Skip to main content
Log in

Periplast structure of the cryptomonad flagellateHemiselmis brunnescens

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The periplast ofHemiselmis brunnescens Butcher is a complex cell covering comprised of the plasma membrane (PM) sandwiched between a surface periplast component (SPC) and an inner periplast component (IPC). The SPC is revealed by deep-etching, and consists of hexagonal plates composed of tripartite subunits that appear to self-assemble into a crystalline layer with a hexagonal symmetry. Small scales (termed fibrillar scales) accumulate on the crystalline plates during cell growth, eventually forming a “carpet” that itself may appear crystalline when fully formed. Heptagonal “rosette scales” are occasionally observed on the surface as well. The position of the crystalline plates is precisely mirrored by both the E and P fracture faces of the PM. The plate proper is underlain by membrane with a high concentration of intramembrane particles (IMPs) while the bands of membrane underlying the plate borders lack IMPs. Access of subunits and fibrillar scales to the cell surface following initial plate formation appears to be at the plate boundaries. This study suggests that cryptomonad flagellates may provide model systems for studying the self-assembly of cell surface components, and for relating membrane structure to function, as evidence suggests a major role for the PM in mediating periplast assembly and development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brett, S., Wetherbee, R., 1986: A comparative study of periplast structure inCryptomonas cryophila andC. ovata (Cryptophyceae). Protoplasma131, 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catt, J. W., Hills, G. J., Roberts, K., 1976: A structural glycoprotein, containing hydroxyproline, isolated from the cell wall ofChlamydomonas reinhardii. Planta (Berl.)131, 165–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, M. A., 1974: Structure of the periplast ofCryptomonas ovata var.palustris. J. Phycol.10, 121–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantt, E., 1971: Micromorphology of the periplast ofChroomonas (Cryptophyceae). J. Phycol.7, 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim, J. N., Staehelin, L. A., 1984: The ejectisomes of the flagellateChilomonas paramecium: Visualization by freeze-fracture and isolation techniques. J. Protozool.3 (12), 259–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillard, R. R. L., Ryther, J., 1962: Studies on marine planktonic diatoms. I.Cyclotella nana Hustedt andDetonula confervaceae (Cleve)Gran. Can. J. Microbiol.8, 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, K., Walz, B., 1979: Periplastruktur und Organisation der Plasmamembran vonRhodomonas spec. (Cryptophyceae). Protoplasma101, 349–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. R. A.,Wetherbee, R., 1986:Proteomonas sulcata gen. et sp. nov. (Cryptophyceae), a cryptomonad with two morphologically distinct and alternating forms. Phycologia (in press).

  • Ludwig, M., Gibbs, S. P., 1985: DNA present in the nucleomorph ofCryptomonads: further evidence that the chloroplast evolved from a eukaryotic endosymbiont. Protoplasma127, 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, G. I., Wetherbee, R., 1985: Flagellar regeneration and associated scale deposition inPyramimonas gelidicola (Prasinophyceae, Chlorophyta). Protoplasma128, 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moestrup, Ø., Walne, P. L., 1979: Studies on scale morphogenesis in the Golgi apparatus ofPyramimonas tetrarhynchus (Prasinophyceae). J. Cell Sci.36, 437–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennick, N. C., 1981: Flagellar scales inHemiselmis brunnescens Butcher andH. virescens Droop. Arch. Protistenk.124, 267–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1982: Observations of the fine structure ofHemiselmis brunnescens Butcher. Arch. Protistenk.126, 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanovicz, D. K., 1981: Scale formation in flagellates. In: Cell Biology Monographs (Kiermayer, O., ed.),8, pp. 27–62. Wien-New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santore, U. J., 1977: Scanning electron microscopy and comparative micromorphology of the periplast ofHemiselmis rufescens, Chroomonas sp. and members of the genusCryptomonas (Cryptophyceae). Br. phycol. J.12, 255–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1982 a: The ultrastructure ofHemiselmis brunnescens andHemiselmis virescens with additional observation onHemiselmis rufescens and comments on theHemiselmidaceae as a natural group of theCryptophyceae. Br. Phycol. J.17, 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1982 b: Comparative ultrastructural of two members of theCryptophyceae assigned to the genusChroomonas-with comments on their taxonomy. Arch. Protistenk.125, 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1983: Flagellar and body scales in theCryptophyceae. Br. Phycol. J.18, 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Some aspects of taxonomy in theCryptophyceae. New Phytol.98, 627–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleytr, U. B., Messner, P., 1983: Crystalline surface layers on bacteria. Ann. Rev. Microbiol.37, 311–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staehelin, L. A., Pickett-Heaps, J. D., 1975: The ultrastructure ofScenedesmus (Chlorophyceae). 1. Species with the “reticulate” or “warty” type of ornamental layer. J. Phycol.11, 163–185.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wetherbee, R., Hill, D.R.A. & McFadden, G.I. Periplast structure of the cryptomonad flagellateHemiselmis brunnescens . Protoplasma 131, 11–22 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01281683

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01281683

Keywords

Navigation