Skip to main content
Log in

Scanning electron microscopy of barley protoplasts

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Scanning electron micrographs of barley protoplasts were compared using various preparatory techniques. Numerous features were observed which turned out to be artifactual characteristics of the processing procedure used in collecting and dehydrating the samples. The most successful technique gave protoplasts which presumably maintained their natural structural integrity, as judged by retention of sphericity and absence of holes in the plasma membrane. The relative numbers of fragmented protoplasts and cellular organelles was also greatly reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T. F., 1951: Techniques for preservation of three-dimensional structure in preparing specimens for the electron microscope. Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci.13, 130–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunk, V., P. Bell, P. Colling, N. Forsby, andB. A. Fredriksson, 1975: SEM ofin vitro cultivated cells, osmotic effects during fixation. In: Scanning electron microscopy (O. Johari andI. Corvin, eds.), pp. 379–386. Chicago: IITRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. M., andS. Glagov, 1976: Evaluation and publication of scanning electron micrographs. Science192, 360–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocking, E. C., 1973: Plant cell modifications; problems and perspectives. Colloq. Int. C.N.R.S.212, 327–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Harven, E., N. Lampen, A. Polliack, A. Warfel, andJ. Fogh, 1975: New observations on methods for preparing cell suspensions for scanning electron microscopy. In: Scanning electron microscopy (O. Johari andI. Corvin, eds.), pp. 361–368. Chicago: IITRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D., 1972: Transformationen an höheren Organismen. Naturwissenschaften59, 348–355.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heyn, R. F., A. Rörsch, andR. A. Schilperoort, 1974: Prospects in genetic engineering of plants. Quart. Rev. Biophys.7, 35–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holl, F. B., O. L. Gamborg, K. Ohyama, andL. Pelcher, 1974: Genetic transformation in plants. In: Tissue culture and plant science. (H. E. Street, ed.), pp. 301–327. New-York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homes, J., 1974: Scanning electron microscopy of carrot cells and embryoids growingin vitro under various culture conditions. In: Scanning electron microscopy (O. Johari andI. Corvin, eds.), pp. 335–342. Chicago: IITRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffaker, R. C., R. L. Obendorf, G. J. Keller, andG. E. Kleinkopf, 1966: Effects of light intensity in photosynthetic carboxylative phase enzymes and chlorophyll synthesis in greening leaves ofHordeum vulgare L. Plant Physiol.41, 913–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. B., andD. Grierson, 1974: The uptake and expression of DNA by plants. Current Adv. Plant Sci.9, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanai, R., andG. E. Edwards, 1973: Purification of enzymatically isolated mesophyll protoplasts from C3, C4, and crassulacean acid metabolism plants using an aqueous dextran-polyethylene glycol two-phase system. Plant Physiol.52, 484–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessel, R. G., andC. Y. Shih, 1974: Cells in culture. In: Scanning electron microscopy in biology, pp. 63–85. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchers, G., andG. Labib, 1973: Plants from protoplasts. Significance for genetics and breeding. Colloq. Int. C.N.R.S.212, 367–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merril, C. R., andH. Stanbro, 1974: Intracellular gene transfer. Z. Pflanzenphysiol.72, 371–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagata, T., andI. Takebe, 1971: Plating of isolated tobacco mesophyll protoplasts in agar medium. Planta99, 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, L. G., andJ. G. Torrey, 1969: Crop improvement through plant cell and tissue culture. Science166, 1068–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, J. F., andR. E. Totten, 1975: Isolation and regeneration of tobacco mesophyll cell protoplasts under low osmotic conditions. Plant Physiol.55, 689–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. H., 1974: Model systems for somatic cell plant genetics. BioScience24, 269–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, E., B. Wetzel, G. B. Cannon, andD. Berard, 1975: The impact of culture conditions on the surface morphology of cellsin vitro. In: Scanning electron microscopy (O. Johari andI. Corvin, eds.), pp. 351–360. Chicago: IITRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widdus, R., andC. Ault, 1974: Progress in research related to genetic engineering and life synthesis. Int. Rev. Cytology38, 7–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widholm, J. M., 1972: The use of fluorescein diacetate and phenosafranine for determining viability of cultured cells. Stain Technol.47, 189–194.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hughes, B.G., White, F.G. & Smith, M.A. Scanning electron microscopy of barley protoplasts. Protoplasma 90, 399–405 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275690

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275690

Keywords

Navigation