virus: The relationship between some strains of the Indiana serotype. Reg. Vet. Sci.8, 103–117 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graves, J. H.: Foot-and-mouth disease vaccine: Immune response of cattle to different inactivated serotype antigens in monovalent and trivalent mixtures. J. Immunol.102, 58–62 (1969).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gray, J. E.: Local histologic changes following long-term intramuscular injections. Arch. Path.84, 522–527 (1967).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hardegree, M. C., andM. Pittman: Influence of antigens on release of free fatty acids from Arlacel A (mannide mono-oleate). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.)123, 179–184 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Henderson, W. M.: A comparison of different routes of inoculation of cattle for detection of the virus of foot-and-mouth disease. J. Hyg. (Lond.)50, 182–194 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lillie, R. D.: Histopathologic Technic and Practical Histochemistry, 3rd edition, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Martin, W. B., andW. A. Chapman: The tissue culture color test for assaying the virus and neutralizing antibody of foot-and-mouth disease and its application to the measurement of immunity in cattle. Res. Vet. Sci.2, 53–61 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  17. McKercher, P. D., andA. R. Giordano: Foot-and-mouth disease in swine. I. The immune response of swine to chemically-treated and nontreated foot-and-mouth disease virus. Arch. ges. Virusforsch.20, 39–53 (1967).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McKercher, P. D., andP. Gailiunas: Response of swine to inactivated foot-and-mouth disease vaccine. Arch. ges. Virusforsch.28, 165–176 (1969).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McKercher, P. D., and D. O.Morgan: Immune response of swine to revaccination with an oil adjuvant, inactivated foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine. Report of the meeting of the Research Group of the Standing Technical Committee, European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, held in Brescia, Italy, September 24–26, 1969, pp. 170–176.

  20. Messow, C: Durch chemische Agentien erzeugte Granulome. Path. Vet.2, 142–160 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Morgan, D. O., P. D.McKercher, and H. L.Bachrach: Immunogenicity of nanogram to milligram quantities of inactivated foot-and-mouth disease virus. II. Comparative response of guinea pigs and steers. Proc. USLSA, 72nd annual meeting, pp. 407–415, 1968.

  22. Wittmann, G., andK. Bauer: Örtliche Reaktionen nach der Impfung von Schweinen mit Maul- und Klauenseuche-(MKS-)Vakzinen, die Freund'sches Adjuvans enthalten. Berl. Münch. tierärztl. Wschr.82, 2–4 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wittmann, G., K. Bauer, andM. Mussgay: Versuche zur Schutzimpfung von Schweinen mit Vakzinen aus inaktiviertem Maul- und Klauenseuche-(MKS-) Virus. II. Versuche mit aethylaethylenimin (EEI-) inaktiviertem Virus und Diaethylaminoaethyl-Dextran (DEAE-D) als Adjuvans. Arch. ges. Virusforsch.29, 139–158 (1970).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKercher, P.D., Gailiunas, P., Burrows, R. et al. Reaction of swine to oil-adjuvanted inactivated foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine inoculated by intramuscular and subcutaneous routes. Archiv f Virusforschung 35, 364–377 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01241917

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01241917

Keywords

Navigation